If you are experiencing an unexpected or inconsistent behavior when using the App Store Server Library, review the following resources to ensure that your implementation workflow didn’t cause the issue: Simplifying your implementation by using the App Store Server Library Explore App Store server APIs for In-App Purchase Meet the App Store Server Library If you are unable to resolve your issue using the above resources, file a GitHub issue. Alternatively, if you wish to provide specific requests, transactions, or other private information for review, submit a Feedback Assistant report with the following information: The bundleId or appAppleId of your app The date and time your issue occurred The library language(s) The version of the library The environment (i.e., Production, Sandbox, or Xcode) The GitHub issue for this report if available The endpoint(s) reproducing your issue The HTTP body and headers of the endpoint raw request The HTTP body and headers of the endpoint response To submit the report, perform these steps: Log into Feedback Assistant. Click on the Compose icon to create a new report. Select the Developer Tools & Resources topic. In the sheet that appears: Enter a title for your report. Select “App Store Server Library” from the “Which area are you seeing an issue with?” pop-up menu. Select “Incorrect/Unexpected Behavior” from the “What type of feedback are you reporting?” pop-up menu. Enter a description of your issue and how to reproduce it. Add the information gathered above to the sheet. Submit your report. After filing your report, please respond in your existing Developer Forums post with the Feedback Assistant ID. Use your Feedback Assistant ID to check for updates or resolutions. For more information, see Understanding feedback status.

To receive server notifications from the App Store, follow the instructions in Enabling App Store Server Notifications. If your server doesn’t receive any notifications, check your server logs for any incoming web request issues, and confirm that your server supports the Transport Layer Security (TLS) 1.2 protocol or later. If you implement version 2 of App Store Server Notifications, call the Get Notification History endpoint. If there is an issue sending a notification, the endpoint returns the error the App Store received from your server. If your issue persists, submit a Feedback Assistant report with the following information: The bundleId or appAppleId of your app The date and time your issue occurred The raw HTTP body of your notification The affected transactionId(s) if applicable The version of App Store Server Notifications (i.e., Version 1 or Version 2) The environment (i.e., Production or Sandbox) To submit the report, perform these steps: Log into Feedback Assistant. Click on the Compose icon to create a new report. Select the Developer Tools & Resources topic. In the sheet that appears: Enter a title for your report. Select “App Store Server Notifications” from the “Which area are you seeing an issue with?” pop-up menu. Select “Incorrect/Unexpected Behavior” from the “What type of feedback are you reporting?” pop-up menu. Enter a description of your issue. Add the information gathered above to the sheet. Submit your report. After filing your report, please respond in your existing Developer Forums post with the Feedback Assistant ID. Use your Feedback Assistant ID to check for updates or resolutions. For more information, see Understanding feedback status.

I referred to the official documentation, but when I tried printing logs, it did not show that the event was triggered. Did I miss something? Documentation: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appkit/nsresponder/changemode(with:) My code:(Objective-C) https://github.com/yesseecity/apple-pencil-test Devices: Macbook Pro 13 inch (M1), Mac OS: 15.2 iPad air 13 inch (M2), iPad OS: 18.2 Apple Pencil Pro

we have three problem when using the push notification on Live Activity. 1. What is the specific callback strategy for the activityUpdates property in ActivityKit? We found that in actual user scenarios, there is a probability that we may not receive callbacks. From the community experience, there are some resource optimization strategies that do not perform callbacks. From this perspective, the explanation is kind of vague. Is there any clear feedback to understand why callbacks are performed/not performed? 2.what is the specific description of the wake-up strategy, when background app receive Live Activity offline start Push? From community experience, we can see that the system may wake up for a duration of 0-30s due to resource optimization strategies, or not wake up/not deal with it. Is there an official description of the wake-up strategy? or we also have to follow this description: Wake up of apps using content-available pushes are heavily throttled. You can expect 1-2 wakeup per hour as a best case scenario in the hands of your users. so this cannot be assumed to be a reliable wake-up on demand mechanism for an app. 3 How can we determine user have selected (allow or always allow) of the Live Activity permission? When we use real-time activity offline push, there are two system prompts in iOS: the first prompt : allow and disallow real-time activity the second prompt : always allow and disallow Is there an interface that can directly determine which permission the user has chosen (allow/always allow)? (By the way, we can get disallow status). At present, we haven't seen any interface in the official documentation/interface that can determine (allow/always allow). The difference here will affect the generation of Update Token. Without Update Token, we can not update our activity instance.

Hi All, I would like to develop a small macOS app using swift. I want to use ImageCaptureCore to access and control connected scanners ( via usb). I followed the official docs and wrote this ScannerManager. The code seems to be working without issues or warnings. I added the Hardened Runtime capability and both com.apple.security.personal-information.photos-library and com.apple.security.device.usb to the .entitlements file. As well added NSCameraUsageDescription to the Info.plist. Problem: None of my scanners do get detected (tested 2 different models). Of course, they are connected and do get recognized by the Image Capture App (and work as expected) and are listed in the systems app, too. When I connect my phone it does get detected by the func deviceBrowser(_ browser: ICDeviceBrowser, didAdd... delegate function. Thats why I believe my code is working but the app is lacking permissions to detect scanners somehow. Does anyone know something about this? I am using macOS 15.1.1 (24B91) on a M1 Pro. Many thanks in advance! class ScannerManager: NSObject, ICDeviceBrowserDelegate, ICDeviceDelegate { let deviceBrowser: ICDeviceBrowser private var currentDevice: ICDevice? private var scannerDeviceDelegate: ScannerDeviceDelegate? var isScanning = false var scanners: [ICDevice] = [] // MARK: - Initialization override init() { print("🚀 Initializing ScannerManager...") self.deviceBrowser = ICDeviceBrowser() super.init() self.deviceBrowser.delegate = self // Log the initial browsed device type mask self.deviceBrowser.browsedDeviceTypeMask = .scanner print("🔍 Starting device browser...") self.deviceBrowser.start() // Enhanced device logging if let devices = deviceBrowser.devices { print("\n📱 Connected devices overview:") print("Total devices found: \(devices.count)") if devices.isEmpty { print("⚠️ No devices currently connected") } else { devices.forEach { device in print("\n📌 Device Details:") print(" - Name: \(device.name ?? "unnamed")") print(" - Type: \(String(describing: device.type))") print(" - Transport Type: \(String(describing: device.transportType))") print(" - Status: \(device.hasOpenSession ? "In Use" : "Available")") print(" - Persistent ID: \(String(describing: device.persistentIDString))") print(" - Location: \(device.locationDescription ?? "Unknown")") print(" - Capabilities: \(String(describing: device.capabilities))") } } } else { print("⚠️ Unable to access device list") } } ...

Since updating to M4 Pro MBP running MacOS 15.2 and now 15.3 beta, predictive text and auto completion does not show in any apps on my computer. This all worked on previous M3 Pro MBP. Predictive text/auto completion is not working in any Microsoft apps either, and my settings are missing certain elements that my wife's M3 MBP show in Outlook. Any help would be appreciated.

Am showing daily screen-time of a user in my app in Device Activity Report Extension. The only way to get that is to sum up all the activityDuration of apps/categories/domains. But it differs a lot from phone's settings screen-time, why? I have debugged in details and counted manually the time spent on each app and it turned out that the calculation is appearing correctly in my app but Phone settings showing quite less time on top (Day).

I'd like to set up a communication mechanism between the Ui test runner and my iOS app. The purpose is to be able to collect some custom performance metrics in addition to standard ones like scrollingAndDecelerationMetric. Let's say we measure some specific intervals in our code using signposts, then serialize the result into a structured payload and report it back to the runner. So, are there any good options for that kind of IPC? The primary concern is running on Simulator. However, since it is not a regular UI test but more a performance UI test, and it is usually recommended to run those on a real device, with release optimizations/flags in place, I wonder if it is feasible to have it for device too.

The UIApplication background task mechanism allows you to prevent your app from being suspended for short periods of time. While the API involved is quite small, there’s still a bunch of things to watch out for. The name background task is somewhat misappropriate. Specifically, beginBackgroundTask(expirationHandler:) doesn’t actually start any sort of background task, but rather it tells the system that you have started some ongoing work that you want to continue even if your app is in the background. You still have to write the code to create and manage that work. So it’s best to think of the background task API as raising a “don’t suspend me” assertion. You must end every background task that you begin. Failure to do so will result in your app being killed by the watchdog. For this reason I recommend that you attach a name to each background task you start (by calling beginBackgroundTask(withName:expirationHandler:) rather than beginBackgroundTask(expirationHandler:)). A good name is critical for tracking down problems when things go wrong. IMPORTANT Failing to end a background task is the number one cause of background task problems on iOS. This usually involves some easy-to-overlook error in bookkeeping that results in the app begining a background task and not ending it. For example, you might have a property that stores your current background task identifier (of type UIBackgroundTaskIdentifier). If you accidentally creates a second background task and store it in that property without calling endBackgroundTask on the identifier that’s currently stored there, the app will ‘leak’ a background task, something that will get it killed by the watchdog. One way to avoid this is to wrap the background task in an object; see the QRunInBackgroundAssertion post on this thread for an example. Background tasks can end in one of two ways: When your app has finished doing whatever it set out to do. When the system calls the task’s expiry handler. Your code is responsible for calling endBackgroundTask(_:) in both cases. All background tasks must have an expiry handler that the system can use to ‘call in’ the task. The background task API allows the system to do that at any time. Your expiry handler is your opportunity to clean things up. It should not return until everything is actually cleaned up. It must run quickly, that is, in less than a second or so. If it takes too long, your app will be killed by the watchdog. Your expiry handler is called on the main thread. It is legal to begin and end background tasks on any thread, but doing this from a secondary thread can be tricky because you have to coordinate that work with the expiry handler, which is always called on the main thread. The system puts strict limits on the total amount of time that you can prevent suspension using background tasks. On current systems you can expect about 30 seconds. IMPORTANT I’m quoting these numbers just to give you a rough idea of what to expect. The target values have changed in the past and may well change in the future, and the amount of time you actually get depends on the state of the system. The thing to remember here is that the exact value doesn’t matter as long as your background tasks have a functional expiry handler. You can get a rough estimate of the amount of time available to you by looking at UIApplication’s backgroundTimeRemaining property. IMPORTANT The value returned by backgroundTimeRemaining is an estimate and can change at any time. You must design your app to function correctly regardless of the value returned. It’s reasonable to use this property for debugging but we strongly recommend that you avoid using as part of your app’s logic. IMPORTANT Basing app behaviour on the value returned by backgroundTimeRemaining is the number two cause of background task problems on iOS. The system does not guarantee any background task execution time. It’s possible (albeit unlikely, as covered in the next point) that you’ll be unable to create a background task. And even if you do manage to create one, its expiry handler can be called at any time. beginBackgroundTask(expirationHandler:) can fail, returning UIBackgroundTaskInvalid, to indicate that you the system is unable to create a background task. While this was a real possibility when background tasks were first introduced, where some devices did not support multitasking, you’re unlikely to see this on modern systems. The background time ‘clock’ only starts to tick when the background task becomes effective. For example, if you start a background task while the app is in the foreground and then stay in the foreground, the background task remains dormant until your app moves to the background. This can help simplify your background task tracking logic. The amount of background execution time you get is a property of your app, not a property of the background tasks themselves. For example, starting two background task in a row won’t give you 60 seconds of background execution time. Notwithstanding the previous point, it can still make sense to create multiple background tasks, just to help with your tracking logic. For example, it’s common to create a background task for each job being done by your app, ending the task when the job is done. Do not create too many background tasks. How many is too many? It’s absolutely fine to create tens of background tasks but creating thousands is not a good idea. IMPORTANT iOS 11 introduced a hard limit on the number of background task assertions a process can have (currently about 1000, but the specific value may change in the future). If you see a crash report with the exception code 0xbada5e47, you’ve hit that limit. Note The practical limit that you’re most likely to see here is the time taken to call your expiry handlers. The watchdog has a strict limit (a few seconds) on the total amount of time taken to run background task expiry handlers. If you have thousands of handlers, you may well run into this limit. If you’re working in a context where you don’t have access to UIApplication (an app extension or on watchOS) you can achieve a similar effect using the performExpiringActivity(withReason:using:) method on ProcessInfo. If your app ‘leaks’ a background task, it may end up being killed by the watchdog. This results in a crash report with the exception code 0x8badf00d (“ate bad food”). IMPORTANT A leaked background task is not the only reason for an 0x8badf00d crash. You should look at the backtrace of the main thread to see if the main thread is stuck in your code, for example, in a synchronous networking request. If, however, the main thread is happily blocked in the run loop, a leaked background task should be your primary suspect. Prior to iOS 11 information about any outstanding background tasks would appear in the resulting crash report (look for the text BKProcessAssertion). This information is not included by iOS 11 and later, but you can find equivalent information in the system log. The system log is very noisy so it’s important that you give each of your background tasks an easy-to-find name. For more system log hints and tips, see Your Friend the System Log. iOS 13 introduced the Background Tasks framework. This supports two type of requests: The BGAppRefreshTaskRequest class subsumes UIKit’s older background app refresh functionality. The BGProcessingTaskRequest class lets you request extended background execution time, typically overnight. WWDC 2020 Session 10063 Background execution demystified is an excellent summary of iOS’s background execution model. Watch it, learn it, love it! For more background execution hints and tips, see Background Tasks Resources. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" Revision History 2023-06-16 Added a link to my QRunInBackgroundAssertion post. 2022-06-08 Corrected a serious error in the discussion of BGProcessingTaskRequest. Replaced the basic system log info with a reference to Your Friend the System Log. Added a link to Background Tasks Resources. Made other minor editorial changes. 2021-02-27 Fixed the formatting. Added a reference to the Background Tasks framework and the Background execution demystified WWDC presentation. Minor editorial changes. 2019-01-20 Added a note about changes in the iOS 13 beta. Added a short discussion about beginning and ending background tasks on a secondary thread. 2018-02-28 Updated the task name discussion to account for iOS 11 changes. Added a section on how to debug ‘leaked’ background tasks. 2017-10-31 Added a note about iOS 11’s background task limit. 2017-09-12 Numerous updates to clarify various points. 2017-08-17 First posted.

Hi, I'm developer in fintech company, we have setup process for onboarding merchants for our partner and processing payments with usage of Apple Pay API. Daily system is processing ca. 10k payments but every day ca. 100 of transactions are declined because of merchant validation error: request to https://apple-pay-gateway.apple.com/paymentservices/paymentSession (with all required parameters in body) is returning response with status code 417 "statusMessage": "Payment Services Exception merchantId={root merchant id} unauthorized to process transactions on behalf of merchantId={merchant id hash} reason={merchant id hash} is not a registered merchant in WWDR and isn't properly authorized via Mass Enablement, either." Issue impacts recurring merchants, most of their transactions are processed successfully but randomly some of them are failing with such reason. All prerequisites are met: merchant have deployed 'apple-developer-merchantid-domain-association' certificate, certificates are valid and not expired. Apple Support is not able to provide any information based on provided requests timestamps. We would to know what may be the reason just part of the requests are failing and what 417 error code means.

I've been stuck for days trying to figure out how to extract the full text of a Siri prompt that launches my app. We need to be able to get the text of the full command, such as "Hey siri, buy dogfood...." so I can get "dogfood" or anything else following 'buy' . The examples I am finding are a) out of date or b) incomplelete. Right now we're using AppIntents with Shortcuts, but have to use dedicated shortcuts for each specific purchase, which are obviously very limiting.

Is there a way to distinguish physical mouse/keyboard input from remote control mouse/keyboard input on Mac? Or even better, is there a way to detect if my Mac is being remotely controlled?

At present, I am using the avfoundation external device API to connect my iPad to a DSLR camera for data collection. On my end, I am using AVCapture Video Data Output to obtain raw data for processing and rendering. However, the pixelbuf returned from the system layer is incomplete, with only a portion cropped in the middle. But using the Mac API is normal. I would like to ask how to obtain the complete pixelbuf of the image on iPad

Can i, personally, create .pkpass for other companies using my apple developer ID? In order to create .pkpass, I need to create passTypIdentifier and teamIdentifier using apple developer ID Is it okay to create those two identifiers and create coupons or membership cards for other companies? I just wonder if it is against the law or developer guide.

I have a SwiftData model where I need to customize behavior based on the value of a property (connectorType). Here’s a simplified version of my model: @Model public final class ConnectorModel { public var connectorType: String ... func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { ... } } I’d like to implement doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType in a way that allows the behavior to vary depending on connectorType, and I want to follow best practices for scalability and maintainability. I’ve come up with three potential solutions, each with pros and cons, and I’d love to hear your thoughts on which one makes the most sense or if there’s a better approach: **Option 1: Use switch Statements ** func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { switch connectorType { case "HTTP": // HTTP-specific logic case "WebSocket": // WebSocket-specific logic default: // Fallback logic } } Pros: Simple to implement and keeps the SwiftData model observable by SwiftUI without any additional wrapping. Cons: If more behaviors or methods are added, the code could become messy and harder to maintain. **Option 2: Use a Wrapper with Inheritance around swiftdata model ** @Observable class ParentConnector { var connectorModel: ConnectorModel init(connectorModel: ConnectorModel) { self.connectorModel = connectorModel } func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { fatalError("Not implemented") } } @Observable class HTTPConnector: ParentConnector { override func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { // HTTP-specific logic } } Pros: Logic for each connector type is cleanly organized in subclasses, making it easy to extend and maintain. Cons: Requires introducing additional observable classes, which could add unnecessary complexity. **Option 3: Use a @Transient class that customizes behavior ** protocol ConnectorProtocol { func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType(connectorModel: ConnectorModel) } class HTTPConnectorImplementation: ConnectorProtocol { func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType(connectorModel: ConnectorModel) { // HTTP-specific logic } } Then add this to the model: @Model public final class ConnectorModel { public var connectorType: String @Transient public var connectorImplementation: ConnectorProtocol? // Or alternatively from swiftui I could call myModel.connectorImplementation.doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() to avoid this wrapper func doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType() { connectorImplementation?.doSomethingDifferentForEveryConnectorType(connectorModel: self) } } Pros: Decouples model logic from connector-specific behavior. Avoids creating additional observable classes and allows for easy extension. Cons: Requires explicitly passing the model to the protocol implementation, and setup for determining the correct implementation needs to be handled elsewhere. My Questions Which approach aligns best with SwiftData and SwiftUI best practices, especially for scalable and maintainable apps? Are there better alternatives that I haven’t considered? If Option 3 (protocol with dependency injection) is preferred, what’s the best way to a)manage the transient property 2) set the correct implementation and 3) pass reference to swiftdata model? Thanks in advance for your advice!

Esim activation. Assuming I already have card data, I use the universal link https://esimsetup.apple.com/esim_qrcode_provisioning?carddata= to install it. However, it always ends up in the system Settings app. The flow: 1. Click the link -> 2. Redirect to Settings -> 3. Show activation dialog. Is there anyway to make the activation flow stay within the app? I couldn't find any documentation for that. This is an example from Revolut app, where the whole flow above happens without leaving the app.

Greetings! I was reviewing the documentation for the Apple Store Server Notification v1 APIs and saw the deprecation notice. We are currently unable to migrate to v2 in the near future. With that in mind, I want to know if there were any plans to shut off v1, and if so, was there any timeline we could expect? Thank you in advance. Reference: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appstoreservernotifications/app-store-server-notifications-version-1

I am needing to add/delete shortcuts in our app without using the Add to Siri button. But have been stymied at every turn. The most recent example is some code that uses an "AppShortcutCenter" call, supposedly added in iOS 17. But there is no such thing as that which I can find. What gives, and what's needed to do custom shortcuts on demand programmatically?

You are probably aware of the upcoming root certificate change for any servers you might have that you use to send push notifications by connection to APNs. If you are not, here is the announcement. We have been getting some questions about this, and understand not everyone is familiar with their server setup. First, we would like to clarify that this is only a change to your server's certificate trust store. You do not need to update anything else, like your APNs push certificates, the build certificates and provisioning profiles for your team/app, and so on. All you need to do is to install the mentioned new root certificate to your push server's trust store. If you are using a 3rd party push provider, it is them who will need to handle their servers. But you may want to double check with them nevertheless. If you are managing your own push servers that connect to APNs directly, then it is your responsibility to download and install the root certificate mentioned in the above link on your server(s). Unfortunately we cannot provide specific instructions on how to install this root certificate on every kind of server out there. Each server operating system/push server software will have different ways these root certificates are installed, which is out of scope of our support abilities. If you are not sure how to do this, I would recommend you seek help for this from your server-side developers or server admins. Or, if you don't have access to such resources, you can ask the support channels for your system the question: How do I install a root certificate? We have setup a test server at 17.188.143.34:443 that you can use to try and send pushes to test whether your new root certificate is correctly installed. An alternative way to test this would be, from a terminal prompt: openssl s_client -connect 17.188.143.34:443 -servername api.sandbox.push.apple.com -verifyCAfile USERTrustRSACertificationAuthority.crt -showcerts Change the parameter to the -verifyCAfile argument to point to your trust store, and it should allow you to validate Sample return results would be: Connecting to 17.188.143.34 CONNECTED(00000003) depth=2 C=US, ST=New Jersey, L=Jersey City, O=The USERTRUST Network, CN=USERTrust RSA Certification Authority verify return:1 depth=1 CN=Apple Public Server RSA CA 11 - G1, O=Apple Inc., ST=California, C=US verify return:1 depth=0 C=US, ST=California, O=Apple Inc., CN=api.sandbox.push.apple.com verify return:1 Argun Tekant /  DTS Engineer / Core Technologies

How to encrypt bytes with CCM method in KMP?