Hi I am developing the packet tunnel extension on a SIP enabled device. If I build the app and notarize and install it on the device, it works fine. If I modify, build and execute the App (which contains the system extension), it fails with below error. 102.3.1.4 is production build. And 201.202.0.101 is for XCode build. SystemExtension "<<complete name>>.pkttunnel" request for replacement from 102.3.1.4 to 201.202.0.101 Packet Tunnel SystemExtension "<<complete name>>.pkttunnel" activation request did fail: Error Domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain Code=8 "(null)" If SIP is disabled, it works fine. Is there a way the system extension can be developed even if SIP remains enabled?

Issue summary: Iphone 16 is not connecting to WiFi7 AP with MLO Suiteb encryption. Furuno AP(EW750) is sending EAPOL M1 message, but Iphone16 is not responding with EAPOL M2 message, Hence Iphone16 is unable to connect to Qualcomm based AP with MLO suiteb encryption. Issue impact: All the Iphone16 users cannot connect to WiFi7 AP with MLO suiteb encryption globally. Predominantly, Iphone users tend to connect to more secured wifi networks using WPA3 suiteb encryption, hence many of the iphone users will experience the connectivity issue significantly. Topology: AP Hardware: Furuno WiFi7 AP(EW770) The Furuno WiFi7 AP uses Miami IPQ5332 with waikiki radio QCN9274 AP software: SPF12.2 CSU3 IPhone16 software: (18.3.1 or 18.5 ) Iphone16 wifi capabilities: 802.11 b/a/g/n/ac/ax/be Radius server details: Radius server: Laptop running with Ubuntu Radius package: 3.0.26dfsggit20220223.1.00ed0241fa-0ubuntu3.4 Version: 3.0.26 Steps: Power on the Wi-Fi 7 Access Point with the Miami chipset, and flash it with the SPF 12.2 CSU3 image. Enable both 5 GHz and 6 GHz radios on the AP. Enable MLO (Multi-Link Operation) in 6Ghz & 5Ghz, set MLD address different from radio address and configure Suite-B (192-bit) encryption On the Linux laptop, set up the RADIUS server with EAP-TLS authentication method. Once the above steps are completed, take the iPhone 16 and follow the steps below to install the RADIUS client certificates on the device. On the sniffer laptop, switch the Wi-Fi adapter to monitor mode, configure the required channel, and begin packet capture. Check SSID is broadcasting, then connect the iPhone 16 to . Verify if the client (iPhone 16) connects to the SSID using WPA3-Enterprise, MLO, and Suite-B encryption by checking the wireless capture on both the AP and iPhone sides. Support needed from Apple team: We would request Apple team to analyse and enable the IPhone16 users to connect to advanced security WPA3 Suiteb by resolving the issue. Below is our analysis and observation for your reference. As per IEEE, MLD mac address can be set to the same or different from radio address, Iphone16 is not accepting EAPOL M1 message if source address(MLD) is different from radio address. IPhone16 is accepting EAPOL M1 if the source address(MLD) is set to the same as the radio address and responds with M2 message IPhone16 is not accepting EAPOL M1 if source address(MLD) set to different from radio address and fails to respond with M2 message

Hi! We are planning to build an app for a research project that collects sensitive information (such as symptoms, photos and audio). We don't want to store this data locally on the phone or within the app but rather have it securely transferred to a safe SFTP server. Is it possible to implement this i iOS, and if so, does anyone have any recommendations on how to do this?

We're experiencing an issue with Local Network Permission. When trying to connect to a socket, the Local Network Permission alert pops up. To trigger the permission request at the start of the app, we used the following code to ask for permission and receive a callback on whether it's granted. However, this approach doesn't always trigger the permission alert, or it gets automatically dismissed after 30 seconds, only to reappear later. What could be causing this inconsistent behavior? func checkLocalNetworkPermission(_ completed: Optional<(Bool) -> Void> = .none) { DispatchQueue.global(qos: .userInitiated).async { let hostName = ProcessInfo.processInfo.hostName let isGranted = hostName.contains(".local") if let completed { DispatchQueue.main.async { completed(isGranted) } } } }

Hey! We are investigating a problem pf rules being ignored by some processes. Despite blocking all traffic, some outgoing unicast packets can be seen in tcpdump. Issue is present in MacOS 15.0.0 - 15.3.1 (Newest at the time of writing). I tested MacOS 14.7.4 and pf rules there behaved as expected. Steps to reproduce the issue: $ cat pf.conf block all $ sudo pfctl -e -F all -f ./pf.conf Password: pfctl: Use of -f option, could result in flushing of rules present in the main ruleset added by the system at startup. See /etc/pf.conf for further details. No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled rules cleared nat cleared dummynet cleared 0 tables deleted. 196 states cleared source tracking entries cleared pf: statistics cleared pf: interface flags reset pfctl: pf already enabled After executing these commands MacOS 14 will block all outgoing unicast traffic, and on MacOS 15 data can be sent to arbitrary addresses: $ ifconfig en0 en0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,SMART,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 options=6460<TSO4,TSO6,CHANNEL_IO,PARTIAL_CSUM,ZEROINVERT_CSUM> ether b6:5e:a5:c5:1e:db inet6 fe80::1090:9c8:4325:329a%en0 prefixlen 64 secured scopeid 0xe inet 192.168.50.144 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.50.255 nd6 options=201<PERFORMNUD,DAD> media: autoselect status: active $ sudo tcpdump -k A -i any -n src 192.168.50.144 tcpdump: data link type PKTAP tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v[v]... for full protocol decode listening on any, link-type PKTAP (Apple DLT_PKTAP), snapshot length 524288 bytes 12:05:12.673472 (en0, proc com.apple.geod:1286:, svc BE, out, ch, flowid 0x0, ttag 0x0, dlt 0x1, cmpgc 0x0) IP 192.168.50.144.52012 > 17.253.15.196.443: Flags [P.], seq 1888882378:1888882402, ack 3554898220, win 2048, options [nop,nop,TS val 2752050055 ecr 1291585385], length 24 12:05:13.793937 (en0, proc com.apple.WebKit:974:, eproc Safari:804:, svc BE, out, ch, flowid 0x0, ttag 0x0, dlt 0x1, cmpgc 0x0) IP 192.168.50.144.52024 > 3.65.102.105.443: Flags [P.], seq 2011312019:2011312073, ack 673002582, win 2048, options [nop,nop,TS val 777228223 ecr 484269939], length 54 Was there any change in the way pfctl is used or is this a bug? This issue affects negatively privacy features of our product.

Hi, I am trying to create an App which connects to a Device via Wifi and then has to do some HTTP Requests. Connecting to the Wifi is working properly but when I try to make an HTTP API Call I get the response that the Domain is unavailable (No Internet Connection). I created the App in Flutter on Android everything works perfectly. The packages are all iOS Compatible. But in Safari the URL works so it is probably a permission Issue. I have the Following permissions granted: NSAppTransportSecurity NSBonjourServices NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription I even have Multicast Networking When I test the App I get asked to grant the access to local Network which I am granting. I don´t know what I should do next can somebody help? Feel free to ask for more Information

When I used the iPhone 11 to scan the wifi connection, the system reported an error,   ‘’’ let config = NEHotspotConfiguration(ssid: name, passphrase: passwd, isWEP: false) let manager = NEHotspotConfigurationManager() manager.apply(config) { error in      } ’’’ NEHotspotConfigurationErrorDomain Code=8 “internal error.” , the only thins that fixes this issue it restarting the iPhone. What is the reason for this and how to solve it? Reference link: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/111638 https://cloud.tencent.com/developer/ask/sof/114654981

On iOS 18.3, I noted that partition "HTTPCookiePropertyKey: StoragePartition" is not observed to be set for cookies returned from the wkwebview cookie store. Now on 18.4 beta 4 we are now seeing those same cookies are populated with a partition property. Is there documentation for this change? Is it intended to be suddenly populated in 18.4? Now that partition property is set, HTTPCookieStorage.shared.cookies(for: serverUri) doesn't seem to return the expected cookies correctly. For context, we are using the cookies extracted from wkwebview, setting them in HTTPCookieStorage.shared and using URLSession to make network calls outside the webivew. Works fine once I forcefully set partition on the cookie to nil. More details on what the cookie looks like here: https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/16906526 Hopefully this is on your radar?

I am developing an iOS application using NWPathMonitor for network connectivity monitoring. We discovered a reproducible issue where disabling and re-enabling WiFi triggers an unexpected network status sequence. ENVIRONMENT: iOS Version: 17.x Device: iPhone (various models tested) Network Framework: NWPathMonitor from iOS Network framework STEPS TO REPRODUCE: Device connected to WiFi normally Disable WiFi via Settings or Control Center Re-enable WiFi via Settings or Control Center EXPECTED BEHAVIOR: WiFi reconnects and NWPathMonitor reports stable satisfied status ACTUAL BEHAVIOR: T+0s: WiFi re-enables, NWPathMonitor reports path.status = .satisfied T+8s: NWPathMonitor unexpectedly reports path.status = .unsatisfied with unsatisfiedReason = .notAvailable T+9-10s: NWPathMonitor reports path.status = .satisfied again Connection becomes stable afterward NETWORK PATH TIMELINE: T+0s: satisfied (IPv4: true, DNS: false) T+140ms: satisfied (IPv4: true, DNS: true) T+8.0s: unsatisfied (reason: notAvailable, no interfaces available) T+10.0s: satisfied (IPv4: true, DNS: true) KEY OBSERVATIONS: Timing consistency: unsatisfied event always occurs ~8 seconds after reconnection resolution: "Reset Network Settings" eliminates this behavior TECHNICAL QUESTIONS: What causes the 8-second delayed unsatisfied status after WiFi re-enablement? Is this expected behavior that applications should handle? Why does reset network setting in iPhone fix this issue?

I have few API's written with URLSession. Will they work in Carrier-constrained network / satellite mode ?

I am adopting Swift Concurrency in my network extension app to use Swift 6 protections. In the UI app I ended up with most of the app marked as MainActor, so that pieces of my app can keep seamless access to each other and at the same time have thread safe access. When it comes to my network extension, does it make sense to also mark most of the code as MainActor for the purposes of thread safety and seamless access of most classes to each other? I have doubts, because MainActor sounds like it should be a UI think, but network extension has no UI Of course any long or blocking operations would not be MainActor

Hi, I developed a network extension program on macOS. I tried to update the program by changing the version number. My update process was to first turn off network filtering via "NEFilterManager.sharedManager.enabled = NO", and then use "[OSSystemExtensionRequest activationRequestForExtension:bundleid queue:dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_HIGH, 0)];" to let the system replace the old network extension program. However, sometimes the old network extension process will become a zombie process like pid=86621 in the figure. As long as the zombie process exists, the network cannot be used. After about 10 minutes, it will be cleared and the network will be available. Restarting Wi-Fi can also clear the zombie process immediately. Why is this? How to avoid this problem?

Hello, I'm running into an issue while developing an iOS app that requires local network access. I’m using the latest MacBook Air M4 with macOS sequoia 15.5 and Xcode 16.1. In the iOS Simulator, my app fails to discover devices connected to the same local network. I’ve already added the necessary key to the Info.plist: NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription This app needs access to local network devices. When I run the app on a real device and M2 Chip Macbook's simulators, it works fine for local network permission as expected. However, in the M4 Chip Macbook's Simulator: The app can’t find any devices on the local network Bonjour/mDNS seems not to be working as well I’ve tried the following without success: Restarting Simulator and Mac Resetting network settings in Simulator Confirming app permissions under System Settings > Privacy & Security Has anyone else encountered this issue with the new Xcode/macOS combo? Is local network access just broken in the Simulator for now, or is there a workaround? Thanks in advance!

Hi everyone, I developed an Android version of a VPN app built with Flutter using OpenVPN, and it works perfectly on Android. However, when porting it to iOS, I’ve encountered an issue: the app connects successfully but then automatically disconnects when tested via TestFlight. We’ve already added all the necessary network extensions. Despite this, we decided to submit the app to the App Store. It’s been five days now, and the app is still 'Waiting for Review.' Could anyone share their experience deploying and working on an iOS version of a VPN app? I’d really appreciate your insights!

We have an application which is written in Swift, which activates network extension (Transparent Proxy). We want to use MDM deployment for this network system extension. Our Transparent Proxy module is a system extension, which is exposing an app proxy provider interface (We are using NETransparentProxyProvider class and in extension’s Info.plist we use com.apple.networkextension.app-proxy key.) We don’t have any remote server setup to forward the traffic, instead we open a connection with a certain localhost:port to redirect the traffic which is received in our transparent proxy. We have another module that listens to the particular localhost:port to process the traffic further. As per https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicemanagement/vpn/transparentproxy documentation, we noticed that we can use the VPN payload with app-proxy as Provider Type for Transparent Proxy. We were able to install the profile created via Jamf Pro and also while in stalling our product the Transparent Proxy gets mapped with the one which is installed via profile. However after that the network is broken and hence unable to browse anything. We are suspecting the remote server filed is causing this. So we tried creating the custom profile without remote server address for VPN payload, but we are unable to install the profile. It throws below error: 2025-02-11 16:43:55.193348+0530 0x2f880 Error 0x0 6815 0 mdmclient: (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] Failed to save configuration DGWebProxy because it is invalid: Error Domain=NEConfigurationErrorDomain Code=2 "configuration is invalid: Missing server address" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=configuration is invalid: Missing server address}
2025-02-11 16:43:55.193376+0530 0x2f880 Error 0x0 6815 0 mdmclient: (NetworkExtension) [com.apple.networkextension:] NEProfileIngestion Error occurred when saving configuration 'DGWebProxy': configuration is invalid: configuration is invalid: Missing server address 
2025-02-11 16:43:55.196159+0530 0x2f880 Error 0x0 6815 7 mdmclient: [com.apple.ManagedClient:CPDomainPlugIn] [ERROR] [0:MDMDaemon:CPDomainPlugIn:<0x2f880>] <<<<< PlugIn: InstallPayload [NEProfileIngestionPlugin] Error: Error Domain=ConfigProfilePluginDomain Code=-319 "The ‘VPN Service’ payload could not be installed. The VPN service could not be created." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=The ‘VPN Service’ payload could not be installed. The VPN service could not be created.} <<<<<
2025-02-11 16:43:55.196826+0530 0x2f880 Error 0x0 6815 7 mdmclient: [com.apple.ManagedClient:MDMDaemon] [ERROR] [0:MDMDaemon:<0x2f880>] [CE] PlugIn_InstallPayload ==> Error Domain=ConfigProfilePluginDomain Code=-319 "The ‘VPN Service’ payload could not be installed. The VPN service could not be created." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=The ‘VPN Service’ payload could not be installed. The VPN service could not be created.} Can we create MDM profile for Transparent Proxy without remote server address?

Good morning, I have been playing with he new Networking framework released in beta, and i think its amazing how powerful and simple it is. However i have been tackling some issues with it, it seems that the NetworkListener does not allow us to configure a specific endpoint for any of the protocols, UDP, TCP (QUIC, TLS) Is this intended or just not missing features as of the Beta ? I figured out how to use bonjour to get a port (as i am brand new to using Networking on macOS and Swift) I get that the use of this is mainly as a client to connect to servers, but it would make more sense to have a high level abstraction of what already exist, wouldn't it be more intuitive to configure a NetworkEndpoint that contains either a Bonjour Service or an endpoint with configured port that we can then configure on the Listener, instead of doing .service(...) ?

Hello everyone, I'm developing a macOS application with an integrated Content Filter System Extension. Both the main app and the extension are signed with a Developer ID Application provisioning profile. When building in Xcode, I'm encountering an entitlement mismatch error. I've inspected the provisioning profile using the command: security cms -D -i FilterContentExtension-prod-profile.provisionprofile | grep -A 10 com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension And found that the com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension section only contains values with the -systemextension suffix, for example: content-filter-provider-systemextension. However, when I enable Network Extension → Content Filter in Xcode, the .entitlements file is generated with: content-filter-provider. This leads to the error: "Provisioning profile 'FilterContentExtension-prod-profile' doesn't match the entitlements file’s value for the com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension entitlement." My specific questions are: Why does this error occur? How can I use the content-filter-provider entitlement? If I want to use the content-filter-provider entitlement inside com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension for my Content Filter System Extension, what should I do?

Hi everyone, I'm building a health-focused iOS and watchOS app that uses WatchConnectivity to sync real-time heart rate and core body temperature data from iPhone to Apple Watch. While the HealthKit integration works correctly on the iPhone side, I'm facing persistent issues with WatchConnectivity — the data either doesn't arrive on the Watch, or session(_:didReceiveMessage:) never gets triggered. Here's the setup: On iPhone: Using WCSession.default.sendMessage(_:replyHandler:errorHandler:) to send real-time values every few seconds. On Apple Watch: Implemented WCSessionDelegate, and session(_:didReceiveMessage:) is supposed to update the UI. Both apps have WCSession.isSupported() checks, activate the session, and assign delegates correctly. The session state shows isPaired = true and isWatchAppInstalled = true. Bluetooth and Wi-Fi are on, both devices are unlocked and nearby. Despite all this, the Watch never receives messages in real-time. Sometimes, data comes through in bulk much later or not at all. I've double-checked Info.plist configurations and made sure background modes include "Uses Bluetooth LE accessories" and "Background fetch" where appropriate. I would really appreciate guidance on: Best practices for reliable, low-latency message delivery with WatchConnectivity. Debugging steps or sample code to validate message transmission and reception. Any pitfalls related to UI updates from the delegate method. Happy to share further details. Thanks in advance!

Hello, We have a SwiftUI-based application that runs as a LaunchAgent and communicates with other internal components using Unix domain sockets (UDS). On Sequoia (macOS virtualized environment), when installing the app, we encounter the Local Network Privacy Alert, asking: "Allow [AppName] to find and connect to devices on the local network?" We are not using any actual network communication — only interprocess communication via UDS. Is there a way to prevent this system prompt, either through MDM configuration or by adjusting our socket-related implementation? Here's a brief look at our Swift/NIO usage: class ClientHandler: ChannelInboundHandler { ... public func channelRead(context: ChannelHandlerContext, data: NIOAny) { ... } ... } // init bootstrap. var bootstrap: ClientBootstrap { return ClientBootstrap(group: group) // Also tried to remove the .so_reuseaddr, the prompt was still there. .channelOption(ChannelOptions.socketOption(.so_reuseaddr), value: 1) .channelInitializer { channel in // Add ChannelInboundHandler reader. channel.pipeline.addHandler(ClientHandler()) } } // connect to the UDS. self.bootstrap.connect(unixDomainSocketPath: self.path).whenSuccess { (channel) in .. self.channel = channel } ... ... // Send some data. self.channel?.writeAndFlush(buffer).wait() Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Hello, I have been testing my app in iOS 18 device and while creating a server with TCP, then apple make a request for local network permission automatically. If we don't allow the permission, the connection not working. We are getting the connection timeout error even after allowing again from device setting. Has something changed in the flow for iOS 18 version? Can someone help me to solve this issue?