I've submitted my app four times, each time waiting a few hours for something to happen, then reducing the file size of my *.dmg and trying again. The first two seemed to have completed after 36 hours, but I no longer have that specific signed binary (and its a much smaller binary now anyway). The latest two are still "In Progress" and its almost been 48 hours. I know my process isn't wrong, and my app isn't somehow incorrectly built or being denied because two were accepted. The outage page shows green for the notary tool (https://developer.apple.com/system-status/) so I'm not sure what the hold up is.

Hi, We've created a new version of our macOS version of our app, but when I now try to upload the generated .pkg to App Store Connect via Xcode or Transporter we get this error message: ITMS-90286: Invalid code signing entitlements - Your application bundle’s signature contains code signing entitlements that aren’t supported on macOS. Specifically, the “AppIDPrefix.my.bundle.name” value for the com.apple.application-identifier key in “my.bundlename.pkg/Payload/appname.app/Contents/MacOS/appname” isn’t supported. This value should be a string that starts with your Team ID, followed by a dot (“.”), followed by the bundle ID. Setting the code signing to automatic or does not make a difference. Our app has a different App ID Prefix as our Team ID and when I try to upload the app to App Store Connect I get this error message, does anyone know how we can fix this issue? We used to be able to upload the apps without issues.

In my application I validate the authenticity of my own binaries by checking that the Team Identifier in the code signature matches a predefined value. Currently I do not perform a full signature validation that verifies the certificate chain up to Apple’s root CA. When attempting to do this using SecStaticCodeCheckValidityWithErrors (or validateWithRequirement), the operation sometimes takes several minutes. During that time the calling thread appears blocked, and the system logs show: trustd: [com.apple.securityd:SecError] Malformed anchor records, not an array Because of this delay, I decided to rely only on the Team Identifier. My question is: Can it be assumed that if a Mach-O binary contains a Team Identifier in its code signature, then it must have been signed with a valid Apple Developer certificate? Or are there cases where a binary could contain a Team ID but still not be signed by Apple’s trust chain? Thanks for the help !

My notarization submission been "In Progress" status for over 30 minutes now. I thought this process should be much faster.

Since 2026-03-17 09:06 UTC, all notarization submissions for one of our teams are stuck in "In Progress" indefinitely. Submission logs return "not yet available", indicating Apple's backend has not started processing. Sample submission IDs: 789d40c4-ff83-469f-9b9b-2ac93183125e 2d4685ed-56ac-49db-8e38-63f0b15650c1 5dc3f242-0add-4725-8386-bb32f8383240 18+ submissions affected. Hundreds of successful notarizations before this date with no issues. Please advise or check backend queue status.

Code signing uses various different identifier types, and I’ve seen a lot of folks confused as to which is which. This post is my attempt to clear up that confusion. If you have questions or comments, put them in a new thread, using the same topic area and tags as this post. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" Code Signing Identifiers Explained An identifier is a short string that uniquely identifies a resource. Apple’s code-signing infrastructure uses identifiers for various different resource types. These identifiers typically use one of a small selection of formats, so it’s not always clear what type of identifier you’re looking at. This post lists the common identifiers used by code signing, shows the expected format, and gives references to further reading. Unless otherwise noted, any information about iOS applies to iOS, iPadOS, tvOS, visionOS, and watchOS. Formats The code-signing identifiers discussed here a number of different formats: 10-character This is composed of 10 ASCII characters. For example, Team IDs use this format, as illustrated by the Team ID of one of Apple’s test teams: Z7P62XVNWC. Reverse-DNS This is composed of labels separated by a dot. For example, bundle IDs use this format, as illustrated by the bundle ID of the test app associated with this post: com.example.tn3NNNapp. UUID This is a standard universally unique identifier. For example, the App Store Connect API key associated with this post has a issuer UUID of c055ca8c-e5a8-4836-b61d-aa5794eeb3f4. Email or phone See the Apple Account section below for more on this. Decimal number This is a simple decimal number. For example, the Apple ID for Apple Configurator is 1037126344. The Domain Name System has strict rules about domain names, in terms of overall length, label length, text encoding, and case sensitivity. The reverse-DNS identifiers used by code signing may or may not have similar limits. When in doubt, consult the documentation for the specific identifier type. Reverse-DNS names are just a convenient way to format a string. You don’t have to control the corresponding DNS name. You can, for example, use com.<SomeCompany>.my-app as your bundle ID regardless of whether you control the <SomeCompany>.com domain name. To securely associate your app with a domain, use associated domains. For more on that, see Supporting associated domains. IMPORTANT Don’t use com.apple. in your reverse-DNS identifiers. That can yield unexpected results. Identifiers The following table summarises the identifiers covered below: Name | Format | Example | Notes ---- | ------ | ------- | ----- Team ID | 10-character | `Z7P62XVNWC` | Identifies a developer team User ID | 10-character | `UT376R4K29` | Identifies a developer Team Member ID | 10-character | `EW7W773AA7` | Identifies a developer in a team Bundle ID | reverse-DNS | `com.example.tn3NNNapp` | Identifies an app App ID prefix | 10-character | `Z7P62XVNWC` | Part of an App ID | | `VYRRC68ZE6` | App ID | mixed | `Z7P62XVNWC.com.example.tn3NNNNapp` | Connects an app and its provisioning profile | | `VYRRC68ZE6.com.example.tn3NNNNappB` | Code-signing identifier | reverse-DNS | `com.example.tn3NNNapp` | Identifies code to macOS | | `tn3NNNtool` | App group ID | reverse DNS | `group.tn3NNNapp.shared` | Identifies an app group | reverse DNS | `Z7P62XVNWC.tn3NNNapp.shared` | Identifies an macOS-style app group Managed capability request ID | 10-character | `M79GVA97FK` | Identifies a request for a managed capability App Store Connect API key ID | 10-character | `T9GPZ92M7K` | Identifies a key used for App Store Connect API authentication App Store Connect API issuer | UUID | `c055ca8c-e5a8-4836-b61d-aa5794eeb3f4` | Identifies a key issuer in the App Store Connect API Apple Account | email or phone | `user@example.com` | Identifies a user to the Developer website and App Store Connect Apple ID | decimal number | 1037126344 | Identifies an app in App Store Connect As you can see, there’s no clear way to distinguish a Team ID, User ID, Team Member ID, and an App ID prefix. You have to determine that based on the context. In contrast, you choose your own bundle ID and app group ID values, so choose values that make it easier to keep things straight. Team ID When you set up a team on the Developer website, it generates a unique Team ID for that team. This uses the 10-character format. For example, Z7P62XVNWC is the Team ID for an Apple test team. When the Developer website issues a certificate to a team, or a user within a team, it sets the Subject Name > Organisational Unit field to the Team ID. When the Developer website issues a certificate to a team, as opposed to a user in that team, it embeds the Team ID in the Subject > Common Name field. For example, a Developer ID Application certificate for the Team ID Z7P62XVNWC has the name Developer ID Application: <TeamName> (Z7P62XVNWC). User ID When you first sign in to the Developer website, it generates a unique User ID for your Apple Account. This User ID uses the 10-character format. For example, UT376R4K29 is the User ID for an Apple test user. When the Developer website issues a certificate to a user, it sets the Subject Name > User ID field to that user’s User ID. It uses the same value for that user in all teams. Team Member ID When you join a team on the Developer website, it generates a unique Team Member ID to track your association with that team. This uses the 10-character format. For example, EW7W773AA7 is the Team Member ID for User ID UT376R4K29 in Team ID Z7P62XVNWC. When the Developer website issues a certificate to a user on a team, it embeds the Team Member ID in the Subject > Common Name field. For example, an Apple Development certificate for User ID UT376R4K29 on Team ID Z7P62XVNWC has the name Apple Development: <UserName> (EW7W773AA7). IMPORTANT This naming system is a common source of confusion. Developers see this ID and wonder why it doesn’t match their Team ID. The advantage of this naming scheme is that each certificate gets a unique name even if the team has multiple members with the same name. The John Smiths of this world appreciate this very much. Bundle ID A bundle ID is a reverse-DNS identifier that identifies a single app throughout Apple’s ecosystem. For example, the test app associated with this post has a bundle ID of com.example.tn3NNNapp. If two apps have the same bundle ID, they are considered to be the same app. Bundle IDs have strict limits on their format. For the details, see CFBundleIdentifier. If your macOS code consumes bundle IDs — for example, you’re creating a security product that checks the identity of code — be warned that not all bundle IDs conform to the documented format. And non-bundled code, like a command-line tool or dynamic library, typically doesn’t have a bundle ID. Moreover, malicious code might use arbitrary bytes as the bundle ID, bytes that don’t parse as either ASCII or UTF-8. WARNING On macOS, don’t assume that a bundle ID follows the documented format, is UTF-8, or is even text at all. Do not assume that a bundle ID that starts with com.apple. represents Apple code. A better way to identify code on macOS is with its designated requirement, as explained in TN3127 Inside Code Signing: Requirements. On iOS this isn’t a problem because the Developer website checks the bundle ID format when you register your App ID. App ID prefix An App ID prefix forms part of an App ID (see below). It’s a 10-character identifier that’s either: The Team ID of the app’s team A unique App ID prefix Note Historically a unique App ID prefix was called a Bundle Seed ID. A unique App ID prefix is a 10-character identifier generated by Apple and allocated to your team, different from your Team ID. For example, Team ID Z7P62XVNWC has been allocated the unique App ID prefix of VYRRC68ZE6. Unique App ID prefixes are effectively deprecated: You can’t create a new App ID prefix. So, unless your team is very old, you don’t have to worry about unique App ID prefixes at all. If a unique App ID prefix is available to your team, it’s possible to create a new App ID with that prefix. But doing so prevents that app from sharing state with other apps from your team. Unique app ID prefixes are not supported on macOS. If your app uses a unique App ID prefix, you can request that it be migrated to use your Team ID by contacting Apple > Developer > Contact Us. If you app has embedded app extensions that also use your unique App ID prefix, include all those App IDs in your migration request. WARNING Before migrating from a unique App ID prefix, read App ID Prefix Change and Keychain Access. App ID An App ID ties your app to its provisioning profile. Specifically: You allocate an App ID on the Developer website. You sign your app with an entitlement that claims your App ID. When you launch the app, the system looks for a profile that authorises that claim. App IDs are critical on iOS. On macOS, App IDs are only necessary when your app claims a restricted entitlement. See TN3125 Inside Code Signing: Provisioning Profiles for more about this. App IDs have the format <Prefix>.<BundleOrWildcard>, where: <Prefix> is the App ID prefix, discussed above. <BundleOrWildcard> is either a bundle ID, for an explicit App ID, or a wildcard, for a wildcard App ID. The wildcard follows bundle ID conventions except that it must end with a star (*). For example: Z7P62XVNWC.com.example.tn3NNNNapp is an explicit App ID for Team ID Z7P62XVNWC. Z7P62XVNWC.com.example.* is a wildcard App ID for Team ID Z7P62XVNWC. VYRRC68ZE6.com.example.tn3NNNNappB is an explicit App ID with the unique App ID prefix of VYRRC68ZE6. Provisioning profiles created for an explicit App ID authorise the claim of just that App ID. Provisioning profiles created for a wildcard App ID authorise the claim of any App IDs whose bundle ID matches the wildcard, where the star (*) matches zero or more arbitrary characters. Wildcard App IDs are helpful for quick tests. Most production apps claim an explicit App ID, because various features rely on that. For example, in-app purchase requires an explicit App ID. Code-signing identifier A code-signing identifier is a string chosen by the code’s signer to uniquely identify their code. IMPORTANT Don’t confuse this with a code-signing identity, which is a digital identity used for code signing. For more about code-signing identities, see TN3161 Inside Code Signing: Certificates. Code-signing identifiers exist on iOS but they don’t do anything useful. On iOS, all third-party code must be bundled, and the system ensures that the code’s code-signing identifier matches its bundle ID. On macOS, code-signing identifiers play an important role in code-signing requirements. For more on that topic, see TN3127 Inside Code Signing: Requirements. When signing code, see Creating distribution-signed code for macOS for advice on how to select a code-signing identifier. If your macOS code consumes code-signing identifiers — for example, you’re creating a security product that checks the identity of code — be warned that these identifiers look like bundle IDs but they are not the same as bundle IDs. While bundled code typically uses the bundled ID as the code-signing identifier, macOS doesn’t enforce that convention. And non-bundled code, like a command-line tool or dynamic library, often uses the file name as the code-signing identifier. Moreover, malicious code might use arbitrary bytes as the code-signing identifier, bytes that don’t parse as either ASCII or UTF-8. WARNING On macOS, don’t assume that a code-signing identifier is a well-formed bundle ID, UTF-8, or even text at all. Don’t assume that a code-signing identifier that starts with com.apple. represents Apple code. A better way to identify code on macOS is with its designated requirement, as explained in TN3127 Inside Code Signing: Requirements. App Group ID An app group ID identifies an app group, that is, a mechanism to share state between multiple apps from the same team. For more about app groups, see App Groups Entitlement and App Groups: macOS vs iOS: Working Towards Harmony. App group IDs use two different forms of reverse-DNS identifiers: iOS-style This has the format group.<GroupName>, for example, group.tn3NNNapp.shared. macOS-style This has the format <TeamID>.<GroupName>, for example, Z7P62XVNWC.tn3NNNapp.shared. The first form originated on iOS but is now supported on macOS as well. The second form is only supported on macOS. iOS-style app group IDs must be registered with the Developer website. That ensures that the ID is unique and that the <GroupName> follows bundle ID rules. macOS-style app group IDs are less constrained. When choosing such a macOS-style app group ID, follow bundle ID rules for the group name. If your macOS code consumes app group IDs, be warned that not all macOS-style app group IDs follow bundle ID format. Indeed, malicious code might use arbitrary bytes as the app group ID, bytes that don’t parse as either ASCII or UTF-8. WARNING Don’t assume that a macOS-style app group ID follows bundle ID rules, is UTF-8, or is even text at all. Don’t assume that a macOS-style app group ID where the group name starts with com.apple. represents Apple in any way. Some developers use app group IDs of the form <TeamID>.group.<GroupName>. There’s nothing special about this format. It’s just a macOS-style app group ID where the first label in the group name just happens to be group Starting in Feb 2025, iOS-style app group IDs are fully supported on macOS. If you’re writing new code that uses app groups, use an iOS-style app group ID. This allows sharing between different product types, for example, between a native macOS app and an iOS app running on the Mac. Managed Capability Request ID Managed capabilities must be assigned to your account by Apple before you can use them. You apply for these using the Capability Requests tab on the Developer website. For more details, see New Capabilities Request Tab in Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles. When you make such a request, the Developer website assigns it a request ID, using the 10-character format. For example, M79GVA97FK is the request ID for an Apple test request. These request IDs are purely administrative; they have no build-time or run-time impact. App Store Connect API Keys The App Store Connect API authenticates requests using API keys. For the details, see Creating API Keys for App Store Connect API. Each API key has an associated issuer and key ID. The issuer is a UUID, for example, c055ca8c-e5a8-4836-b61d-aa5794eeb3f4. The key ID uses the 10-character format, for example, T9GPZ92M7K. These identifiers have no run-time impact, but they might be relevant when you’re building your app. For example: If your continuous integration (CI) uses the App Store Connect API, it will need an API key and its associated identifiers. If you notarise a Mac product, you might choose to authenticate using an App Store Connect API key and its associated identifiers. For an example of how to do that with notarytool, see TN3147 Migrating to the latest notarization tool. Apple Account An Apple Account is the personal account you use to access Apple services, including the Developer website and App Store Connect. Historically this was an email address, but nowadays you can also use a phone number. For more about Apple Accounts, see the Apple Account website. Your Apple Account was previously know as your Apple ID, which was confusingly similar to the next identifier. Apple ID In App Store Connect, an Apple ID refers to a decimal number that identifies your app. For example, the Apple ID for Apple Configurator is 1037126344. To see this in App Store Connect, navigate to the app record, select App Information on the left, and look for the Apple ID field. It’s a decimal number, usually around 10 digits long. You can also find this embedded in the App Store URL for the app. For example, the Apple Store URL for Apple Configurator is https://apps.apple.com/us/app/apple-configurator-2/id1037126344, which ends with its Apple ID. Note In some very obscure cases you might see this referred to as an Adam ID. Your app’s Apple ID is not used at runtime, but you may need to know it to accomplish administrative tasks. For example, most managed capability submission forms ask for your app’s Apple ID. Revision History 2026-03-05 Added the Apple Account and Apple ID sections. 2026-02-25 Added the Managed Capability Request ID and App Store Connect API Keys sections. Added UUID to the list of format. 2026-02-17 Corrected a minor formatting problem. 2026-01-06 First posted.

I requested the Family Controls (distribution) capability but am not sure if I did it correct. I applied, answered the questions why i needed it and submitted. Its been about 2 weeks since applying. In the app configurations, it on apple dev site, it shows in the request history that I submitted it on March 17, but I can click the request (+) button and request it again. Just want to make sure I didn't mess anything up--it seems like they would prevent me from sendin another request if I had already requested it. It hasn't taken them this long to get back to me in the past which is why I am confused. If anyone knows how to speed up the process, please let me know! Thanks.

The notary service requires that all Mach-O images be linked against the macOS 10.9 SDK or later. This isn’t an arbitrary limitation. The hardened runtime, another notarisation requirement, relies on code signing features that were introduced along with macOS 10.9 and it uses the SDK version to check for their presence. Specifically, it checks the SDK version using the sdk field in the LC_BUILD_VERSION Mach-O load command (or the older LC_VERSION_MIN_MACOSX command). There are three common symptoms of this problem: When notarising your product, the notary service rejects a Mach-O image with the error The binary uses an SDK older than the 10.9 SDK. When loading a dynamic library, the system fails with the error mapped file has no cdhash, completely unsigned?. When displaying the code signature of a library, codesign prints this warning: % codesign -d vvv /path/to/your.dylib … Library validation warning=OS X SDK version before 10.9 does not support Library Validation … If you see any of these errors, read on… The best way to avoid this problem is to rebuild your code with modern tools. However, in some cases that’s not possible. Imagine if your app relies on the closed source libDodo.dylib library. That library’s vendor went out of business 10 years ago, and so the library hasn’t been updated since then. Indeed, the library was linked against the macOS 10.6 SDK. What can you do? The first thing to do is come up with a medium-term plan for breaking your dependency on libDodo.dylib. Relying on an unmaintained library is not something that’s sustainable in the long term. The history of the Mac is one of architecture transitions — 68K to PowerPC to Intel, 32- to 64-bit, and so on — and this unmaintained library will make it much harder to deal with the next transition. IMPORTANT I wrote the above prior to the announcement of the latest Apple architecture transition, Apple silicon. When you update your product to a universal binary, you might as well fix this problem on the Intel side as well. Do not delay that any further: While Apple silicon Macs are currently able to run Intel code using Rosetta 2, that’s not something you want to rely on in the long term. Heed this advice from About the Rosetta Translation Environment: Rosetta is meant to ease the transition to Apple silicon, giving you time to create a universal binary for your app. It is not a substitute for creating a native version of your app. But what about the short term? Historically I wasn’t able to offer any help on that front, but this has changed recently. Xcode 11 ships with a command-line tool, vtool, that can change the LC_BUILD_VERSION and LC_VERSION_MIN_MACOSX commands in a Mach-O. You can use this to change the sdk field of these commands, and thus make your Mach-O image ‘compatible’ with notarisation and the hardened runtime. Before doing this, consider these caveats: Any given Mach-O image has only a limited amount of space for load commands. When you use vtool to set or modify the SDK version, the Mach-O could run out of load command space. The tool will fail cleanly in this case but, if it that happens, this technique simply won’t work. Changing a Mach-O image’s load commands will break the seal on its code signature. If the image is signed, remove the signature before doing that. To do this run codesign with the --remove-signature argument. You must then re-sign the library as part of your normal development and distribution process. Remember that a Mach-O image might contain multiple architectures. All of the tools discussed here have an option to work with a specific architecture (usually -arch or --architecture). Keep in mind, however, that macOS 10.7 and later do not run on 32-bit Macs, so if your deployment target is 10.7 or later then it’s safe to drop any 32-bit code. If you’re dealing with a Mach-O image that includes 32-bit Intel code, or indeed PowerPC code, make your life simpler by removing it from the image. Use lipo for this; see its man page for details. It’s possible that changing a Mach-O image’s SDK version could break something. Indeed, many system components use the main executable’s SDK version as part of their backwards compatibility story. If you change a main executable’s SDK version, you might run into hard-to-debug compatibility problems. Test such a change extensively. It’s also possible, but much less likely, that changing the SDK version of a non-main executable Mach-O image might break something. Again, this is something you should test extensively. This list of caveats should make it clear that this is a technique of last resort. I strongly recommend that you build your code with modern tools, and work with your vendors to ensure that they do the same. Only use this technique as part of a short-term compatibility measure while you implement a proper solution in the medium term. For more details on vtool, read its man page. Also familiarise yourself with otool, and specifically the -l option which dumps a Mach-O image’s load commands. Read its man page for details. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" Revision history: 2025-04-03 — Added a discussion of common symptoms. Made other minor editorial changes. 2022-05-09 — Updated with a note about Apple silicon. 2020-09-11 — First posted.

I've submitted my app, signed with a new Developer Id Certificate for a distribution outside of the App Store, 88 hours ago. xcrun notarytool history ... Shows the submission as "In Progress". xcrun notarytool log ... Tells me "Submission log is not yet available or submissionId does not exist". I don't know if that's expected for an "In Progress" submission. As far as I can tell the signing worked without problems. I'm using the Tauri toolchain, which under its hood is using notarytool. How long can I expect this to take? If there is a problem with my submission does the status just stay on "In Progress" or do I get an error? Thanks

I have been notarizing the same program for 3 years now and it's usually completed in minutes. I have not changed anything on my end, is there a reason it's taking 24+ hours all of a sudden? I have seen the posts regarding this issue for new applications where it has to "learn", but I have been notarizing the same apps for 3 years now.

base" : 6481543168, "size" : 5134811136, "uuid" : "7bc5af5f-1e86-3b36-9036-16025c72cb70" }, "vmSummary" : "ReadOnly portion of Libraries: Total=1.0G resident=0K(0%) swapped_out_or_unallocated=1.0G(100%)\nWritable regions: Total=28.8M written=369K(1%) resident=369K(1%) swapped_out=0K(0%) unallocated=28.5M(99%)\n\n VIRTUAL REGION \nREGION TYPE SIZE COUNT (non-coalesced) \n=========== ======= ======= \nActivity Tracing 256K 1 \nAttributeGraph Data 1024K 1 \nCoreAnimation 48K 3 \nDispatch continuations 6144K 1 \nFoundation 16K 1 \nKernel Alloc Once 32K 1 \nMALLOC 16.8M 10 \nMALLOC guard page 3760K 4 \nSTACK GUARD 64K 4 \nStack 2640K 4 \n__AUTH 3975K 362 \n__AUTH_CONST 60.1M 643 \n__CTF 824 1 \n__DATA 28.6M 604 \n__DATA_CONST 24.9M 650 \n__DATA_DIRTY 4800K 581 \n__FONT_DATA 2352 1 \n__INFO_FILTER 8 1 \n__LINKEDIT 188.3M 7 \n__OBJC_RO 84.3M 1 \n__OBJC_RW 3177K 1 \n__TEXT 839.6M 666 \n__TPRO_CONST 128K 2 \nmapped file 32.7M 3 \npage table in kernel 369K 1 \nshared memory 80K 4 \n=========== ======= ======= \nTOTAL 1.3G 3558 \n", "legacyInfo" : { "threadTriggered" : { "queue" : "com.apple.main-thread" } }, "logWritingSignature" : "96bc482de9d7d2e828b9b488a2feab6193d3c188", "bug_type" : "309", "roots_installed" : 0, "trmStatus" : 1, "trialInfo" : { "rollouts" : [ ], "experiments" : [

I started the notarization process for my electron app (just a browser window loading a URL) yesterday (26/03/2025) at around 05:23 GMT. I noticed in a couple of posts here in the forum that it may sometimes take a day to notarize the first app submitted by a team, but it has been over 30 hours now. Here's the log from xcrun notarytool history. createdDate: 2025-03-26T05:23:11.102Z id: ddcb3fca-4667-4acb-8fd1-3298a7c244cc name: xolock-browser.zip status: In Progress Do help me out here, I have zero idea why this is taking so long. Thanks in advance!

I have recently enrolled in the Apple Developer to get my app notarized, and submitted an Archive for notarization, but it is taking forever. It has almost been a whole day, but the status is still in progress, whereas I have seen other developers say that the same takes 10-15 mins to an hour for them. Am I doing anything wrong? Please guide me through this.

Hello, I'm currently developing an iOS app that uses SensorKit. Everything works fine in development and testing — the app correctly requests and receives SensorKit permissions on test devices. In my App ID configuration, the SensorKit Reader Access entitlement (com.apple.developer.sensorkit.reader.allow) is included and visible in Xcode under the project’s entitlements list. However, when I try to archive and distribute the app, I get the following errors in Xcode: Provisioning profile failed qualification Profile doesn't support SensorKit Reader Access. Provisioning profile failed qualification Profile doesn't include the com.apple.developer.sensorkit.reader.allow entitlement. Even though my provisioning profile includes this entitlement, Xcode still refuses to distribute the app. Here’s what I’ve confirmed so far: The provisioning profile lists com.apple.developer.sensorkit.reader.allow in its entitlements. SensorKit works perfectly in debug and development builds. The issue only occurs when attempting to distribute (Archive → Distribute App). Could this be because my account has only development entitlement for SensorKit and not the distribution entitlement? If so, how can I verify or request the proper distribution entitlement for SensorKit Reader Access? Thank you for any guidance or confirmation from Apple regarding this entitlement behavior.

I'm developing an app that receives push notifications, and writes the contents of the push notification to a shared location between the main app and a Notifications Message Extension, through App Groups. This all seems to work on my phone, with developer mode turned on, but when I archive my app as an Enterprise IPA and distribute it, the users can install the app on their phones and they receive the push notifications, but it doesn't appear that the message extension is running as my app displays the content of the shared data in the App Groups on the main screen and nothing is showing. I have tried on 3 phones, and it only works on the phone with developer mode turned on. I can't tell at this point whether it's because of a signing issue, or build phase order issue, or something else?

I will post my app xyz.app uses XY swift package this swift package is a wrapper for XYSDK.xcframework XYSDK.xcframework written in c++ and app running on arm64 macos and iphones succesfully. I got this error when i want to distribute it. Currently i sign .framework for ios with Apple Distribution Certificate and same certificate for macos framework there is no other signing step for swift package or xcframework other than that when i want to archive it validates succesfully. Exporting step shows that app has signed, has provisining profile. but .framework is only signed has no provisioning profile. Also one point i see: i have one target named xyz and its Frameworks, Lİbraries and Embedded Context has only XY package but Embed part has no option like embed and sign etc. Blank. I need more info about what am i doing wrong in which step ? I am stuck and can not move any further like weeks Error Detail: Invalid Signature. The binary with bundle identifier XYSDK at path “xyz.app/Frameworks/XYSDK.framework” contains an invalid signature. Make sure you have signed your application with a distribution certificate, not an ad hoc certificate or a development certificate. Verify that the code signing settings in Xcode are correct at the target level (which override any values at the project level). Additionally, make sure the bundle you are uploading was built using a Release target in Xcode, not a Simulator target. If you are certain your code signing settings are correct, choose “Clean All” in Xcode, delete the “build” directory in the Finder, and rebuild your release target. For more information, please consult https://developer.apple.com/support/code-signing. (90035)

I'm submitting my first macOS app (a native SwiftUI menu bar app, signed with Developer ID Application certificate, Hardened Runtime enabled) for notarization using xcrun notarytool submit with keychain profile authentication. All 9 of my submissions have been stuck at "In Progress" for up to 16 hours. None have transitioned to "Accepted" or "Invalid." Logs are unavailable for all of them (notarytool log returns "Submission log is not yet available"). Environment macOS: 26.2 (25C56) Xcode: 26.1.1 (17B100) notarytool: 1.1.0 (39) App: Native SwiftUI, universal binary (x86_64 + arm64), ~2.2 MB DMG Bundle ID: com.gro.ask Team ID: 4KT56S2BX6 What I've verified Code signing is valid: $ codesign --verify --deep --strict GroAsk.app passes with no errors $ codesign -dvvv GroAsk.app Authority=Developer ID Application: Jack Wu (4KT56S2BX6) Authority=Developer ID Certification Authority Authority=Apple Root CA CodeDirectory flags=0x10000(runtime) # Hardened Runtime enabled Runtime Version=26.1.0 Format=app bundle with Mach-O universal (x86_64 arm64) Entitlements are minimal: com.apple.security.app-sandbox com.apple.security.network.client Uploads succeed — each submission receives a valid submission ID and the file uploads to Apple's servers without error. Submission history Created (UTC): 04:40 ID: eeb12389-... File: GroAsk-1.6.0.dmg Status: Invalid (Hardened Runtime missing — since fixed) ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 04:42 ID: 6e537a32-... File: GroAsk-1.6.0.dmg Status: In Progress (16+ hrs) ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 07:52 ID: 5ee41736-... File: GroAsk-1.6.0.dmg Status: In Progress ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 08:19 ID: f5c6b9a5-... File: GroAsk-1.6.0.dmg Status: In Progress ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 08:27 ID: 0f1c8333-... File: GroAsk-1.6.0.dmg Status: In Progress ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 08:29 ID: 77fd9cd4-... File: GroAsk-1.6.0.dmg Status: In Progress ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 08:51 ID: db9da93e-... File: GroAsk-1.6.1.dmg Status: In Progress ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 09:05 ID: 3c43c09f-... File: GroAsk.zip Status: In Progress ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 12:01 ID: b2267a74-... File: GroAsk-1.6.3.dmg Status: In Progress ──────────────────────────────────────── Created (UTC): 12:15 ID: ae41e45c-... File: GroAsk.zip Status: In Progress The very first submission (eeb12389) came back as Invalid within minutes because Hardened Runtime wasn't enabled on the binary. I fixed the build configuration and confirmed flags=0x10000(runtime) is present on all subsequent builds. However, every submission after that fix has been stuck at "In Progress" with no state transition. What I've tried Submitting both .dmg and .zip formats — same result Verified notarytool log — returns "Submission log is not yet available" for all stuck submissions Apple Developer System Status page shows the Notary Service as "Available" I've also emailed Apple Developer Support but have not received a response yet Questions Is this the expected behavior for a first-time notarization account? I've seen other threads mentioning that new accounts may be held for "in-depth analysis," but 16+ hours with zero feedback seems excessive. 2. Is there any manual configuration Apple needs to do on their end to unblock my team for notarization? 3. Should I stop submitting and wait, or is there something else I can try? Any guidance from DTS would be greatly appreciated. This is blocking the release of my app.

Hi, I was sent here by Apple developer account, it seems here is the only option for me, so your help is very much appreciated! Basically we are building a chromium based browser on iOS, we applied the "com.apple.developer.web-browser" entitlement, and it shows up in our identifier, profile etc. The app is signed with the new entitlement and published to the app store. However it is not listed as an option for default browser, doesn't matter which device I tried. I did verified that the Info.plist contains http/https urlschemes as required. In fact a few of us checked all available documents multiple times and still couldn't see why.

App Notarization got stuck, showing In-Progress from last 24 hrs. This is really frustrating. Can anyone plz update on this?

Hi there, I am trying to build the Apple SimpleAudioDriver example but fail with codesign and/or provisioning. I would be ok for now with the local option, but XCode 16.4 doesn't show the option "build to run locally" (SIP is disabled). When using "Automatically manage signing" it ends in a "Please file a bug report". I found that having two different development teams tripped it up, so I deleted all certificates and keys and made sure to be only signed into one account in Xcode. Can anyone give advice? Thanks a ton! Here is the URL to the sample: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/coreaudio/building-an-audio-server-plug-in-and-driver-extension macOS: 15.6.1 XCode: 16.4 Hardware: MacBook Pro M2 Max SIP: disabled