Posts under App & System Services topic

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

public API which allows to get information about APFS
Hello, I am working on a daemon which collects information about disk space usage on macOS. APFS has quite complex structure and there is a challenge to get detailed info. My application must provide disk usage by APFS containers. Are there any recommended way to get space usage by particular APFS volume? Are there any recommended way to get free space on particular APFS container? Are there any recommended way to enumerate APFS containers and volumes? I am using Disk Arbitration to get APFS info. However, I get restricted info about space usage because I get get disk usage for mounted volumes only. Are there any public API (daemon-safe) which allows to easily get disk space usage on macOS? Thank you in advance, Pavel
6
0
235
May ’25
SMAppService getting notified when status changes externally (from System Settings)
Say I want to sync a toggle in my app with SMAppService's .status property. If the status changes from my app I can track it. But if user toggles it from System Settings, I don't see a notification so then the UI in my app is out of date. The status property is not key value observable and there doesn't appear to be a SMAppServiceStatusDidChangeNotification ? I can re-read it every time my app will become active but feels kind of wrong to do it this way.
2
0
190
May ’25
TCP/IP Connection Reset --- request Timeout
send a request and it returns with timeout Integration Team are Using Fortigate as a firewall and NGINX for some reasons so we use VPN TO Access , requests always succeed but at once it failed with timeout in randomize request not specific one we are using URLSession as a network layer when I retry the same failed request again, it success the request cannot connect apigee Sec Team concern { app session hits the security gateway with lots of SYN step to try to initiate a new session and doesn’t wait for (SYN-ACK / ACK) steps to happen to make sure the connection initiated correctly and gateway consider it flooding attack }
4
1
140
May ’25
Inquiry regarding StoreKit Messages for Free Trial Conversion and Recurring Payment Consent in South Korea
Dear Apple Developer Support, Our iOS application offers subscriptions with a free trial period. We understand that in South Korea, due to local subscription regulations, users must explicitly provide consent for recurring payments before the subscription converts from a free trial to a paid period. We have the following questions regarding how StoreKit handles this scenario: When a free trial is about to convert to a paid subscription for a user in South Korea, does StoreKit send a StoreKit.Message (or SKStorefront.Message) to the application to obtain the required consent for recurring payments? If such a message is sent, would the Reason for this message be StoreKit.Message.Reason.priceIncreaseConsent, or would it be another specific reason related to initial recurring payment consent after a trial? If our application receives such a message and we choose to defer its display, what is the maximum recommended or permissible deferral period? Is it possible to save the data of a received StoreKit.Message and display it to the user at a later time, for instance, after the application has been closed and subsequently reopened? Are there any best practices or limitations regarding this? We need this information to ensure our application correctly handles these consent requirements in compliance with South Korean policies and provides a smooth user experience. Thank you for your guidance.
1
0
147
May ’25
NFC HCE CardSession.isSupported crash
I am getting report of a crash occurring, while doing a NFC HCE CardSession. The swift code is mostly the same as the example from the CardSession docs: @objc func deviceSupportsNFC (_ call: CAPPluginCall) { call.keepAlive = true let supportsNFCCallbackId = call.callbackId! Task() { guard NFCReaderSession.readingAvailable, CardSession.isSupported, // <-- line 86 await CardSession.isEligible else { print(TAG + " HCE not allowed/available") var support = JSObject() support["supported"] = false; let callback = bridge?.savedCall(withID: supportsNFCCallbackId) call.resolve(); callback?.resolve(support); return; } print(TAG + " HCE allowed") var support = JSObject() support["supported"] = true; let callback = bridge?.savedCall(withID: supportsNFCCallbackId) call.resolve(); callback?.resolve(support); } } Calling it from my plugin, to verify if (HCE) NFC is supported: if(await deviceInfoService.isIos()) { if(iosSupportEnabled === false) { console.log("NfcHceService:iOS but disabled"); return; } this.requiresManualTrigger = true; DfsNfcHce.deviceSupportsNFC((supportObj) => { const support = supportObj?.supported ?? false; this.hceSupported = support; }); } else { this.hceSupported = true; } The crash report i get via Crashlytics is below. It's specifying the error occurs at line 86 (marked it in my code above) The error seems to be in the CoreNFC (NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported). # Crashlytics - Stack trace # Application: com.wodanbrothers.dyflexis # Platform: apple # Version: 2025.04.101356 (1744977392) # Issue: c3a293fbfa73c64f59f92c4b4cdfeb83 # Session: 5c64465c452c41e3abb1ba9f970b54c0_DNE_0_v2 # Date: Wed May 07 2025 07:56:11 GMT+0200 (Central European Summer Time) Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException 0 CoreFoundation 0x11a2ec __exceptionPreprocess 1 libobjc.A.dylib 0x31a7c objc_exception_throw 2 CoreFoundation 0x18467c +[NSObject(NSObject) _copyDescription] 3 CoreFoundation 0x31b84 ___forwarding___ 4 CoreFoundation 0x314f0 _CF_forwarding_prep_0 5 CoreNFC 0x2ac40 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:outError:] 6 CoreNFC 0x2b184 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:expiry:completion:] 7 CoreNFC 0x2f9d8 block_destroy_helper.5 8 Dyflexis 0x5c08 closure #1 in DfsNfcHcePlugin.deviceSupportsNFC(_:) + 86 (DfsNfcHcePlugin.swift:86) 9 Dyflexis 0x7f8d <deduplicated_symbol> 10 Dyflexis 0x7725 specialized thunk for @escaping @isolated(any) @callee_guaranteed @async () -> (@out A) (<compiler-generated>) 11 Dyflexis 0x77fd <deduplicated_symbol> 12 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x65241 completeTaskWithClosure(swift::AsyncContext*, swift::SwiftError ... Crashed: com.google.firebase.crashlytics.ios.exception 0 FirebaseCrashlytics 0x1b658 FIRCLSProcessRecordAllThreads + 172 1 FirebaseCrashlytics 0x1ba64 FIRCLSProcessRecordAllThreads + 1208 2 FirebaseCrashlytics 0x13adc FIRCLSHandler + 48 3 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xe9d4 __FIRCLSExceptionRecord_block_invoke + 92 4 libdispatch.dylib 0x1b584 _dispatch_client_callout + 16 5 libdispatch.dylib 0x11728 _dispatch_lane_barrier_sync_invoke_and_complete + 56 6 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xe260 FIRCLSExceptionRecord + 204 7 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xe4f8 FIRCLSExceptionRecordNSException + 452 8 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xdeb8 FIRCLSTerminateHandler() + 396 9 libc++abi.dylib 0x158b4 std::__terminate(void (*)()) + 16 10 libc++abi.dylib 0x18e1c __cxa_get_exception_ptr + 86 11 libc++abi.dylib 0x18dc4 __cxxabiv1::failed_throw(__cxxabiv1::__cxa_exception*) + 90 12 libobjc.A.dylib 0x31be4 objc_exception_throw + 448 13 CoreFoundation 0x18467c +[NSObject(NSObject) _copyDescription] + 362 14 CoreFoundation 0x31b84 ___forwarding___ + 1492 15 CoreFoundation 0x314f0 _CF_forwarding_prep_0 + 96 16 CoreNFC 0x2ac40 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:outError:] + 364 17 CoreNFC 0x2b184 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:expiry:completion:] + 96 18 CoreNFC 0x2f9d8 block_destroy_helper.5 + 8028 19 Dyflexis 0x5c08 closure #1 in DfsNfcHcePlugin.deviceSupportsNFC(_:) + 86 (DfsNfcHcePlugin.swift:86) 20 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x5c134 swift::runJobInEstablishedExecutorContext(swift::Job*) + 292 21 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x5d5c8 swift_job_runImpl(swift::Job*, swift::SerialExecutorRef) + 156 22 libdispatch.dylib 0x13db0 _dispatch_root_queue_drain + 364 23 libdispatch.dylib 0x1454c _dispatch_worker_thread2 + 156 24 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x4624 _pthread_wqthread + 232 25 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x19f8 start_wqthread + 8 ...
1
0
237
May ’25
Persistent CloudKit Server-to-Server INTERNAL_ERROR (500) Despite Correct Key Parsing & Request Formatting for /users/current
Hello Devs, I'm encountering a persistent INTERNAL_ERROR (HTTP 500) when making Server-to-Server API calls to CloudKit, specifically when trying to hit the /users/current endpoint, even after meticulously verifying all client-side components. I'm hoping someone might have insight into what could cause this. Context: Goal: Authenticate to CloudKit from a Vercel Serverless Function (Node.js) to perform operations like record queries. Problem Endpoint: POST https://api.apple-cloudkit.com/database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Key Generation Method: Using the CloudKit Dashboard's "Tokens &amp; Keys" -&gt; "New Server-to-Server Key" flow, where I generate the private key using openssl ecparam -name prime256v1 -genkey -noout -out mykey.pem, then extract the public key using openssl ec -in mykey.pem -pubout, and paste the public key material (between BEGIN/END markers) into the dashboard. The private key was then converted to PKCS#8 format using openssl pkcs8 -topk8 -nocrypt -in mykey.pem -out mykey_pkcs8.pem. Current Setup Being Tested (in a Vercel Node.js function): CLOUDKIT_CONTAINER: iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball CLOUDKIT_KEY_ID: 9368dddf141ce9bc0da743b9f69bc3eda132b9bb3e62a4167e428d4f320b656e (This is the Key ID generated from the CloudKit Dashboard for the public key I provided). CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY (Environment Variable): Contains the base64 encoded string of the entire content of my PKCS#8 formatted private key file. Key Processing in Code: const p8Base64 = process.env.CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY; const privateKeyPEM = Buffer.from(p8Base64, 'base64').toString('utf8'); // This privateKeyPEM string starts with "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----" and ends with "-----END PRIVATE KEY-----" const privateKey = crypto.createPrivateKey({ key: privateKeyPEM, format: 'pem' }); // This line SUCCEEDS without DECODER errors in my Vercel function logs. Use code with caution. JavaScript Request Body for /users/current: "{}" Signing String (message = Date:BodyHash:Path): Date: Correct ISO8601 format (e.g., "2025-05-21T19:38:11.886Z") BodyHash: Correct SHA256 hash of "{}", then Base64 encoded (e.g., "RBNvo1WzZ4oRRq0W9+hknpT7T8If536DEMBg9hyq/4o=") Path: Exactly /database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Headers: X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-KeyID: Set to the correct Key ID. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-ISO8601Date: Set to the date used in the signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-SignatureV1: Set to the generated signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Environment: "production" Content-Type: "application/json" Observed Behavior &amp; Logs: The Node.js crypto.createPrivateKey call successfully parses the decoded PEM key in my Vercel function. The request is sent to CloudKit. CloudKit responds with HTTP 500 and the following JSON body (UUID varies per request): { "uuid": "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx", "serverErrorCode": "INTERNAL_ERROR" } Use code with caution. Json This happens consistently. Previously, with other key pairs or different P8 processing attempts, I was getting AUTHENTICATION_FAILED (401) or local DECODER errors. Now that the key parsing is successful on my end with this current key pair and setup, I'm hitting this INTERNAL_ERROR. Troubleshooting Done: Verified Key ID (9368dddf...) is correct and corresponds to the key generated via CloudKit Dashboard. Verified Container ID (iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball) is correct. Successfully parsed the private key from the environment variable (after base64 decoding) within the Vercel function. Meticulously checked the signing string components (Date, BodyHash, Path) against Apple's documentation. Path format is /database/1////. Ensured all required headers are present with correct values. Local Node.js tests (bypassing Vercel but using the same key data and signing logic) also result in this INTERNAL_ERROR. Question: What could cause CloudKit to return an INTERNAL_ERROR (500) for a /users/current request when the client-side key parsing is successful and all request components (path, body hash for signature, date, headers) appear to conform exactly to the Server-to-Server Web Services Reference? Are there any known subtle issues with EC keys generated via openssl ecparam (and then converted to PKCS#8) that might lead to this, even if crypto.createPrivateKey parses them in Node.js? Could there be an issue with my specific Key ID or container that would manifest this way, requiring Apple intervention? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can provide more detailed logs of the request components if needed. Thank you!
1
1
173
May ’25
LaunchAgent can't connect to CloudKit daemon
For this code: let status = try await container.accountStatus() Seeing this error: 2025-05-08 15:32:00.945731-0500 localhost myAgent[2661]: (myDaemon.debug.dylib) [com.myDaemon.cli:networking] Error Domain=CKErrorDomain Code=6 "Error connecting to CloudKit daemon. This could happen for many reasons, for example a daemon exit, a device reboot, a race with the connection inactivity monitor, invalid entitlements, and more. Check the logs around this time to investigate the cause of this error." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Error connecting to CloudKit daemon. This could happen for many reasons, for example a daemon exit, a device reboot, a race with the connection inactivity monitor, invalid entitlements, and more. Check the logs around this time to investigate the cause of this error., CKRetryAfter=5, CKErrorDescription=Error connecting to CloudKit daemon. This could happen for many reasons, for example a daemon exit, a device reboot, a race with the connection inactivity monitor, invalid entitlements, and more. Check the logs around this time to investigate the cause of this error., NSUnderlyingError=0x600001bfc270 {Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 UserInfo={NSDebugDescription= I initially started the this process as System Daemon to see what would happen (which obviously does not have CloudKit features). Then moved it back to /Library/LaunchAgents/ and can't get rid of that error. I see also following message from CloudKit daemon: Ignoring failed attempt to get container proxy for &lt;private&gt;: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=&lt;private&gt;} Automatically retrying getting container proxy due to error for &lt;private&gt;: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=&lt;private&gt;} XPC connection interrupted for &lt;private&gt; And this error for xpc service: [0x130e074b0] failed to do a bootstrap look-up: xpc_error=[3: No such process] If I start the same cli process directly from XCode, then it works just fine.
3
0
236
May ’25
PKAddPaymentPassError
please bear with me, i am NOT a developer. we have third party developer creating a banking app that is throwing an error when trying to provision MasterCard for Apple Pay. MasterCard says they do not see the request come in at all. our developer says the issue is between mastercard and apple - and asked us to reach out to Apple. Information provided from our developer: “Error code 2 is 'system cancelled' from the PKAddPaymentPassError enum. Basically, there is an issue between Apple and Mastercard (using the encrypted card info from...” Response from Mastercard Connect: Upon further research with the examples you shared we are not seeing any attempt that reached to MC
0
1
98
May ’25
Push Notifications Failing - Xcode shows "Untitled" Certificates & "No App ID" for Push Console after Org Account Migration
Hi everyone, I recently migrated my individual Apple Developer account to an Organization account for my company "". My Team ID remained the same. I'm now facing persistent issues with code signing and push notifications for my iOS app (Bundle ID: com.).
 Current Problems:
 "Untitled" Certificates in Xcode: When I go to Xcode -> Settings -> Accounts -> [My Apple ID] -> Select "" Team -> "Manage Certificates...", a number of my newly created Apple Development and Apple Distribution certificates are listed древ "Untitled". Some older ones are "Revoked". (See attached screenshot if possible).
 "No App ID" for Push Notifications Console: In my app target's "Signing & Capabilities" tab, I've added the "Push Notifications" capability. However, when I click the info button to open the "Push Notifications Console", it states: "no app IDs: Register an App ID with the Push Notifications capability enabled to use the Push Notifications console." This is despite the fact that the Push Notifications capability IS enabled for my App ID com. in the Developer Portal, and I've configured an APNs Auth Key (.p8) for it.
 Push Notifications Not Received (from Backend): While I can successfully send a test push notification directly from the Firebase Console to my device's FCM token, notifications triggered by my backend (Firebase Cloud Functions writing to a Firestore collection, which then triggers another function to send via FCM) are not being delivered to iOS devices. (Android seems to be working more reliably now).
 Setup: Using an APNs Authentication Key (.p8) linked to my Organization Team ID in Firebase Cloud Messaging. Main App ID com. has "Push Notifications" capability enabled. Notification Service Extension com..ImageNotification also has its App ID and Provisioning Profile set up for the Organization team. Created new Development and Distribution certificates and Provisioning Profiles specifically for the Organization team. Using "Automatically manage signing" in Xcode with the Organization team selected for both the main app target and the extension target.
 Troubleshooting Done: Revoked old/problematic certificates and profiles. Recreated CSRs and new Development/Distribution certificates under the Organization team multiple times. Recreated Provisioning Profiles. Cleaned Derived Data in Xcode. Ensured Bundle Identifiers are consistent. Verified APNs Auth Key details (Key ID, Team ID) in Firebase.
 I suspect there's a fundamental issue with how Xcode is recognizing or linking the signing assets for my Organization team after the account type change, despite the Team ID being the same. The "Untitled" certificates are a major red flag.
 Has anyone encountered similar issues, particularly the "Untitled" certificates or the "No App ID" message for the Push Console, after an account migration or when working with Organization accounts? Any insights on how to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
 Thanks,
Benni
0
0
194
May ’25
BLE Performance Issue – Increased Latency When Running Scan Algorithm via iPad
I'm developing an application in Swift using Xcode on an iPad Pro. The app communicates over BLE with a custom hardware board. The board runs a scan algorithm in response to commands from the iPad application. When testing the scan algorithm on the board independently, it completes in approximately 35 ms. However, when triggered via BLE communication from the iPad, the same algorithm takes around 150 ms to complete (roughly equivalent to 3 BLE messages). Is this level of latency expected when using BLE on iOS, or is there a way to reduce it? I’d appreciate any guidance on improving the performance. Thank you!
1
0
150
May ’25
Critical Alerts and Notification Permissions
Back story: I'm developing an app that communicates with a personal medical device. We use critical alerts when we have hardware issues that could result in harm to the patient. The audio file is a 30 second file to make sure the patient is aware. If the app is open when they occur, we pop up a modal message in the app. When the user dismisses the notice, we call UNNotificationCenter::removeDeliveredNotifications(withIdentifiers:) to remove the critical alert and also to stop the audio file that is playing. This normally works fine. However we discovered that if the patient leaves critical alert enabled but disables notifications for our app, that we can still post the critical alert and it goes off. However when the user dismisses the message, the removeDeliveredNotifications call does not work. I did some debugging and if call getDeliveredNotifications with this permission combination, it return 0 (normally it would return 1). Does anyone know of another way to remove the critical alert in this situation? (or should I be submitting this as a bug?)
2
0
596
May ’25
Cannot get public keys for jwks verification
I am using the public url https://api.storekit-sandbox.itunes.apple.com/inApps/v1/notifications/jwsPublicKeys to get the jwks keys to verify the signed payload for store kit payments. I am checking Apple server notifications. const APPLE_JWKS_URL = "https://api.storekit-sandbox.itunes.apple.com/inApps/v1/notifications/jwsPublicKeys" // Apple JWK set (cached by jose) const appleJWKS = createRemoteJWKSet(new URL(APPLE_JWKS_URL)); const jwks = await appleJWKS(); logger.debug("Apple JWKS Keys: %O", jwks); // Log the keys if (!signedPayload) { // return res.status(400).json({ error: "Missing signedPayload" }); } // Step 1: Verify JWS (signature + payload) using Apple's JWKS const { payload, protectedHeader } = await jwtVerify( signedPayload, appleJWKS, { algorithms: ["ES256"], // Apple uses ES256 for signing } );
0
1
380
May ’25
Clarification on Use of exit(0) in iOS App for Fatal Error Recovery
I am reaching out to seek clarification on the usage of exit(0) within an iOS application under specific circumstances, as I have not been able to find concrete guidance on this in the App Store Review Guidelines Context of Our Application: We are developing a mobile game using Cocos2d-JS (Cocos2d-x JavaScript bindings). The game is built in C++ with JavaScript used for game logic, and it runs on both Android and iOS. Occasionally, due to an unrecoverable fatal JavaScript error (e.g., corrupted state or unexpected runtime crash), the game’s screen goes completely black. When this occurs, the rendering engine halts, user interaction becomes impossible, and the app enters a non-functional state. From this point, the only way to return to a working state is to manually terminate and relaunch the app. We are exploring a user-friendly solution where, upon detecting such a critical failure, we present a native UIAlertController to the user explaining the issue and informing them that the app needs to restart. Upon confirmation (i.e., tapping “OK”), we call exit(0) to gracefully close the app, so the user can relaunch it in a working state. Our Question: Is it acceptable to use exit(0) in this very limited and clearly explained context? The intention is to improve the user experience during unrecoverable fatal states that cannot be handled through standard UI or engine resets. I understand that the use of exit(0) is generally discouraged, but in our case: The user explicitly initiates the exit via a native prompt. The app is not quitting on its own or in response to a policy violation. We are not using exit(0) to bypass App Review or circumvent system behavior. There is no mention in the App Review Guidelines explicitly stating whether or not exit(0) is disallowed in such edge cases. Please confirm whether this approach aligns with Apple's policies, or suggest an alternative method for cleanly handling such irrecoverable errors on iOS? Looking forward to your guidance.
2
0
412
May ’25
購入情報をサーバーで管理する場合は、アプリからサーバーに購入情報を渡す際にレシート検証する必要があるのか
アプリ内課金を実装しようとしていますが、サーバサイドのセキュリティに関してについて質問です。 StoreKit2を使えばアプリとApp Store Connect間のレシート検証は不要だが、 購入情報をサーバーで管理する場合は アプリからサーバーに購入情報を渡す際にレシート検証する必要があると考えるがその認識であっているか教えていただきたいです。
0
0
127
May ’25
Are push-to-start tokens app wide or per type?
Confusion Based on the fact that the subscription is requested on a Activity type, I assumed that the push-to-start tokens would be different. But the push-to-start token for WidgetExtensionAttributes and WidgetExtensionAttributesOther were identical. This is misleading. The code below prints identical tokens even though the name of the token and their underlying schema are different. Code Sample func getTokens() { Task { if let data = Activity<func getTokens() { Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes>.pushToStartToken { print("exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("new:", ptsTokenString) } } } Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther>.pushToStartToken { print("other exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("other requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("other new:", ptsTokenString) } } } }>.pushToStartToken { print("exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("new:", ptsTokenString) } } } Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther>.pushToStartToken { print("other exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("other requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("other new:", ptsTokenString) } } } } Activity Types struct WidgetExtensionAttributesOther: ActivityAttributes { public struct ContentState: Codable, Hashable { var age: Int } var addresses: [String] } struct WidgetExtensionAttributes: ActivityAttributes { public struct ContentState: Codable, Hashable { var emoji: String } var name: String } Docs After much investigation I noticed the wording of the docs kind of hint that the push-to-start token is per ActivityKit as it says: An asynchronous sequence you use to observe changes to the token for starting a Live Activity with an ActivityKit push notification. But docs and the API don't align well. Questions Is it correct that the push-to-start token is per app? If so then is there a reason that that API designers decided to still have to pass a specific type and not just make a request without passing a type? Should I maybe file a radar? Is it correct to say push-to-start is per app, while update tokens are per instance. i.e. if I have two soccer matches, then unless the push-to-start token was refreshed by the OS, then both would use the same push-to-start token, however each match would have a unique update token?
1
0
372
May ’25
StoreKit2, IAP not instantly shared with Family
Hey folks! In one of our apps we're using the FamilyControls framework to manage the screentime for the child. The app requires the Guardian to activate a subscription on his/her device to enable the functionality for the Child on the child device. We're currently using StoreKit 2 to get notified when there is an active subscription. The issue we're seeing (and our users) is that an activated subscription isn't instantly propagated to the Family members, in this case the device belonging to the child. Is this a known bug, and are the possible any workarounds? Currently we have to ask our users to "Restore Purchase" or wait minutes/hours for the app to active, which isn't a viable solution. We want it to "just work" :) Sincerely, César Pinto Castillo Ambi Studio
3
0
139
May ’25
NWConnections in Network Extension Redirected to Proxy
We have a setup where the system uses proxy settings configured via a PAC file. We are investigating how NWConnection behaves inside a Network Extension (NETransparentProxyProvider) with a transparent proxy configuration based on this PAC file. Scenario: The browser makes a connection which the PAC file resolves as "DIRECT" (bypassing the proxy) Our Network Extension intercepts this traffic for analysis The extension creates a new connection using NWConnection to the original remote address. The issue: despite the PAC file’s "DIRECT" decision, NWConnection still respects the system proxy settings and routes the connection through the proxy. Our questions: Is it correct that NWConnection always uses the system proxy if configured ? Does setting preferNoProxies = true guarantee bypassing the system proxy? Additionally: Whitelisting IPs in the Network Extension to avoid interception is not a viable solution because IPs may correspond to multiple services, and the extension only sees IP addresses, not domains (e.g., we want to skip scanning meet.google.com traffic but still scan other Google services on the same IP range). Are there any recommended approaches or best practices to ensure that connections initiated from a Network Extension can truly bypass the proxy (for example, for specific IP ranges or domains)?
1
0
172
May ’25
Replacing Packet Filter (pf) with Content Filter for VPN Firewall Use Case
Hi, We're in the process of following Apple’s guidance on transitioning away from Packet Filter (pf) and migrating to a Network Extension-based solution that functions as a firewall. During this transition, we've encountered several limitations with the current Content Filter API and wanted to share our findings. Our VPN client relies on firewall functionality to enforce strict adherence to split tunneling rules defined via the routing table. This ensures that no traffic leaks outside the VPN tunnel, which is critical for our users for a variety of reasons. To enforce this, our product currently uses interface-scoped rules to block all non-VPN traffic outside the tunnel. Replicating this behavior with the Content Filter API (NEFilterDataProvider) appears to be infeasible today. The key limitation we've encountered is that the current Content Filter API does not expose information about the network interface associated with a flow. As a workaround, we considered using the flow’s local endpoint IP to infer the interface, but this data is not available until after returning a verdict to peek into the flow’s data—at which point the connection has already been established. This can result in connection metadata leaking outside the tunnel, which may contain sensitive information depending on the connection. What is the recommended approach for this use case? NEFilterPacketProvider? This may work, but it has a negative impact on network performance. Using a Packet Tunnel Provider and purely relying on enforceRoutes? Would this indeed ensure that no traffic can leak by targeting a specific interface or by using a second VPN extension? And more broadly—especially if no such approach is currently feasible with the existing APIs—we're interpreting TN3165 as a signal that pf should be considered deprecated and may not be available in the next major macOS release. Is that a reasonable interpretation?
5
0
292
May ’25
public API which allows to get information about APFS
Hello, I am working on a daemon which collects information about disk space usage on macOS. APFS has quite complex structure and there is a challenge to get detailed info. My application must provide disk usage by APFS containers. Are there any recommended way to get space usage by particular APFS volume? Are there any recommended way to get free space on particular APFS container? Are there any recommended way to enumerate APFS containers and volumes? I am using Disk Arbitration to get APFS info. However, I get restricted info about space usage because I get get disk usage for mounted volumes only. Are there any public API (daemon-safe) which allows to easily get disk space usage on macOS? Thank you in advance, Pavel
Replies
6
Boosts
0
Views
235
Activity
May ’25
SMAppService getting notified when status changes externally (from System Settings)
Say I want to sync a toggle in my app with SMAppService's .status property. If the status changes from my app I can track it. But if user toggles it from System Settings, I don't see a notification so then the UI in my app is out of date. The status property is not key value observable and there doesn't appear to be a SMAppServiceStatusDidChangeNotification ? I can re-read it every time my app will become active but feels kind of wrong to do it this way.
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
190
Activity
May ’25
TCP/IP Connection Reset --- request Timeout
send a request and it returns with timeout Integration Team are Using Fortigate as a firewall and NGINX for some reasons so we use VPN TO Access , requests always succeed but at once it failed with timeout in randomize request not specific one we are using URLSession as a network layer when I retry the same failed request again, it success the request cannot connect apigee Sec Team concern { app session hits the security gateway with lots of SYN step to try to initiate a new session and doesn’t wait for (SYN-ACK / ACK) steps to happen to make sure the connection initiated correctly and gateway consider it flooding attack }
Replies
4
Boosts
1
Views
140
Activity
May ’25
Inquiry regarding StoreKit Messages for Free Trial Conversion and Recurring Payment Consent in South Korea
Dear Apple Developer Support, Our iOS application offers subscriptions with a free trial period. We understand that in South Korea, due to local subscription regulations, users must explicitly provide consent for recurring payments before the subscription converts from a free trial to a paid period. We have the following questions regarding how StoreKit handles this scenario: When a free trial is about to convert to a paid subscription for a user in South Korea, does StoreKit send a StoreKit.Message (or SKStorefront.Message) to the application to obtain the required consent for recurring payments? If such a message is sent, would the Reason for this message be StoreKit.Message.Reason.priceIncreaseConsent, or would it be another specific reason related to initial recurring payment consent after a trial? If our application receives such a message and we choose to defer its display, what is the maximum recommended or permissible deferral period? Is it possible to save the data of a received StoreKit.Message and display it to the user at a later time, for instance, after the application has been closed and subsequently reopened? Are there any best practices or limitations regarding this? We need this information to ensure our application correctly handles these consent requirements in compliance with South Korean policies and provides a smooth user experience. Thank you for your guidance.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
147
Activity
May ’25
NFC HCE CardSession.isSupported crash
I am getting report of a crash occurring, while doing a NFC HCE CardSession. The swift code is mostly the same as the example from the CardSession docs: @objc func deviceSupportsNFC (_ call: CAPPluginCall) { call.keepAlive = true let supportsNFCCallbackId = call.callbackId! Task() { guard NFCReaderSession.readingAvailable, CardSession.isSupported, // <-- line 86 await CardSession.isEligible else { print(TAG + " HCE not allowed/available") var support = JSObject() support["supported"] = false; let callback = bridge?.savedCall(withID: supportsNFCCallbackId) call.resolve(); callback?.resolve(support); return; } print(TAG + " HCE allowed") var support = JSObject() support["supported"] = true; let callback = bridge?.savedCall(withID: supportsNFCCallbackId) call.resolve(); callback?.resolve(support); } } Calling it from my plugin, to verify if (HCE) NFC is supported: if(await deviceInfoService.isIos()) { if(iosSupportEnabled === false) { console.log("NfcHceService:iOS but disabled"); return; } this.requiresManualTrigger = true; DfsNfcHce.deviceSupportsNFC((supportObj) => { const support = supportObj?.supported ?? false; this.hceSupported = support; }); } else { this.hceSupported = true; } The crash report i get via Crashlytics is below. It's specifying the error occurs at line 86 (marked it in my code above) The error seems to be in the CoreNFC (NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported). # Crashlytics - Stack trace # Application: com.wodanbrothers.dyflexis # Platform: apple # Version: 2025.04.101356 (1744977392) # Issue: c3a293fbfa73c64f59f92c4b4cdfeb83 # Session: 5c64465c452c41e3abb1ba9f970b54c0_DNE_0_v2 # Date: Wed May 07 2025 07:56:11 GMT+0200 (Central European Summer Time) Fatal Exception: NSInvalidArgumentException 0 CoreFoundation 0x11a2ec __exceptionPreprocess 1 libobjc.A.dylib 0x31a7c objc_exception_throw 2 CoreFoundation 0x18467c +[NSObject(NSObject) _copyDescription] 3 CoreFoundation 0x31b84 ___forwarding___ 4 CoreFoundation 0x314f0 _CF_forwarding_prep_0 5 CoreNFC 0x2ac40 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:outError:] 6 CoreNFC 0x2b184 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:expiry:completion:] 7 CoreNFC 0x2f9d8 block_destroy_helper.5 8 Dyflexis 0x5c08 closure #1 in DfsNfcHcePlugin.deviceSupportsNFC(_:) + 86 (DfsNfcHcePlugin.swift:86) 9 Dyflexis 0x7f8d <deduplicated_symbol> 10 Dyflexis 0x7725 specialized thunk for @escaping @isolated(any) @callee_guaranteed @async () -> (@out A) (<compiler-generated>) 11 Dyflexis 0x77fd <deduplicated_symbol> 12 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x65241 completeTaskWithClosure(swift::AsyncContext*, swift::SwiftError ... Crashed: com.google.firebase.crashlytics.ios.exception 0 FirebaseCrashlytics 0x1b658 FIRCLSProcessRecordAllThreads + 172 1 FirebaseCrashlytics 0x1ba64 FIRCLSProcessRecordAllThreads + 1208 2 FirebaseCrashlytics 0x13adc FIRCLSHandler + 48 3 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xe9d4 __FIRCLSExceptionRecord_block_invoke + 92 4 libdispatch.dylib 0x1b584 _dispatch_client_callout + 16 5 libdispatch.dylib 0x11728 _dispatch_lane_barrier_sync_invoke_and_complete + 56 6 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xe260 FIRCLSExceptionRecord + 204 7 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xe4f8 FIRCLSExceptionRecordNSException + 452 8 FirebaseCrashlytics 0xdeb8 FIRCLSTerminateHandler() + 396 9 libc++abi.dylib 0x158b4 std::__terminate(void (*)()) + 16 10 libc++abi.dylib 0x18e1c __cxa_get_exception_ptr + 86 11 libc++abi.dylib 0x18dc4 __cxxabiv1::failed_throw(__cxxabiv1::__cxa_exception*) + 90 12 libobjc.A.dylib 0x31be4 objc_exception_throw + 448 13 CoreFoundation 0x18467c +[NSObject(NSObject) _copyDescription] + 362 14 CoreFoundation 0x31b84 ___forwarding___ + 1492 15 CoreFoundation 0x314f0 _CF_forwarding_prep_0 + 96 16 CoreNFC 0x2ac40 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:outError:] + 364 17 CoreNFC 0x2b184 -[NFCHardwareManager areFeaturesSupported:expiry:completion:] + 96 18 CoreNFC 0x2f9d8 block_destroy_helper.5 + 8028 19 Dyflexis 0x5c08 closure #1 in DfsNfcHcePlugin.deviceSupportsNFC(_:) + 86 (DfsNfcHcePlugin.swift:86) 20 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x5c134 swift::runJobInEstablishedExecutorContext(swift::Job*) + 292 21 libswift_Concurrency.dylib 0x5d5c8 swift_job_runImpl(swift::Job*, swift::SerialExecutorRef) + 156 22 libdispatch.dylib 0x13db0 _dispatch_root_queue_drain + 364 23 libdispatch.dylib 0x1454c _dispatch_worker_thread2 + 156 24 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x4624 _pthread_wqthread + 232 25 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x19f8 start_wqthread + 8 ...
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
237
Activity
May ’25
Persistent CloudKit Server-to-Server INTERNAL_ERROR (500) Despite Correct Key Parsing & Request Formatting for /users/current
Hello Devs, I'm encountering a persistent INTERNAL_ERROR (HTTP 500) when making Server-to-Server API calls to CloudKit, specifically when trying to hit the /users/current endpoint, even after meticulously verifying all client-side components. I'm hoping someone might have insight into what could cause this. Context: Goal: Authenticate to CloudKit from a Vercel Serverless Function (Node.js) to perform operations like record queries. Problem Endpoint: POST https://api.apple-cloudkit.com/database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Key Generation Method: Using the CloudKit Dashboard's "Tokens &amp; Keys" -&gt; "New Server-to-Server Key" flow, where I generate the private key using openssl ecparam -name prime256v1 -genkey -noout -out mykey.pem, then extract the public key using openssl ec -in mykey.pem -pubout, and paste the public key material (between BEGIN/END markers) into the dashboard. The private key was then converted to PKCS#8 format using openssl pkcs8 -topk8 -nocrypt -in mykey.pem -out mykey_pkcs8.pem. Current Setup Being Tested (in a Vercel Node.js function): CLOUDKIT_CONTAINER: iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball CLOUDKIT_KEY_ID: 9368dddf141ce9bc0da743b9f69bc3eda132b9bb3e62a4167e428d4f320b656e (This is the Key ID generated from the CloudKit Dashboard for the public key I provided). CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY (Environment Variable): Contains the base64 encoded string of the entire content of my PKCS#8 formatted private key file. Key Processing in Code: const p8Base64 = process.env.CLOUDKIT_P8_KEY; const privateKeyPEM = Buffer.from(p8Base64, 'base64').toString('utf8'); // This privateKeyPEM string starts with "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----" and ends with "-----END PRIVATE KEY-----" const privateKey = crypto.createPrivateKey({ key: privateKeyPEM, format: 'pem' }); // This line SUCCEEDS without DECODER errors in my Vercel function logs. Use code with caution. JavaScript Request Body for /users/current: "{}" Signing String (message = Date:BodyHash:Path): Date: Correct ISO8601 format (e.g., "2025-05-21T19:38:11.886Z") BodyHash: Correct SHA256 hash of "{}", then Base64 encoded (e.g., "RBNvo1WzZ4oRRq0W9+hknpT7T8If536DEMBg9hyq/4o=") Path: Exactly /database/1/iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball/production/public/users/current Headers: X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-KeyID: Set to the correct Key ID. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-ISO8601Date: Set to the date used in the signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Request-SignatureV1: Set to the generated signature. X-Apple-CloudKit-Environment: "production" Content-Type: "application/json" Observed Behavior &amp; Logs: The Node.js crypto.createPrivateKey call successfully parses the decoded PEM key in my Vercel function. The request is sent to CloudKit. CloudKit responds with HTTP 500 and the following JSON body (UUID varies per request): { "uuid": "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx", "serverErrorCode": "INTERNAL_ERROR" } Use code with caution. Json This happens consistently. Previously, with other key pairs or different P8 processing attempts, I was getting AUTHENTICATION_FAILED (401) or local DECODER errors. Now that the key parsing is successful on my end with this current key pair and setup, I'm hitting this INTERNAL_ERROR. Troubleshooting Done: Verified Key ID (9368dddf...) is correct and corresponds to the key generated via CloudKit Dashboard. Verified Container ID (iCloud.com.dannybaseball.Danny-Baseball) is correct. Successfully parsed the private key from the environment variable (after base64 decoding) within the Vercel function. Meticulously checked the signing string components (Date, BodyHash, Path) against Apple's documentation. Path format is /database/1////. Ensured all required headers are present with correct values. Local Node.js tests (bypassing Vercel but using the same key data and signing logic) also result in this INTERNAL_ERROR. Question: What could cause CloudKit to return an INTERNAL_ERROR (500) for a /users/current request when the client-side key parsing is successful and all request components (path, body hash for signature, date, headers) appear to conform exactly to the Server-to-Server Web Services Reference? Are there any known subtle issues with EC keys generated via openssl ecparam (and then converted to PKCS#8) that might lead to this, even if crypto.createPrivateKey parses them in Node.js? Could there be an issue with my specific Key ID or container that would manifest this way, requiring Apple intervention? Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. I can provide more detailed logs of the request components if needed. Thank you!
Replies
1
Boosts
1
Views
173
Activity
May ’25
LaunchAgent can't connect to CloudKit daemon
For this code: let status = try await container.accountStatus() Seeing this error: 2025-05-08 15:32:00.945731-0500 localhost myAgent[2661]: (myDaemon.debug.dylib) [com.myDaemon.cli:networking] Error Domain=CKErrorDomain Code=6 "Error connecting to CloudKit daemon. This could happen for many reasons, for example a daemon exit, a device reboot, a race with the connection inactivity monitor, invalid entitlements, and more. Check the logs around this time to investigate the cause of this error." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Error connecting to CloudKit daemon. This could happen for many reasons, for example a daemon exit, a device reboot, a race with the connection inactivity monitor, invalid entitlements, and more. Check the logs around this time to investigate the cause of this error., CKRetryAfter=5, CKErrorDescription=Error connecting to CloudKit daemon. This could happen for many reasons, for example a daemon exit, a device reboot, a race with the connection inactivity monitor, invalid entitlements, and more. Check the logs around this time to investigate the cause of this error., NSUnderlyingError=0x600001bfc270 {Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 UserInfo={NSDebugDescription= I initially started the this process as System Daemon to see what would happen (which obviously does not have CloudKit features). Then moved it back to /Library/LaunchAgents/ and can't get rid of that error. I see also following message from CloudKit daemon: Ignoring failed attempt to get container proxy for &lt;private&gt;: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=&lt;private&gt;} Automatically retrying getting container proxy due to error for &lt;private&gt;: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=4099 UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=&lt;private&gt;} XPC connection interrupted for &lt;private&gt; And this error for xpc service: [0x130e074b0] failed to do a bootstrap look-up: xpc_error=[3: No such process] If I start the same cli process directly from XCode, then it works just fine.
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
236
Activity
May ’25
Alarm when phone power off
Hi, I would like to asking , can I setup a. alarm to alert when phone if OFF power ? since we would like to design a timer with emergence alert. so I need a alert on even phone power is off , Thanks.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
130
Activity
May ’25
PKAddPaymentPassError
please bear with me, i am NOT a developer. we have third party developer creating a banking app that is throwing an error when trying to provision MasterCard for Apple Pay. MasterCard says they do not see the request come in at all. our developer says the issue is between mastercard and apple - and asked us to reach out to Apple. Information provided from our developer: “Error code 2 is 'system cancelled' from the PKAddPaymentPassError enum. Basically, there is an issue between Apple and Mastercard (using the encrypted card info from...” Response from Mastercard Connect: Upon further research with the examples you shared we are not seeing any attempt that reached to MC
Replies
0
Boosts
1
Views
98
Activity
May ’25
Push Notifications Failing - Xcode shows "Untitled" Certificates & "No App ID" for Push Console after Org Account Migration
Hi everyone, I recently migrated my individual Apple Developer account to an Organization account for my company "". My Team ID remained the same. I'm now facing persistent issues with code signing and push notifications for my iOS app (Bundle ID: com.).
 Current Problems:
 "Untitled" Certificates in Xcode: When I go to Xcode -> Settings -> Accounts -> [My Apple ID] -> Select "" Team -> "Manage Certificates...", a number of my newly created Apple Development and Apple Distribution certificates are listed древ "Untitled". Some older ones are "Revoked". (See attached screenshot if possible).
 "No App ID" for Push Notifications Console: In my app target's "Signing & Capabilities" tab, I've added the "Push Notifications" capability. However, when I click the info button to open the "Push Notifications Console", it states: "no app IDs: Register an App ID with the Push Notifications capability enabled to use the Push Notifications console." This is despite the fact that the Push Notifications capability IS enabled for my App ID com. in the Developer Portal, and I've configured an APNs Auth Key (.p8) for it.
 Push Notifications Not Received (from Backend): While I can successfully send a test push notification directly from the Firebase Console to my device's FCM token, notifications triggered by my backend (Firebase Cloud Functions writing to a Firestore collection, which then triggers another function to send via FCM) are not being delivered to iOS devices. (Android seems to be working more reliably now).
 Setup: Using an APNs Authentication Key (.p8) linked to my Organization Team ID in Firebase Cloud Messaging. Main App ID com. has "Push Notifications" capability enabled. Notification Service Extension com..ImageNotification also has its App ID and Provisioning Profile set up for the Organization team. Created new Development and Distribution certificates and Provisioning Profiles specifically for the Organization team. Using "Automatically manage signing" in Xcode with the Organization team selected for both the main app target and the extension target.
 Troubleshooting Done: Revoked old/problematic certificates and profiles. Recreated CSRs and new Development/Distribution certificates under the Organization team multiple times. Recreated Provisioning Profiles. Cleaned Derived Data in Xcode. Ensured Bundle Identifiers are consistent. Verified APNs Auth Key details (Key ID, Team ID) in Firebase.
 I suspect there's a fundamental issue with how Xcode is recognizing or linking the signing assets for my Organization team after the account type change, despite the Team ID being the same. The "Untitled" certificates are a major red flag.
 Has anyone encountered similar issues, particularly the "Untitled" certificates or the "No App ID" message for the Push Console, after an account migration or when working with Organization accounts? Any insights on how to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
 Thanks,
Benni
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
194
Activity
May ’25
BLE Performance Issue – Increased Latency When Running Scan Algorithm via iPad
I'm developing an application in Swift using Xcode on an iPad Pro. The app communicates over BLE with a custom hardware board. The board runs a scan algorithm in response to commands from the iPad application. When testing the scan algorithm on the board independently, it completes in approximately 35 ms. However, when triggered via BLE communication from the iPad, the same algorithm takes around 150 ms to complete (roughly equivalent to 3 BLE messages). Is this level of latency expected when using BLE on iOS, or is there a way to reduce it? I’d appreciate any guidance on improving the performance. Thank you!
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
150
Activity
May ’25
Critical Alerts and Notification Permissions
Back story: I'm developing an app that communicates with a personal medical device. We use critical alerts when we have hardware issues that could result in harm to the patient. The audio file is a 30 second file to make sure the patient is aware. If the app is open when they occur, we pop up a modal message in the app. When the user dismisses the notice, we call UNNotificationCenter::removeDeliveredNotifications(withIdentifiers:) to remove the critical alert and also to stop the audio file that is playing. This normally works fine. However we discovered that if the patient leaves critical alert enabled but disables notifications for our app, that we can still post the critical alert and it goes off. However when the user dismisses the message, the removeDeliveredNotifications call does not work. I did some debugging and if call getDeliveredNotifications with this permission combination, it return 0 (normally it would return 1). Does anyone know of another way to remove the critical alert in this situation? (or should I be submitting this as a bug?)
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
596
Activity
May ’25
Cannot get public keys for jwks verification
I am using the public url https://api.storekit-sandbox.itunes.apple.com/inApps/v1/notifications/jwsPublicKeys to get the jwks keys to verify the signed payload for store kit payments. I am checking Apple server notifications. const APPLE_JWKS_URL = "https://api.storekit-sandbox.itunes.apple.com/inApps/v1/notifications/jwsPublicKeys" // Apple JWK set (cached by jose) const appleJWKS = createRemoteJWKSet(new URL(APPLE_JWKS_URL)); const jwks = await appleJWKS(); logger.debug("Apple JWKS Keys: %O", jwks); // Log the keys if (!signedPayload) { // return res.status(400).json({ error: "Missing signedPayload" }); } // Step 1: Verify JWS (signature + payload) using Apple's JWKS const { payload, protectedHeader } = await jwtVerify( signedPayload, appleJWKS, { algorithms: ["ES256"], // Apple uses ES256 for signing } );
Replies
0
Boosts
1
Views
380
Activity
May ’25
Clarification on Use of exit(0) in iOS App for Fatal Error Recovery
I am reaching out to seek clarification on the usage of exit(0) within an iOS application under specific circumstances, as I have not been able to find concrete guidance on this in the App Store Review Guidelines Context of Our Application: We are developing a mobile game using Cocos2d-JS (Cocos2d-x JavaScript bindings). The game is built in C++ with JavaScript used for game logic, and it runs on both Android and iOS. Occasionally, due to an unrecoverable fatal JavaScript error (e.g., corrupted state or unexpected runtime crash), the game’s screen goes completely black. When this occurs, the rendering engine halts, user interaction becomes impossible, and the app enters a non-functional state. From this point, the only way to return to a working state is to manually terminate and relaunch the app. We are exploring a user-friendly solution where, upon detecting such a critical failure, we present a native UIAlertController to the user explaining the issue and informing them that the app needs to restart. Upon confirmation (i.e., tapping “OK”), we call exit(0) to gracefully close the app, so the user can relaunch it in a working state. Our Question: Is it acceptable to use exit(0) in this very limited and clearly explained context? The intention is to improve the user experience during unrecoverable fatal states that cannot be handled through standard UI or engine resets. I understand that the use of exit(0) is generally discouraged, but in our case: The user explicitly initiates the exit via a native prompt. The app is not quitting on its own or in response to a policy violation. We are not using exit(0) to bypass App Review or circumvent system behavior. There is no mention in the App Review Guidelines explicitly stating whether or not exit(0) is disallowed in such edge cases. Please confirm whether this approach aligns with Apple's policies, or suggest an alternative method for cleanly handling such irrecoverable errors on iOS? Looking forward to your guidance.
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
412
Activity
May ’25
購入情報をサーバーで管理する場合は、アプリからサーバーに購入情報を渡す際にレシート検証する必要があるのか
アプリ内課金を実装しようとしていますが、サーバサイドのセキュリティに関してについて質問です。 StoreKit2を使えばアプリとApp Store Connect間のレシート検証は不要だが、 購入情報をサーバーで管理する場合は アプリからサーバーに購入情報を渡す際にレシート検証する必要があると考えるがその認識であっているか教えていただきたいです。
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
127
Activity
May ’25
Are push-to-start tokens app wide or per type?
Confusion Based on the fact that the subscription is requested on a Activity type, I assumed that the push-to-start tokens would be different. But the push-to-start token for WidgetExtensionAttributes and WidgetExtensionAttributesOther were identical. This is misleading. The code below prints identical tokens even though the name of the token and their underlying schema are different. Code Sample func getTokens() { Task { if let data = Activity<func getTokens() { Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes>.pushToStartToken { print("exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("new:", ptsTokenString) } } } Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther>.pushToStartToken { print("other exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("other requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("other new:", ptsTokenString) } } } }>.pushToStartToken { print("exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributes> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("new:", ptsTokenString) } } } Task { if let data = Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther>.pushToStartToken { print("other exists:", data.hexadecimalString) } else { print("other requesting pushToStartToken") for await ptsToken in Activity<WidgetExtensionAttributesOther> .pushToStartTokenUpdates { let ptsTokenString = ptsToken.hexadecimalString print("other new:", ptsTokenString) } } } } Activity Types struct WidgetExtensionAttributesOther: ActivityAttributes { public struct ContentState: Codable, Hashable { var age: Int } var addresses: [String] } struct WidgetExtensionAttributes: ActivityAttributes { public struct ContentState: Codable, Hashable { var emoji: String } var name: String } Docs After much investigation I noticed the wording of the docs kind of hint that the push-to-start token is per ActivityKit as it says: An asynchronous sequence you use to observe changes to the token for starting a Live Activity with an ActivityKit push notification. But docs and the API don't align well. Questions Is it correct that the push-to-start token is per app? If so then is there a reason that that API designers decided to still have to pass a specific type and not just make a request without passing a type? Should I maybe file a radar? Is it correct to say push-to-start is per app, while update tokens are per instance. i.e. if I have two soccer matches, then unless the push-to-start token was refreshed by the OS, then both would use the same push-to-start token, however each match would have a unique update token?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
372
Activity
May ’25
StoreKit2, IAP not instantly shared with Family
Hey folks! In one of our apps we're using the FamilyControls framework to manage the screentime for the child. The app requires the Guardian to activate a subscription on his/her device to enable the functionality for the Child on the child device. We're currently using StoreKit 2 to get notified when there is an active subscription. The issue we're seeing (and our users) is that an activated subscription isn't instantly propagated to the Family members, in this case the device belonging to the child. Is this a known bug, and are the possible any workarounds? Currently we have to ask our users to "Restore Purchase" or wait minutes/hours for the app to active, which isn't a viable solution. We want it to "just work" :) Sincerely, César Pinto Castillo Ambi Studio
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
139
Activity
May ’25
NWConnections in Network Extension Redirected to Proxy
We have a setup where the system uses proxy settings configured via a PAC file. We are investigating how NWConnection behaves inside a Network Extension (NETransparentProxyProvider) with a transparent proxy configuration based on this PAC file. Scenario: The browser makes a connection which the PAC file resolves as "DIRECT" (bypassing the proxy) Our Network Extension intercepts this traffic for analysis The extension creates a new connection using NWConnection to the original remote address. The issue: despite the PAC file’s "DIRECT" decision, NWConnection still respects the system proxy settings and routes the connection through the proxy. Our questions: Is it correct that NWConnection always uses the system proxy if configured ? Does setting preferNoProxies = true guarantee bypassing the system proxy? Additionally: Whitelisting IPs in the Network Extension to avoid interception is not a viable solution because IPs may correspond to multiple services, and the extension only sees IP addresses, not domains (e.g., we want to skip scanning meet.google.com traffic but still scan other Google services on the same IP range). Are there any recommended approaches or best practices to ensure that connections initiated from a Network Extension can truly bypass the proxy (for example, for specific IP ranges or domains)?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
172
Activity
May ’25
how to set both protocols and `URLRequest` to `NSURLSessionWebSocketTask`
Hi there. How can I do for the title? URLRequest seems not to have property for protocols. NSURLSessionWebSocketTask seems to have either URLRequest or protocols, but have neither of them. What I want to do is setting both protocols and headers when using WebSocket. Should I use Network.framework instead?
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
172
Activity
May ’25
Replacing Packet Filter (pf) with Content Filter for VPN Firewall Use Case
Hi, We're in the process of following Apple’s guidance on transitioning away from Packet Filter (pf) and migrating to a Network Extension-based solution that functions as a firewall. During this transition, we've encountered several limitations with the current Content Filter API and wanted to share our findings. Our VPN client relies on firewall functionality to enforce strict adherence to split tunneling rules defined via the routing table. This ensures that no traffic leaks outside the VPN tunnel, which is critical for our users for a variety of reasons. To enforce this, our product currently uses interface-scoped rules to block all non-VPN traffic outside the tunnel. Replicating this behavior with the Content Filter API (NEFilterDataProvider) appears to be infeasible today. The key limitation we've encountered is that the current Content Filter API does not expose information about the network interface associated with a flow. As a workaround, we considered using the flow’s local endpoint IP to infer the interface, but this data is not available until after returning a verdict to peek into the flow’s data—at which point the connection has already been established. This can result in connection metadata leaking outside the tunnel, which may contain sensitive information depending on the connection. What is the recommended approach for this use case? NEFilterPacketProvider? This may work, but it has a negative impact on network performance. Using a Packet Tunnel Provider and purely relying on enforceRoutes? Would this indeed ensure that no traffic can leak by targeting a specific interface or by using a second VPN extension? And more broadly—especially if no such approach is currently feasible with the existing APIs—we're interpreting TN3165 as a signal that pf should be considered deprecated and may not be available in the next major macOS release. Is that a reasonable interpretation?
Replies
5
Boosts
0
Views
292
Activity
May ’25