I am seeing an issue with NETransparentProxyProvider where the extension successfully transitions from sleep to wake, but stops receiving handleNewFlow(_:) calls. Only below two methods gets called, We don't apply rules in these methods: override func wake() override func sleep(completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) This breaking complete proxy workflow as it stops intercepting traffics. We are not observing this issues always. FYI: com.apple.developer.endpoint-security.client is not present in .entitlement file. I am not sure adding this will help. Any possibilities nesessionmanager might fail to re-bind the traffic rules for this extensions? Any thing we can do to avoid this issues?

com.apple.main-thread 0 StarMaker 0x5c40854 _isPlatformVersionAtLeast.cold.2 + 4425680980 1 StarMaker 0x526d278 -[FPRScreenTraceTracker displayLinkStep] + 191 (FPRScreenTraceTracker.m:191) 2 QuartzCore 0xbe924 CA::Display::DisplayLinkItem::dispatch(CA::SignPost::Interval<(CA::SignPost::CAEventCode)835322056>&) + 64 3 QuartzCore 0x9bf38 CA::Display::DisplayLink::dispatch_items(unsigned long long, unsigned long long, unsigned long long) + 880 4 QuartzCore 0xaf770 CA::Display::DisplayLink::dispatch_deferred_display_links(unsigned int) + 360 5 UIKitCore 0x7dee4 _UIUpdateSequenceRunNext + 128 6 UIKitCore 0x7d374 schedulerStepScheduledMainSectionContinue + 60 7 UpdateCycle 0x1560 UC::DriverCore::continueProcessing() + 84 8 CoreFoundation 0x164cc __CFMachPortPerform + 168 9 CoreFoundation 0x460b0 CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_SOURCE1_PERFORM_FUNCTION + 60 10 CoreFoundation 0x45fd8 __CFRunLoopDoSource1 + 508 11 CoreFoundation 0x1dc1c __CFRunLoopRun + 2168 12 CoreFoundation 0x1ca6c _CFRunLoopRunSpecificWithOptions + 532 13 GraphicsServices 0x1498 GSEventRunModal + 120 14 UIKitCore 0x9ddf8 -[UIApplication _run] + 792 15 UIKitCore 0x46e54 UIApplicationMain + 336 16 StarMaker 0x50c965c main + 18 (main.m:18) 17 ??? 0x19a9dae28 (缺少) Thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x67f4 __semwait_signal + 8 1 libsystem_c.dylib 0xc7e4 nanosleep + 220 2 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x1eb0f8 std::__Cr::this_thread::sleep_for(std::__Cr::chrono::duration<long long, std::__Cr::ratio<1l, 1000000000l>> const&) + 198 (pthread.h:198) 3 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x27d30 zorro::KbLog::Loop() + 88 (kblog.cc:88) 4 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x286e8 <deduplicated_symbol> + 4667967208 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x444c _pthread_start + 136 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x8cc thread_start + 8 Thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x67f4 __semwait_signal + 8 1 libsystem_c.dylib 0xc7e4 nanosleep + 220 2 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x1eb0f8 std::__Cr::this_thread::sleep_for(std::__Cr::chrono::duration<long long, std::__Cr::ratio<1l, 1000000000l>> const&) + 198 (pthread.h:198) 3 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x19a4e4 zorro::ZkbLog::Loop() + 157 (zlog.cc:157) 4 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x286e8 <deduplicated_symbol> + 4667967208 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x444c _pthread_start + 136 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x8cc thread_start + 8 Thread 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x67f4 __semwait_signal + 8 1 libsystem_c.dylib 0xc7e4 nanosleep + 220 2 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x1eb0f8 std::__Cr::this_thread::sleep_for(std::__Cr::chrono::duration<long long, std::__Cr::ratio<1l, 1000000000l>> const&) + 198 (pthread.h:198) 3 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x19c4d8 zorro::QosManager::Loop() + 966 (string:966) 4 ZorroRtcEngineKit 0x286e8 <deduplicated_symbol> + 4667967208 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x444c _pthread_start + 136 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x8cc thread_start + 8

After implementing the new structured concurrency API's for Network framework, we are noticing a few memory leaks in the Network framework when using API's like onViabilityUpdate and onBetterPathUpdate. Whenever a previously established connection is disconnected, the NWConnection object is never released by the Network framework when we use the 2 API's mentioned. Irrespective of what goes inside these handlers(or leave it empty), the connection object is leaking. If I comment out the handlers, there is no memory leak. Posting this here in the forum to understand if others have encountered similar issues and found a workaround? Raised a feedback assistant request with all the details and a sample app here: FB22339653

Hi Apple Team / Community, We are currently pulling our hair out over a TestNet OTA issue and could really use some help. Our Matter Door Lock (VID: 5424, PID: 513) has already obtained official CSA Certification, so we are 100% confident that our device firmware and OTA Requestor logic are completely solid. However, we simply cannot get Apple's TestNet to serve the update via HomePod. Here is exactly what is happening: Our device successfully sends a QueryImage command to the HomePod. The HomePod receives it, but immediately fires back a QueryImageResponse that essentially means "UpdateNotAvailable", forcing the device into an 86400-second sleep timeout. Here is what we have verified so far: Local OTA works perfectly: If we use Nordic's chip-ota-provider-app locally with the exact same .ota file, the BDX transfer triggers instantly and the device updates without a hitch. DCL details are 100% accurate: We published a brand new version (1.0.4 / 16778240) which is strictly higher than the device's current version (1.0.1 / 16777472). The otaFileSize (973839) and Base64 Checksum match the file perfectly. ZERO hits on our server: The OTA file is hosted on an AWS S3 direct link (SSL Grade A via SSL Labs, ATS compliant). We checked our server logs, and there hasn't been a single download attempt from any Apple IP addresses. Since our device is certified and local OTA works flawlessly, it strongly feels like Apple's TestNet backend either has a stuck/cached "invalid" state for our VID/PID (very similar to what was reported in CHIP GitHub Issue #29338), or the Apple backend crawler is failing to reach our URL for some internal reason. Could someone please check if there is a cached exception for VID: 5424 / PID: 513 on the TestNet backend? Any help or pointers would be hugely appreciated! Thanks in advance.

I'm developing a macOS security tool using NEFilterDataProvider as a system extension. On macOS 26 beta (25E241), sysextd consistently rejects my extension with: sysextd: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications Configuration: App installed in /Applications/ Signed with Developer ID Application (693DSH8GN5) Entitlement: com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension = content-filter-provider com.apple.developer.system-extension.install = true Developer Mode enabled on test machine Comparison with Little Snitch: Little Snitch runs correctly on the same machine. Key differences I found: Little Snitch uses content-filter-provider-systemextension instead of content-filter-provider Little Snitch has com.apple.security.app-sandbox = false Both signed with Developer ID Application When I switch to content-filter-provider-systemextension, Xcode rejects every provisioning profile because none match that entitlement value, and the Developer Portal doesn't expose fine-grained control over the Network Extensions array values. Questions Is content-filter-provider-systemextension the correct entitlement for system extensions on macOS 26? How should the provisioning profile be configured to support it? Is there a known sysextd issue on macOS 26 beta causing this regardless of configuration? Is there - somewhere! - a guide on how to build such an extension? Thanks in advance for your help.

Based on https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/nednssettings/searchdomains , we expect the values mentioned in searchDomains to be appended to a single label DNS query. However, we are not seeing this behavior. We have a packetTunnelProvider VPN, where we set searchDomains to a dns suffix (for ex: test.com) and we set matchDomains to applications and suffix (for ex: abc.com and test.com) . When a user tries to access https://myapp , we expect to see a DNS query packet for myapp.test.com . However, this is not happening when matchDomainsNoSearch is set to true. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/nednssettings/matchdomainsnosearch When matchDomainsNoSearch is set to false, we see dns queries for myapp.test.com and myapp.abc.com. What is the expected behavior of searchDomains?

I added a Content Filter to my app, and when running it in Xcode (Debug/Release), I get the expected permission prompt: "Would like to filter network content (Allow / Don't Allow)". However, when I install the app via TestFlight, this prompt doesn’t appear at all, and the feature doesn’t work. Is there a special configuration required for TestFlight? Has anyone encountered this issue before? Thanks!

Hello, I have implemented a URL Filter using the sample provided here: Filtering Traffic by URL. I am also using an App Group to dynamically manage the Bloom filter and block list data. However, when I update my block list URLs and create a new Bloom filter plist in the App Group, the extension does not seem to use the updated Bloom filter even after the prefetch interval expires. Also for testing purpose can I keep this interval to 10 mins or below ?

This is a bit complicated to explain so bare with me. I am working on building an app that allows you to send real time video/camera captures from one Apple device to another. I am using a custom UDP protocol built on top of NWListener, NWBrowser, and NWConnection APIs. It works fine, but there are a few issues that seems to all be related to awdl: When transmitting via WiFi over the router (not using peer-to-peer), there are periodic interruptions when the wireless card on the device changes channels for awdl polling. This is resolved by changing the 5GHz WiFi channel on the router to channel 149 (or disabling AWDL altogether which is not really feasible). In order to work around number 1, I decided to build in an option to toggle/prefer peer-to-peer transmission in the app thinking that if everything goes over a peer-to-peer connection the jitter caused from the channel switching should go away. This also works, but with an important caveat. The default transmission is extremely choppy until you take an OS action that “elevates” the AWDL connection into “realtime” mode. I am using includePeerToPeer on the listener, browser, and connection as well as serviceClass interactiveVideo. For number 1, you can understand that asking users to change the channel on their router is not a great user experience, but the problem is the peer-to-peer connection workaround is also not great by default. For number 2, as an example of the behavior, I can send a stream from my Mac to my iPad over a peer-to-peer connection and it works but the video is very choppy until I move my cursor from my Mac to my iPad to trigger Universal Control. I captured the OS logs while doing this and can confirm that something happens to trigger “realtime” mode on the AWDL connection. After that, the streaming is totally smooth with zero latency. Some log samples: 2026-03-19 12:42:01.277968-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 3 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.rapport:CLinkD] Update client from UniversalControl:697 2026-03-19 12:42:01.278031-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.CoreUtils:AsyncCnx] CLinkCnx-6089: Connect start: 'CLink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local.%13' 2026-03-19 12:42:01.278149-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.CoreUtils:AsyncCnx] CLinkCnx-6089: Querying SRV CLink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local.%13 2026-03-19 12:42:01.279454-0400 0x1ae253a Info 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:datapathInitiator] Created AWDLDatapathInitiator clink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local <To: 2e:f2:5a:15:76:52> 2026-03-19 12:42:01.279498-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.CoreUtils:AsyncCnx] CLinkCnx-6089: Resolving DNS f970afcc-1f1c-47af-a3f3-0236c9f9bbb0.local.%13 2026-03-19 12:42:01.279588-0400 0x1ae253a Default 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:datapathInitiator] AWDLDatapathInitiator clink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local <To: 2e:f2:5a:15:76:52> was started 2026-03-19 12:42:01.282537-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (Network) [com.apple.network:path] nw_path_evaluator_start [5C54D967-624D-4269-B080-6C7AE63218C7 IPv6#1e905043%awdl0.49154 generic, attribution: developer] path: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: awdl0[802.11], dns, uses wifi 2026-03-19 12:42:01.596450-0400 0x1ae253a Debug 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:driver] Received event realtimeMode 2026-03-19 12:42:01.596589-0400 0x1ae253a Default 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:interface] Realtime mode updated true I noticed that on iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 a realtime mode was added specifically to the Wi-Fi Aware API which I assume does what I want: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/waperformancemode/realtime, but I am looking for a solution that works with the existing network API and also on previous OS versions. I have already tried a lot of things, but is there any way to programmatically trigger “realtime” mode? For additional context, the goal here is to have extremely low latency that also works for gaming. The actual latency introduced in 1 is approximately 30-50ms around once a second… adding a buffer to the stream makes the video completely smooth, but the extra delay on the receiver end is not acceptable for this use case. Any help or ideas would be appreciated. I can’t easily share a reproduce case right now, and even if I could, getting multiple devices into the exact state along with the router configuration in order to reproduce is going to be pretty difficult anyway.

Apple MacOS Sequoia 15.4.1 Creates a ton of unused network interfaces and it's a nightmare trying to figure out what they all do, what theyr're linked to, etc. It appears that network links utun0, utun1, utun2, ... are never used or useful. ip link shows they are all status UNKNOWN. I don't use a VPN or anything like that, and the documentation on these interfaces does not exist. I'd like to permanently delete them and permanently prevent them from ever being created again -- how can I accomplish this task?

Hi I’m working on an app Called Wiux ( already on Android ) but one of my clients has a company with all iPhones so I need to develop the app for iOS, but I’m facing A huge wall, it’s an proactive wifi user experience monitor for distributed networks and the idea is that the app its sending every minute info about connectivity RSSI, which network , if is 2,4ghz or 5ghz channel used and device usage cpu ram etc but I find that is no getRSSI ( and I really need that data ) but some aps like iWifi or WiFi probe has that data and it works I check the reads with a phisical probe and my app on android and values match. i think maybe with NEHotspotHelper I could get the data but I don’t know how to ask to use it or if exist a dependency for quality monitoring that allows me to access that thow o info. ( And probably in the near future I face the same problem with LTE ( that I’m also monitoring with the app on Android and I think is going to be a problem on iOS )

Hello and Good day! We are conducting Bonjour Conformance Test (BCT) for Printer device. BCT result is PASSED but with warning in Multicast DNS, specifically, WARNING: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Other Shared Reply Timing is passed: PASSED: MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Environment: BCT Tool Version: 1.5.4 (15400) MacOS Sequioa 15.5 DUT Firmware : Linux Debian 9 Apple mDNSResponder 1790.80.10 Service types: _ipps._tcp, _uscans._tcp, _ipp._tcp, _uscan._tcp Router : NEC AtermWR8370N Setup: 1-to-1 [Mac->Router<-DUT connection] Based on debug.log, this is where WARNING occurs: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870187+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 26ms, max = 114ms, avg = 65.50ms WARNING 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870361+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04136: 50 percent of the replies within the correct range fell in the interval 20ms and 46ms (should be close to 25%). PASSED (SHARED REPLY TIMING) In the same debug.log for MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING is PASSED: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912334+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 22ms, max = 112ms, avg = 78.00ms DEBUG_2 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912849+0900 recv_packet 01997: received packet (558 bytes) PASSED (MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING) [Details] Looking at Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf https://download.developer.apple.com/Documentation/Bonjour_Conformance_Test_Guideline/Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf there were some differences: In 1.6.2 Expected Result: Test Result File of Test that All Tests Passed, this is not displayed: PASSED: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION And in II.8 Shared Reply Timing: (Ideally, 25% of the answers should fall in each 21ms quadrant of the range 20ms - 125ms.) and comparing to the debug.log, there was a discrepancy of the interval, because 20ms and 46ms is 26ms interval. From RFC6762 6. Responding, Ideal range is from 20ms-120ms Because of this, please advise on the questions below: I would like to know on the possible cause and resolution for these WARNINGS. And since in current BCT result, (Test result integrity signature is generated), I would like to know if this is acceptable for BCT certification. Thank you.

Error 8 in the NEHotspotConfigurationError domain is .internal, aka NEHotspotConfigurationErrorInternal. This error typically indicates that something went wrong in some sort of expected way, but we decided not to surface the exact cause [1]. This has come up a bunch of times before on the forums, and I have various titbits to share. To start, I want to address some specific cases: You’ll see this error if your app isn’t signed with the com.apple.developer.networking.HotspotConfiguration entitlement. To fix this, use Xcode’s Signing & Capabilities editor to add the Hotspot capability to your app. Historically developers reported a situation where once they encountered the error it would show up consistently, but then it would go away on restarting the device. If you see behaviour like that, that’s definitely a bug and I encourage you to file it as such. I have more about filing such bugs in Filing a Wi-Fi Bug Report. Of course, you have to wait to reproduce the error again before you’ll be able to file that bug, because the act of restarting cleared the issue. I’ve seen reports where such problems only occur on a specific type of device, for example, on iPhone 16 but not on earlier or later iPhones. That’s definitely something that Apple should investigate, and I recommend that you file a bug about it. If the problem is being reported by your users but you can’t reproduce it yourself, consider the various suggestions in Using a Sysdiagnose Log to Debug a Hard-to-Reproduce Problem. Assuming you’re still here (-: the next step is to determine whether the problem is specific to NEHotspotConfigurationManager or not. Try joining the accessory’s network from Settings > Wi-Fi. Does that also have problems? If so, that’s not something we can help you with here on the forums. The focus of the Apple Developer Forums is primarily to help developers with the APIs in Apple’s various platform SDKs [2]. We’re not set up to help accessory developers with Wi-Fi issues. However, there are still things you can do, as I explain in Filing a Wi-Fi Bug Report. At this point you have an error that: Persists across restarts Happens with all Apple devices You can reproduce Only affects NEHotspotConfigurationManager If that’s correct then there are a couple of things you might look at: Coerce the error to an NSError and print that. Does it reveal anything interesting? Also check the underlying error property (NSUnderlyingErrorKey) for hints. When reproducing the error, monitor the system log for log entries in the com.apple.networkextension subsystem. Do those offer any clues? Note For lots of hints and tips about the system log, see Your Friend the System Log. And finally, if you have questions about this case, feel free to start a thread here on the forums and we’ll try to help you out. Put it in the App & System Services > Networking subtopic and tag it with Network Extension. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" [1] There’s also the .unknown error. See this post for a brief summary of the difference. [2] And with Apple tools and some developer-oriented services. Revision History 2026-03-18 Added a missing entitlement bullet to the specific case list. 2026-03-17 First posted.

Hi, I'v got the error by using NEHotspotConfiguration to connect a wifi spot but get:NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain code=8. I hope to get the same result as when scanning the code with the system camera. A pop-up window will appear, and I just need to click "Join" to successfully connect. Here's the logs: [OneAppWifi][iOS] handleCheckWifiEnabled start (iOS 12+) [OneAppWifi][iOS] handleCheckWifiEnabled pathUpdateHandler status=satisfied [OneAppWifi][iOS] handleConnectWifi start, ssid=OPPO Find X6 Pro, pwd=len=16, authType=Optional("sae"), hidden=false [OneAppWifi][iOS] handleConnectWifi cancelPendingConnection before new request ssid=OPPO Find X6 Pro [OneAppWifi][iOS] cancelPendingConnection called, errorCode=nil, currentSsid=nil [OneAppWifi][iOS] cancelPendingConnection silent cancel, just clear pendingConnectResult [OneAppWifi][iOS] handleConnectWifi apply completion with error, domain=NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain, code=8, userInfo=["NSLocalizedDescription": internal error.] [OneAppWifi][iOS] resolveNEError NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain code=8 [OneAppWifi][iOS] resolveNEError systemConfiguration / internal, map to connection_failed [OneAppWifi][iOS] handleConnectWifi resolved as failure errorCode=Optional("connection_failed") for ssid=OPPO Find X6 Pro [OneAppWifi][iOS] firePendingResult value=["success": false, "errorCode": Optional("connection_failed")], currentSsid=Optional("OPPO Find X6 Pro")

I am investigating a connectivity issue reported by a user running latest iOS 26.4 Public Beta on an iPhone 17 Pro Max. Unfortunately, I am unable to reproduce this behavior on my end as I do not have access to an iPhone 17 Pro Max for testing, and my current devices do not exhibit the issue. However, the user's logs suggest a system-level networking issue : Symptoms: Flutter App (package dio): Requests fail with The connection errored: Failed host lookup: 'mydomain.com' Firebase SDK: Unable to fetch Firestore documents Duration: The outage is random, lasting between 5 to 15 minutes before self-resolving Scope: It affects both Wi-Fi and Cellular data By the way I found this report from another developer experiencing the exact same behavior: "I run a mobile app that has millions of users. As of 1-2 weeks ago, we started getting reports that the app isn't working (failing to connect). It then goes back to connecting anywhere between 5 to 15-20 mins later. Every single one of those users was running iOS 26.4 beta, and their phones ranged from iPhone 17 PRO Max to regular iPhone 17s, to iPhone 16 PROs and Maxs. The only other thing is that all these users also had Apple Private Relay enabled. During the time the app wasn't able to connect, other apps on their phones like YouTube, also failed to connect. The issue is persistent whether on Wifi or cellular, didn't matter. I upgraded my iPhone 16 PRO Max to iOS 26.4, and wasn't experiencing the issue. I enabled Private Relay - and a few mins later on my own phone, I couldnt connect on my own app, and YouTube/Gmail also were experincing issue. It self-resolved 5-10 mins later. But it kept happening throughout the day. I've tested Network reset, I've also re-installed the apps, both still continued to have those weird intermittent outages. I just updated the phone to the latest version that was released a day ago, so far I'm not experiencing it, but as you can imagine, this is such a weird behaviour that it's concerning for me that I can't figure out the exact way to replicate it." I asked the user to test with iCloud Private Relay disabled, and it immediately fixed the problem -> so maybe this suggests that it might be related to how Private Relay handles traffic or DNS resolution in this beta ? Are other developers seeing an increase in SocketException or host lookup failures on the 26.4 Beta? Is this a known regression related to Private Relay that is expected to be patched before the RC/Final release?

Hi Team, I want to retrieve the list of nearby Wi-Fi networks (SSIDs) directly inside the app. Currently, I can see the available Wi-Fi networks by going to Settings → Wi-Fi on the device, but I would like to access that scan list programmatically within my application. I am developing the app using the Angular Ionic platform. On Android, I am able to get the nearby Wi-Fi scan list using the npm package @capgo/capacitor-wifi (v8.1.8). However, on iOS, the scan results are not being returned. If anyone has experience with this or knows how to achieve Wi-Fi scanning on iOS in Ionic/Capacitor, please let me know. Thanks.

Hi Team, I want to retrieve the list of nearby Wi-Fi networks (SSIDs) directly inside the app. Currently, I can see the available Wi-Fi networks by going to Settings → Wi-Fi on the device, but I would like to access that scan list programmatically within my application. I am developing the app using the Angular Ionic platform. On Android, I am able to get the nearby Wi-Fi scan list using the npm package @capgo/capacitor-wifi (v8.1.8). However, on iOS, the scan results are not being returned. If anyone has experience with this or knows how to achieve Wi-Fi scanning on iOS in Ionic/Capacitor, please let me know. Thanks.

General: Forums subtopic: App & System Services > Networking DevForums tag: Network Extension Network Extension framework documentation Routing your VPN network traffic article Filtering traffic by URL sample code Filtering Network Traffic sample code TN3120 Expected use cases for Network Extension packet tunnel providers technote TN3134 Network Extension provider deployment technote TN3165 Packet Filter is not API technote Network Extension and VPN Glossary forums post Debugging a Network Extension Provider forums post Exporting a Developer ID Network Extension forums post Network Extension Framework Entitlements forums post Network Extension vs ad hoc techniques on macOS forums post Network Extension Provider Packaging forums post NWEndpoint History and Advice forums post Extra-ordinary Networking forums post Wi-Fi management: Understanding NEHotspotConfigurationErrorInternal forums post See also Networking Resources for general networking resources, including information about Wi-Fi. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com"

We have a Java application built for macOS. On the first launch, the application prompts the user to allow local network access. We've correctly added the NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription key to the Info.plist, and the provided description appears in the system prompt. After the user grants permission, the application can successfully connect to a local server using its hostname. However, the issue arises after the system is rebooted. When the application is launched again, macOS does not prompt for local network access a second time—which is expected, as the permission was already granted. Despite this, the application is unable to connect to the local server. It appears the previously granted permission is being ignored after a reboot. A temporary workaround is to manually toggle the Local Network permission off and back on via System Settings &gt; Privacy &amp; Security, which restores connectivity—until the next reboot. This behavior is highly disruptive, both for us and for a significant number of our users. We can reproduce this on multiple systems... The issues started from macOS Sequoia 15.0 By opening the application bundle using "Show Package Contents," we can launch the application via "JavaAppLauncher" without any issues. Once started, the application is able to connect to our server over the local network. This seems to bypass the granted permissions? "JavaAppLauncher" is also been used in our Info.plist file

Hello, I submitted a Network Extension entitlement request (Packet Tunnel Provider) and opened case 102837721995. The case history says Apple sent a message on March 12, but I did not receive it and cannot reply through the support portal. Could someone from Apple Developer Support check the case? Also, it is possible that I misunderstood something or submitted the wrong entitlement request. My application will use WireGuard to establish the VPN connection. If a different entitlement is required for this scenario, please let me know. Thank you.