Hi, My app uses the NetworkExtension framework to connect to an access point. For some reason, my app occasionally fails to find and/or connect to my AP (which I know is online and beaconing on a given frequency). This roughly happens 1/10 times. I am using an iPhone 17, running iOS 26.0.1. I am connecting to a WPA2-Personal network. In the iPhone system logs, I see the following: Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: Dequeuing command type: "Scan" pending commands: 0 Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceCopyPreparedScanResults: network records count: 0 Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: WiFi infra associated, NAN DISABLED, , DFS state Off, IR INACTIVE, llwLink ACTIVE, RTM-DP 0, allowing scans Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: isScanDisallowedByAwdl[1148] : InfraScanAllowed 1 (RTModeScan 0 NonSteering 0 assistDisc 0 HTMode 0 RTModeNeeded 0 Immin 0 ScanType 1 Flags 0 ScanOn2GOnly 0 DevAllows2G 1) Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x2(oldState 0) on:1, source:ScanManagerFamily, err:0 Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: setScanningState:: Scan request from ScanManagerFamily. Time since last scan(1.732 s) Number of channels(0), 2.4 only(no), isDFSScan 0, airplaying 0, scanningState 0x2 Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x2(oldState 0) on:1, source:ScanManagerFamily, err:0 Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: Controller Scan Started, scan state 0 -> 2 Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x0(oldState 2) on:0, source:ScanError, err:3766617154 Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: setScanningState[23946]:: Scan complete for source(8)ScanError. Time(0.000 s), airplaying 0, scanningState 0x0 oldState 0x2 rtModeActive 0 (ProxSetup 0 curSchedState 3) Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: IO80211PeerManager::setScanningState:5756:_scanningState:0x0(oldState 2) on:0, source:ScanError, err:3766617154 Oct 10 10:34:10 kernel()[0] <Notice>: wlan0:com.apple.p2p: Controller Scan Done, scan state 2 -> 0 Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(IO80211)[54] <Notice>: Apple80211IOCTLSetWrapper:6536 @[35563.366221] ifname['en0'] IOUC type 10/'APPLE80211_IOC_SCAN_REQ', len[5528] return -528350142/0xe0820442 Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid[54] <Notice>: [WiFiPolicy] {SCAN-} Completed Apple80211ScanAsync on en0 (0xe0820442) with 0 networks Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiDeviceCreateFilteredScanResults: null scanResults Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceCreateFilteredScanResults: rssiThresh 0, doTrimming 0, scanResultsCount: 0, trimmedScanResultsCount: 0, filteredScanResultsCount: 0, nullNetworksCount: 0 Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerDispatchUserForcedAssociationCallback: result 1 Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiDeviceManagerForcedAssociationCallback: failed to association error 1 Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: WiFiLocalizationGetLocalizedString: lang='en_GB' key='WIFI_JOIN_NETWORK_FAILURE_TITLE' value='Unable to join the network \M-b\M^@\M^\%@\M-b\M^@\M^]' Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: WiFiLocalizationGetLocalizedString: lang='en_GB' key='WIFI_FAILURE_OK' value='OK' Oct 10 10:34:10 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerUserForcedAssociationScanCallback: scan results were empty It looks like there is a scan error, and I see the error: failed to association error 1. I have also seen the iOS device find the SSID but fail to associate (associated error 2): Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiMetricsManagerCopyLinkChangeNetworkParams: updating AccessPointInfo: { DeviceNameElement = testssid; ManufacturerElement = " "; ModelName = " "; ModelNumber = " "; } Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiMetricsManagerCopyLinkChangeNetworkParams: minSupportDataRate 6, maxSupportDataRate 54 Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: Disassociated. Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiMetricsManagerUpdateDBAndSubmitAssociationFailure: Failed to append deauthSourceOUI to CA event Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiMetricsManagerUpdateDBAndSubmitAssociationFailure: Failed to append bssidOUI to CA event ..... <log omitted> ..... <log omitted> Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(CoreWiFi)[54] <Notice>: [corewifi] END REQ [GET SSID] took 0.005530542s (pid=260 proc=mediaplaybackd bundleID=com.apple.mediaplaybackd codesignID=com.apple.mediaplaybackd service=com.apple.private.corewifi-xpc qos=21 intf=(null) uuid=D67EF err=-528342013 reply=(null) Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Presenting a CFUserNotification with reply port: 259427 on behalf of: wifid.54 Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Received request to activate alertItem: <SBUserNotificationAlert: 0xc20a49b80; title: Unable to join the network \M-b\M^@\M^\\134^Htestssid\134^?\M-b\M^@\M^]; source: wifid; pid: 54> Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerUserForcedAssociationCallback: failed forced association Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Activation - Presenting <SBUserNotificationAlert: 0xc20a49b80; title: Unable to join the network \M-b\M^@\M^\\134^Htestssid\134^?\M-b\M^@\M^]; source: wifid; pid: 54> with presenter: <SBUnlockedAlertItemPresenter: 0xc1d9f6530> Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Notice>: __WiFiDeviceManagerDispatchUserForcedAssociationCallback: result 2 Oct 8 12:25:52 SpringBoard(SpringBoard)[244] <Notice>: Activation - Presenter:<SBUnlockedAlertItemPresenter: 0xc1d9f6530> will present presentation: <SBAlertItemPresentation: 0xc1cd40820; alertItem: <SBUserNotificationAlert: 0xc20a49b80; presented: NO>; presenter: <SBUnlockedAlertItemPresenter: 0xc1d9f6530>> Oct 8 12:25:52 wifid(WiFiPolicy)[54] <Error>: __WiFiDeviceManagerForcedAssociationCallback: failed to association error 2 Anyone able to help with this?

Our app has a network extension (as I've mentioned lots 😄). We do an upgrade by downloading the new package, stopping & removing all of our components except for the network extension, and then installing the new package, which then loads a LaunchAgent causing the containing app to run. (The only difference between a new install and upgrade is the old extension is left running, but not having anything to tell it what to do, just logs and continues.) On some (but not all) upgrades... nothing ends up able to communicate via XPC with the Network Extension. My simplest cli program to talk to it gets Could not create proxy: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 "The connection to service named blah was invalidated: failed at lookup with error 3 - No such process." UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=The connection to service named bla was invalidated: failed at lookup with error 3 - No such process.} Could not communicate with blah Restarting the extension by doing a kill -9 doesn't fix it; neither does restarting the control daemon. The only solution we've come across so far is rebooting. I filed FB11086599 about this, but has anyone thoughts about this?

Hi all, I have a working macOS (Intel) system extension app that currently uses only a Content Filter (NEFilterDataProvider). I need to capture/log HTTP and HTTPS traffic in plain text, and I understand NETransparentProxyProvider is the right extension type for that. For HTTPS I will need TLS inspection / a MITM proxy — I’m new to that and unsure how complex it will be. For DNS data (in plain text), can I use the same extension, or do I need a separate extension type such as NEPacketTunnelProvider, NEFilterPacketProvider, or NEDNSProxyProvider? Current architecture: Two Xcode targets: MainApp and a SystemExtension target. The SystemExtension target contains multiple network extension types. MainApp ↔ SystemExtension communicate via a bidirectional NSXPC connection. I can already enable two extensions (Content Filter and TransparentProxy). With the NETransparentProxy, I still need to implement HTTPS capture. Questions I’d appreciate help with: Can NETransparentProxy capture the DNS fields I need (dns_hostname, dns_query_type, dns_response_code, dns_answer_number, etc.), or do I need an additional extension type to capture DNS in plain text? If a separate extension is required, is it possible or problematic to include that extension type (Packet Tunnel / DNS Proxy / etc.) in the same SystemExtension Xcode target as the TransparentProxy? Any recommended resources or guidance on TLS inspection / MITM proxy setup for capturing HTTPS logs? There are multiple DNS transport types — am I correct that capturing DNS over UDP (port 53) is not necessarily sufficient? Which DNS types should I plan to handle? I’ve read that TransparentProxy and other extension types (e.g., Packet Tunnel) cannot coexist in the same Xcode target. Is that true? Best approach for delivering logs from multiple extensions to the main app (is it feasible)? Or what’s the best way to capture logs so an external/independent process (or C/C++ daemon) can consume them? Required data to capture (not limited to): All HTTP/HTTPS (request, body, URL, response, etc.) DNS fields: dns_hostname, dns_query_type, dns_response_code, dns_answer_number, and other DNS data — all in plain text. I’ve read various resources but remain unclear which extension(s) to use and whether multiple extension types can be combined in one Xcode target. Please ask if you need more details. Thank you.

Hi, I’m implementing a macOS DNS Proxy as a system extension and running into a persistent activation error: OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain error 9 (validationFailed) with the message: extension category returned error This happens both on an MDM‑managed Mac and on a completely clean Mac (no MDM, fresh install). Setup macOS: 15.x (clean machine, no MDM) Xcode: 16.x Team ID: AAAAAAA111 (test) Host app bundle ID: com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy DNS Proxy system extension bundle ID: com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy The DNS Proxy is implemented as a NetworkExtension system extension, not an app extension. Host app entitlements From codesign -d --entitlements :- /Applications/NetShieldProxy.app: xml com.apple.application-identifier AAAAAAA111.com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy <key>com.apple.developer.system-extension.install</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key> <string>AAAAAAA111</string> <key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key> <true/> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>group.com.example.NetShieldmac</string> </array> <key>com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-only</key> <true/> xml com.apple.application-identifier AAAAAAA111.com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy <key>com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension</key> <array> <string>dns-proxy-systemextension</string> </array> <key>com.apple.developer.team-identifier</key> <string>AAAAAAA111</string> <key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key> <array> <string>group.com.example.NetShieldmac</string> <string>group.example.NetShieldmac</string> <string>group.example.agent.enterprise.macos</string> <string>group.example.com.NetShieldmac</string> </array> DNS Proxy system extension Info.plist On the clean Mac, from: bash plutil -p "/Applications/NetShieldProxy.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy.systemextension/Contents/Info.plist" I get: json { "CFBundleExecutable" => "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy", "CFBundleIdentifier" => "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy", "CFBundleName" => "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy", "CFBundlePackageType" => "SYSX", "CFBundleShortVersionString" => "1.0.1.8", "CFBundleSupportedPlatforms" => [ "MacOSX" ], "CFBundleVersion" => "0.1.1", "LSMinimumSystemVersion" => "13.5", "NSExtension" => { "NSExtensionPointIdentifier" => "com.apple.dns-proxy", "NSExtensionPrincipalClass" => "com_example_agent_NetShieldProxy_dnsProxy.DNSProxyProvider" }, "NSSystemExtensionUsageDescription" => "SYSTEM_EXTENSION_USAGE_DESCRIPTION" } The DNSProxyProvider class inherits from NEDNSProxyProvider and is built in the system extension target. Activation code In the host app, I use: swift import SystemExtensions final class SystemExtensionActivator: NSObject, OSSystemExtensionRequestDelegate { private let extensionIdentifier = "com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy" func activate(completion: @escaping (Bool) -> Void) { let request = OSSystemExtensionRequest.activationRequest( forExtensionWithIdentifier: extensionIdentifier, queue: .main ) request.delegate = self OSSystemExtensionManager.shared.submitRequest(request) } func request(_ request: OSSystemExtensionRequest, didFailWithError error: Error) { let nsError = error as NSError print("Activation failed:", nsError) } func request(_ request: OSSystemExtensionRequest, didFinishWithResult result: OSSystemExtensionRequest.Result) { print("Result:", result.rawValue) } } Runtime behavior on a clean Mac (no MDM) config.plist is created under /Library/Application Support/NetShield (via a root shell script). A daemon runs, contacts our backend, and writes /Library/Application Support/NetShield/state.plist with a valid dnsToken and other fields. The app NetShieldProxy.app is installed via a notarized, stapled Developer ID .pkg. The extension bundle is present at: /Applications/NetShieldProxy.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy.systemextension. When I press Activate DNS Proxy in the UI, I see in the unified log: text NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] Requesting activation for system extension: com.example.agent.NetShieldProxy.dnsProxy NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] SystemExtensionActivator - activation failed: extension category returned error (domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=9) NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] SystemExtensionActivator - OSSystemExtensionError code enum: 9 NetShieldProxy: [com.example.agent:SystemExtensionActivator] SystemExtensionActivator - validationFailed And: bash systemextensionsctl list -> 0 extension(s) There is no prompt in Privacy & Security on this clean Mac. Question Given: The extension is packaged as a system extension (CFBundlePackageType = SYSX) with NSExtensionPointIdentifier = "com.apple.dns-proxy". Host and extension share the same Team ID and Developer ID Application cert. Entitlements on the target machine match the provisioning profile and Apple’s docs for DNS Proxy system extensions (dns-proxy-systemextension). This is happening on a clean Mac with no MDM profiles at all. What are the likely reasons for OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain error 9 (validationFailed) with "extension category returned error" in this DNS Proxy system extension scenario? Is there any additional configuration required for DNS Proxy system extensions (beyond entitlements and Info.plist) that could trigger this category-level validation failure? Any guidance or examples of a working DNS Proxy system extension configuration (host entitlements + extension Info.plist + entitlements) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Greetings, I would like to understand this URLCache behavior for two different requests to the same end point but with a different header value. Here is a code with comment explaining the behavior. // Create a request to for a url. let url = URL(string: "https://&lt;my url&gt;?f=json")! var request = URLRequest(url: url) // Set custom header with a value. request.setValue("myvalue", forHTTPHeaderField: "CustomField") // Send request to get the response. let (data, response) = try await URLSession.shared.data(for: request) print("data: \(String(describing: String(data: data, encoding: .utf8)))") print("response: \(response)") // Create second request to the same url but with different value of custom header field. var request2 = URLRequest(url: url) request2.setValue("newvalue", forHTTPHeaderField: "CustomField") // Check the URL cache for second request and it returns the response // of the first request even though the second request has different header value. let cachedResponse = URLCache.shared.cachedResponse(for: request2) print("cachedResponse: \(cachedResponse?.response)") Is this a bug in URLCache that request headers are not matched while returning the response? Is this an expected behavior? If yes, why?

I'm implementing a NEDNSProxyProvider on macOS 15.x and macOS 26.x. The flow works correctly up to the last step — returning the DNS response to the client via writeDatagrams. Environment: macOS 15.x, 26.x Xcode 26.x NEDNSProxyProvider with NEAppProxyUDPFlow What I'm doing: override func handleNewFlow(_ flow: NEAppProxyFlow) -> Bool { guard let udpFlow = flow as? NEAppProxyUDPFlow else { return false } udpFlow.readDatagrams { datagrams, endpoints, error in // 1. Read DNS request from client // 2. Forward to upstream DNS server via TCP // 3. Receive response from upstream // 4. Try to return response to client: udpFlow.writeDatagrams([responseData], sentBy: [endpoints.first!]) { error in // Always fails: "The datagram was too large" // responseData is 50-200 bytes — well within UDP limits } } return true } Investigation: I added logging to check the type of endpoints.first : // On macOS 15.0 and 26.3.1: // type(of: endpoints.first) → NWAddressEndpoint // Not NWHostEndpoint as expected On both macOS 15.4 and 26.3.1, readDatagrams returns [NWEndpoint] where each endpoint appears to be NWAddressEndpoint — a type that is not publicly documented. When I try to create NWHostEndpoint manually from hostname and port, and pass it to writeDatagrams, the error "The datagram was too large" still occurs in some cases. Questions: What is the correct endpoint type to pass to writeDatagrams on macOS 15.x, 26.x? Should we pass the exact same NWEndpoint objects returned by readDatagrams, or create new ones? NWEndpoint, NWHostEndpoint, and writeDatagrams are all deprecated in macOS 15. Is there a replacement API for NEAppProxyUDPFlow that works with nw_endpoint_t from the Network framework? Is the error "The datagram was too large" actually about the endpoint type rather than the data size? Any guidance would be appreciated. :-))

Hi All, I am working on a macOS System Extension using Apple’s Network Extension Framework, designed to observe and log network activity at multiple layers. The system extension is currently stable and working as expected for HTTP and DNS traffic with 3 providers, getting Socket, HTTP, and DNS logs. Current Architecture Overview The project consists of two Xcode targets: 1. Main App Process Responsible for: Managing system extension lifecycle (activation, configuration) Establishing IPC (XPC) communication with extensions Receiving structured logs from extensions Writing logs efficiently to disk using a persistent file handle Uses: OSSystemExtensionManager NEFilterManager, NETransparentProxyManager, NEDNSProxyManager NWPathMonitor for network availability handling Persistent logging mechanism (FileHandle) 2. System Extension Process Contains three providers, all running within a single system extension process: a) Content Filter (NEFilterDataProvider) Captures socket-level metadata Extracts: PID via audit token Local/remote endpoints Protocol (TCP/UDP, IPv4/IPv6) Direction (inbound/outbound) Sends structured JSON logs via shared IPC b) Transparent Proxy (NETransparentProxyProvider) Intercepts TCP flows Creates a corresponding NWConnection to the destination Captures both HTTP and HTTPS traffic, sends it to HTTPFlowLogger file which bypasses if it's not HTTP traffic. Uses a custom HTTPFlowLogger: Built using SwiftNIO library (NIO HTTP1) Parses up to HTTP/1.1 traffic Handles streaming, headers, and partial body capture (with size limits) Maintains per-flow state and lifecycle management Logs structured HTTP data via shared IPC c) DNS Proxy (NEDNSProxyProvider) Intercepts UDP DNS traffic Forwards queries to upstream resolver (system DNS or fallback) Maintains shared UDP connection Tracks pending requests using DNS IDs Parses DNS packets (queries + responses) using a custom parser Logs structured DNS metadata via shared IPC Shared Component: IPCConnection Single bidirectional XPC channel used by all providers Handles: App → Extension registration Extension → App logging Uses Mach service defined in system extension entitlements Project Structure NetworkExtension (Project) │ ├── NetworkExtension (Target 1: Main App) │ ├── AppDelegate.swift │ ├── Assets.xcassets │ ├── Info.plist │ ├── NetworkExtension.entitlements │ ├── Main.storyboard │ └──ViewController.swift │ ├── SystemExtensions (Target 2: Extension Process) │ ├── common/ │ │ ├── IPCConnection.swift │ │ └── main.swift │ │ │ ├── DNSProxyProvider/ │ │ ├──DNSDataParser.swift │ │ └──DNSProxyProvider.swift (DNS Proxy) │ │ │ ├── FilterDataProvider/ │ │ └── FilterDataProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── TransparentProxyProvider/ │ │ ├── HTTPLogParser.swift │ │ ├── LogDataModel.swift │ │ └──TransparentProxyProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── Info.plist │ └── SystemExtensions.entitlements │ Current Capabilities Unified logging pipeline across: Socket-level metadata HTTP traffic (HTTP/1.1) DNS queries/responses Efficient log handling using persistent file descriptors Stable IPC communication between app and extensions Flow-level tracking and lifecycle management Selective filtering (e.g., bypass rules for specific IPs) What's the best approach to add TLS Inspection with MITM proxy setup? Some context and constraints: Existing implementation handles HTTP parsing and should remain unchanged (Swift-based). I’m okay with bypassing apps/sites that use certificate pinning (e.g., banking apps) and legitimate sites. Performance is important — I want to avoid high CPU utilization. I’m relatively new to TLS inspection and MITM proxy design. Questions Is it a good idea to implement TLS inspection within a system extension, or does that typically introduce significant complexity and performance overhead? As NETransparentProxyProvider already intercepting HTTPS traffic, can we redirect it to a separate processing pipeline (e.g., another file/module), while keeping the existing HTTP parser(HTTPFlowLogger - HTTP only parser) intact? What are the recommended architectural approaches for adding HTTPS parsing via MITM in a performant way? Are there best practices for selectively bypassing pinned or sensitive domains while still inspecting other traffic? Any guidance on avoiding common pitfalls (e.g., certificate handling, connection reuse, latency issues)? I’m looking for a clean, maintainable approach to integrate HTTPS inspection into my existing system without unnecessary complexity or performance degradation. Please let me know if any additional details from my side would help in suggesting the most appropriate approach. Thanks in advance for your time and insights—I really appreciate it.

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/corewlan/cweventtype/linkqualitydidchange As per the documentation core WLAN will send notification when there is a change in RSSI. I did not receive any notification when there is a change in RSSI.

I am facing an intermittent problem where iPhones are failing to pair/connect with Xcode under Xcode -> Windows -> Devices and Simulators. This happens when more than one web content filters are present, for instance, I have my web content filter (FilterSockets true, FilterGrade Firewall) and there is also Sentinel One web content filter with same configuration. Note: We are not blocking any flow from remoted / remotepairingd / core device service / MDRemoteServiceSupport etc processes. But they do get paused and resumed at times for our internal traffic verification logic. So, we are trying to understand what impact our content filter may be having on this iPhone Pairing?? If we stop either one of the filters the problem goes away. I have tracked the network traffic to the phone, and it seems to be using a ethernet interface (en5/en10) over the USB-C cable. I can see endpoints like this: localEndpoint = fe80::7:afff:fea1:edb8%en5.54442 remoteEndpoint = fe80::7:afff:fea1:ed47%en5.49813 I also see remoted process has the below ports open : sudo lsof -nP -iTCP -iUDP | grep remoted remoted 376 root 4u IPv6 0xce4a89bddba37bce 0t0 TCP [fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:edb8]:57395->[fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:ed47]:58783 (ESTABLISHED) remoted 376 root 6u IPv6 0xf20811f6922613c7 0t0 TCP [fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:edb8]:57396 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 7u IPv6 0x2c393a52251fcc56 0t0 TCP [fe80:15::7:afff:fea1:edb8]:57397 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 8u IPv6 0xcb9c311b0ec1d6a0 0t0 TCP [fd6e:8a96:a57d::2]:57398 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 9u IPv6 0xc582859e0623fe4e 0t0 TCP [fd6e:8a96:a57d::2]:57399 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 10u IPv6 0x2f7d9cee24a44c5b 0t0 TCP [fd6e:8a96:a57d::2]:57400->[fd6e:8a96:a57d::1]:60448 (ESTABLISHED) remoted 376 root 11u IPv6 0xbdb7003643659de 0t0 TCP [fd07:2e7e:2a83::2]:57419 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 12u IPv6 0x569a5b649ff8f957 0t0 TCP [fd07:2e7e:2a83::2]:57420 (LISTEN) remoted 376 root 13u IPv6 0xa034657978a7da29 0t0 TCP [fd07:2e7e:2a83::2]:57421->[fd07:2e7e:2a83::1]:61729 (ESTABLISHED) But due to the dynamic nature of port and IPs used we are not able to decide on an effective early bypass NEFilterRule. We don't want to use a very broad bypass criteria like all link local IPs etc. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Eager to see the Wi-Fi Aware communication between iPhone (iOS 26) and an Android device, I tried iOS 26 beta on my iPhone16. and tried below code snippet from provided example at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/building-peer-to-peer-apps. Idea is to first verify discovery of Android WiFiAware service on iOS. extension WAPublishableService { public static var simulationService: WAPublishableService { allServices[simulationServiceName]! } } extension WASubscribableService { public static var simulationService: WASubscribableService { allServices[simulationServiceName]! } } struct ContentView: View { @State private var showingDevicePicker = false @State private var pairedDevices: [WAPairedDevice] = [] // To hold discovered/paired devices var body: some View { VStack { Button("Discover Devices") { showingDevicePicker = true // Trigger the device picker presentation } .sheet(isPresented: $showingDevicePicker) { DevicePicker(.wifiAware(.connecting(to: .selected([]), from: .simulationService))) { endpoint in print("Paired Endpoint: \(endpoint)") } label: { Image(systemName: "plus") Text("Add Device") } fallback: { Image(systemName: "xmark.circle") Text("Unavailable") } } List(pairedDevices) { device in Text(device.name ?? "Unknown Device") } } } } With suggested entitlement of WiFiAware and info.plist of service info. Then I had Android device with WIFiAware service publishing service (service name set '_sat-simulation._udp') from this app https://github.com/anagramrice/NAN. But above iOS app is unable to find the service published from android device. Am I missing something? Note: the above Android-NAN app seems to be working fine between Android to Another Android.

My company has a server that supports ticket-based TLS session resumption (per RFC 5077). We have done Wireshark captures that show that our iOS client app, which uses URLSession for REST and WebSocket connections to the server, is not sending the TLS "session_ticket" extension in the Client Hello package that necessary to enable ticket-based resumption with the server. Is it expected that URLSession does not support ticket-based TLS session resumption? If "yes", is there any way to tell URLSession to enable ticket-based session resumption? the lower-level API set_protocol_options_set_tls_tickets_enabled() hints that the overall TLS / HTTP stack on IOS does support ticket-based resumption, but I can't see how to use that low-level API with URLSession. I can provide (lots) more technical details if necessary, but hopefully this is enough context to determine whether ticket-based TLS resumption is supported with URLSession. Any tips / clarifications would be greatly appreciated.

I have a custom VPN app that uses NETunnelProviderManager to install a VPN Profile if one is not already installed. On previous iOS versions this would open the VPN Settings and ask for either the PIN, FaceID or TouchID and install the profile. With iOS 26 beta5 it opens the VPN Settings and stops. Is this a bug in iOS 26? Have there been changes to NETunnelProviderManager for iOS 26 that I'm not aware of? FYI we do the samething on macOS 26 beta5 and that works as expected.

Howdy, I've been developing a packet tunnel extension meant to run on iOS and MacOS. For development I'm using xcodegen + xcodebuild to assemble a bunch of swift and rust code together. I'm moving from direct TUN device management on Mac to shipping a Network Extension (appex). With that move I noticed that on some mac laptops NE fails to start completely, whilst on others everything works fine. I'm using CODE_SIGN_STYLE: Automatic, Apple IDs are within the same team, all devices are registered as dev devices. Signing dev certificates, managed by xcode. Some suspicious logs: (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Signature check failed: code failed to satisfy specified code requirement(s) ... (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Provider is not signed with a Developer ID certificate What could be the issue? Where those inconsistencies across devices might come from?

Hello, I am investigating a recurring crash that appears to be originating within the system's network stack. OS Version: iPhone OS 26.1 (23B85) Role: Foreground Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Subtype: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000000 Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000000 Triggered by Thread: 19 Description: The crash is triggered by Thread 19 and occurs deep within libquic.dylib during a QUIC recovery timer event. Based on the backtrace, the failure happens in quic_recovery_pto. The issue seems to occur when a protocol instance schedules a wakeup, leading to a null pointer dereference in the system library. Crashed Thread Backtrace snippet:Thread 19 Crashed: Thread 19 Crashed: 0 libquic.dylib 0x00000001a00a38cc quic_recovery_pto + 72 (quic_recovery.c:1259) 1 libquic.dylib 0x00000001a00a3390 quic_recovery_timer_fired + 132 (quic_recovery.c:1460) 2 libquic.dylib 0x00000001a00a1f8c quic_timer_run + 248 (quic_timer.c:210) 3 Network 0x000000018ec76cbc __nw_protocol_instance_schedule_wakeup_block_invoke + 76 (protocol_implementation.cpp:5847) 4 Network 0x000000018eba34e0 __nw_context_reset_timer_block_with_time_block_invoke + 268 (context.cpp:2224) 5 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c84727ec _dispatch_client_callout + 16 (client_callout.mm:85) 6 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c845d664 _dispatch_continuation_pop + 596 (queue.c:349) 7 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c8470528 _dispatch_source_latch_and_call + 396 (source.c:601) 8 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c846f1fc _dispatch_source_invoke + 844 (source.c:966) 9 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c8463288 _dispatch_workloop_invoke + 1612 (queue.c:4761) 10 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c846c3ec _dispatch_root_queue_drain_deferred_wlh + 292 (queue.c:7265) 11 libdispatch.dylib 0x00000001c846bce4 _dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 692 (queue.c:6859) 12 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00000001ec0623b8 _pthread_wqthread + 292 (pthread.c:2696) 13 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x00000001ec0618c0 start_wqthread + 8 (:-1) Can anyone provide insights into what might be causing libquic to access an invalid address in this context? Any help or suggestions for further diagnostics would be greatly appreciated.

We have a VPN app that uses NEPacketTunnelProvider with includeAllNetworks = true. We've encountered an issue where push notifications are not delivered over Wi-Fi while the tunnel is active in a pre-MFA quarantine state (tunnel is up but traffic is blocked on server side), regardless of whether excludeAPNS is set to true or false. Observed behavior Wi-Fi excludeAPNS = true - Notifications not delivered Wi-Fi excludeAPNS = false - Notifications not delivered Cellular excludeAPNS = true - Notifications delivered Cellular excludeAPNS = false - Notifications not delivered On cellular, the behavior matches our expectations: setting excludeAPNS = true allows APNS traffic to bypass the tunnel and notifications arrive; setting it to false routes APNS through the tunnel and notifications are blocked (as expected for a non-forwarding tunnel). On Wi-Fi, notifications fail to deliver in both cases. Our question Is this expected behavior when includeAllNetworks is enabled on Wi-Fi, or is this a known issue / bug with APNS delivery? Is there something else in the Wi-Fi networking path that includeAllNetworks affects beyond routing, which could prevent APNS from functioning even when the traffic is excluded from the tunnel? Sample Project Below is the minimal code that reproduces this issue. The project has two targets: a main app and a Network Extension. The tunnel provider captures all IPv4 and IPv6 traffic via default routes but does not forward packets — simulating a pre-MFA quarantine state. The main app configures the tunnel with includeAllNetworks = true and provides a UI toggle for excludeAPNS. PacketTunnelProvider.swift (Network Extension target): import NetworkExtension class PacketTunnelProvider: NEPacketTunnelProvider { override func startTunnel(options: [String : NSObject]?, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) { let settings = NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings(tunnelRemoteAddress: "127.0.0.1") let ipv4 = NEIPv4Settings(addresses: ["198.51.100.1"], subnetMasks: ["255.255.255.0"]) ipv4.includedRoutes = [NEIPv4Route.default()] settings.ipv4Settings = ipv4 let ipv6 = NEIPv6Settings(addresses: ["fd00::1"], networkPrefixLengths: [64]) ipv6.includedRoutes = [NEIPv6Route.default()] settings.ipv6Settings = ipv6 let dns = NEDNSSettings(servers: ["198.51.100.1"]) settings.dnsSettings = dns settings.mtu = 1400 setTunnelNetworkSettings(settings) { error in if let error = error { completionHandler(error) return } self.readPackets() completionHandler(nil) } } private func readPackets() { packetFlow.readPackets { [weak self] packets, protocols in self?.readPackets() } } override func stopTunnel(with reason: NEProviderStopReason, completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) { completionHandler() } override func handleAppMessage(_ messageData: Data, completionHandler: ((Data?) -> Void)?) { if let handler = completionHandler { handler(messageData) } } override func sleep(completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) { completionHandler() } override func wake() { } } ContentView.swift (Main app target) — trimmed to essentials: import SwiftUI import NetworkExtension struct ContentView: View { @State private var excludeAPNs = false @State private var manager: NETunnelProviderManager? var body: some View { VStack { Toggle("Exclude APNs", isOn: $excludeAPNs) .onChange(of: excludeAPNs) { Task { await saveAndReload() } } Button("Connect") { Task { await toggleVPN() } } } .padding() .task { await loadManager() } } private func loadManager() async { let managers = try? await NETunnelProviderManager.loadAllFromPreferences() if let existing = managers?.first { manager = existing } else { let m = NETunnelProviderManager() let proto = NETunnelProviderProtocol() proto.providerBundleIdentifier = "<your-extension-bundle-id>" proto.serverAddress = "127.0.0.1" proto.includeAllNetworks = true proto.excludeAPNs = excludeAPNs m.protocolConfiguration = proto m.localizedDescription = "TestVPN" m.isEnabled = true try? await m.saveToPreferences() try? await m.loadFromPreferences() manager = m } if let proto = manager?.protocolConfiguration as? NETunnelProviderProtocol { excludeAPNs = proto.excludeAPNs } } private func saveAndReload() async { guard let manager else { return } if let proto = manager.protocolConfiguration as? NETunnelProviderProtocol { proto.includeAllNetworks = true proto.excludeAPNs = excludeAPNs } manager.isEnabled = true try? await manager.saveToPreferences() try? await manager.loadFromPreferences() } private func toggleVPN() async { guard let manager else { return } if manager.connection.status == .connected { manager.connection.stopVPNTunnel() } else { await saveAndReload() try? manager.connection.startVPNTunnel() } } } Steps to reproduce Build and run the sample project with above code on a physical iOS device. Connect to a Wi-Fi network. Set excludeAPNS = true using the toggle and tap Connect. Send a push notification to the device to a test app with remote notification capability (e.g., via a test push service or the push notification console). Observe that the notification is not delivered. Disconnect. Switch to cellular. Reconnect with the same settings. Send the same push notification — observe that it is delivered. Environment iOS 26.2 Xcode 26.2 Physical device (iPhone 15 Pro)

We've received several reports of a new bug while setting up our products with WAC. The Accessory Setup UI appears with a blank network selected and the message 'This accessory will be set up to join "(null)".' at top. The user can tap "Show Other Networks..." to select another network, but this experience is very confusing. Why does this UI present a choice that is known to be invalid when other valid choices exist? I've captured a screenshot and sysdiagnose from this case. In most cases this problem happens only intermittently, but I can reproduce it consistently by disconnecting my iPhone from any WiFi network (WiFi remains enabled). My suggestion for a better user experience is that this UI should select the default network according to these rules: The network to which iPhone is currently connected. Any network which is in the known/my list for this iPhone Any valid network I believe rule #1 is the existing behavior, but applying rules #2 and #3 as fallbacks would be an improvement. Is there anything I can change in my iOS code or in my accessory's WAC server to improve this experience?

Recently, my application was having trouble sending udp messages after it was reinstalled. The cause of the problem was initially that I did not grant local network permissions when I reinstalled, I was aware of the problem, so udp worked fine after I granted permissions. However, the next time I repeat the previous operation, I also do not grant local network permissions, and then turn it back on in the Settings, and udp does not work properly (no messages can be sent, the system version and code have not changed). Fortunately, udp worked after rebooting the phone, and more importantly, I was able to repeat the problem many times. So I want to know if the process between when I re-uninstall the app and deny local network permissions, and when I turn it back on in Settings, is that permissions have been granted normally, and not fake, and not required a reboot to reset something for udp to take effect. I'm not sure if it's the system, or if it's a similar situation as described here, hopefully that will help me find out

Hello and Good day! We are conducting Bonjour Conformance Test (BCT) for Printer device. BCT result is PASSED but with warning in Multicast DNS, specifically, WARNING: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Other Shared Reply Timing is passed: PASSED: MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Environment: BCT Tool Version: 1.5.4 (15400) MacOS Sequioa 15.5 DUT Firmware : Linux Debian 9 Apple mDNSResponder 1790.80.10 Service types: _ipps._tcp, _uscans._tcp, _ipp._tcp, _uscan._tcp Router : NEC AtermWR8370N Setup: 1-to-1 [Mac->Router<-DUT connection] Based on debug.log, this is where WARNING occurs: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870187+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 26ms, max = 114ms, avg = 65.50ms WARNING 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870361+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04136: 50 percent of the replies within the correct range fell in the interval 20ms and 46ms (should be close to 25%). PASSED (SHARED REPLY TIMING) In the same debug.log for MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING is PASSED: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912334+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 22ms, max = 112ms, avg = 78.00ms DEBUG_2 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912849+0900 recv_packet 01997: received packet (558 bytes) PASSED (MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING) [Details] Looking at Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf https://download.developer.apple.com/Documentation/Bonjour_Conformance_Test_Guideline/Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf there were some differences: In 1.6.2 Expected Result: Test Result File of Test that All Tests Passed, this is not displayed: PASSED: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION And in II.8 Shared Reply Timing: (Ideally, 25% of the answers should fall in each 21ms quadrant of the range 20ms - 125ms.) and comparing to the debug.log, there was a discrepancy of the interval, because 20ms and 46ms is 26ms interval. From RFC6762 6. Responding, Ideal range is from 20ms-120ms Because of this, please advise on the questions below: I would like to know on the possible cause and resolution for these WARNINGS. And since in current BCT result, (Test result integrity signature is generated), I would like to know if this is acceptable for BCT certification. Thank you.

Hello eveybody,Currently I'm working on an app which connects to a device. During testing I encounter an internal error of NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain. See the log snippet:Domain=NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain Code=8 "internal error." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=internal error.}This error appears randomly. In one day I encountered it three times. The only solution I can think of is catching this error somehow and then telling the user to restart the device.After this error appears, the wifi functionality of iOS in all third party apps seems to be broken. Only restarting helps as far as I know. Also there seems to be nothing we as app developers can do about it. Therefor I wonder if there is some way to prevent this error somehow? The only solution I can think of is catching this error somehow and then telling the user to restart the device.Also since there is not much information about this error on the web, it would be really nice if someone can clarify whats going on with this error.Regards.

Greetings.I have an app today that uses multipeer connectivity extensively. Currently, when the user switches away from the app, MPC disconnects the session(s) - this is by design apparently (per other feedback). I'd like to hear if anyone has experimented with iOS9 multitasking / multipeer and whether MPC sessions can stay alive?Thanks