Overview

I have a VoIP app, now try to implement the new method which support the "PKVoIPPushMetadata" in iOS 26.4. Code as below: /// iOS 26.4+ (SDK with `PKVoIPPushMetadata`): prefer this path for VoIP per Apple; completion is `@Sendable` on supported SDKs. @available(iOS 26.4, *) func pushRegistry(_ registry: PKPushRegistry, didReceiveIncomingVoIPPushWith payload: PKPushPayload, metadata: PKVoIPPushMetadata, withCompletionHandler completion: @escaping @Sendable () -> Void) { print("willtest: didReceiveIncomingVoIPPushWith: metadata=\(metadata)") handleVoIPPush(payload: payload, metadataMustReport: metadata.mustReport, completion: completion) } func pushRegistry(_ registry: PKPushRegistry, didReceiveIncomingPushWith payload: PKPushPayload, for type: PKPushType, completion: @escaping () -> Void) { print("willtest: didReceiveIncomingPushWith: PKPushType=\(type)") handleVoIPPush(payload: payload, metadataMustReport: nil, completion: completion) } But the voip push only goes to the old method on my iOS26.4 device(iPhone17). And it will go to the new method after I delete the old method. So how can I use this method in my app? I must support iOS16+ versions.

Hello everyone, My app (ID: 6756186616) was submitted on Mar 15, 2026, and has been stuck in "Waiting for Review" status for over 17 days. I contacted Developer Support (case #20000111565861) and received confirmation that it's proceeding normally, but no update since. On average, Apple reviews 90 percent of apps within 24 hours. However, there might be cases that need more review time, but mine exceeds two week. Any recent experiences with long queues? Thanks!

[Submitted as FB22200608] With Increase Contrast turned on, the selected row highlight in a List behaves inconsistently between light and dark appearance on iPad. In light appearance the blue selection highlight correctly becomes darker, but in dark appearance it becomes lighter instead. The text contrast ratio drops from about 3:1 to about 1.5:1, well below accessibility guidelines. This reproduces both in the simulator and on a physical device. The sample uses a standard SwiftUI List inside NavigationSplitView with built-in selection styling. No custom colors or styling are applied. REPRO STEPS Create a new Multiplatform project. Replace ContentView with code below. Build and run on iPad. Select an item in the list. Turn on Dark appearance (Cmd-Shift-A in Simulator). Turn on Increase Contrast (Cmd-Control-Shift-A in Simulator). Observe the selected row highlight. ACTUAL In light appearance, the blue selection highlight becomes darker when Increase Contrast is on, improving contrast as expected. In dark appearance, the blue selection highlight becomes lighter when Increase Contrast is on, reducing contrast between the selection background and the white text. EXPECTED Increase Contrast should consistently increase contrast. In dark appearance, the selection highlight should become darker—or otherwise increase contrast with the foreground text—not lighter. SAMPLE CODE struct ContentView: View { @State private var selection: String? var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { Text("Sidebar") } content: { List(selection: $selection) { Text("Item One") .tag("One") Text("Item Two") .tag("Two") } } detail: { if let selection { Text(selection) } else { Text("Select an item") } } } } SCREEN RECORDING CONTACTS The Contacts app behaves correctly. When Increase Contrast is turned on, the selection blue becomes darker, improving contrast. PASSWORDS The Passwords app, however, exhibits the issue. With Increase Contrast turned on, the selection blue becomes lighter instead of darker, reducing contrast.

Has anyone seen Managed Background Assets get stuck before any download progress is reported on iPadOS 26.3 / TestFlight? We are using Apple-hosted managed asset packs for a large on-demand model download. The app can resolve the asset pack metadata: we can show the asset pack’s download size in the UI, so AssetPackManager.assetPack(withID:) appears to work. But when we call ensureLocalAvailability(of:), the UI stays at 0% indefinitely. We also do not receive any useful terminal state from statusUpdates(forAssetPackWithID:): no .began, .downloading, .failed, or .finished. The app remains responsive. The issue also appears persistent on the affected device/account. Reinstalling the app does not help, reinstalling TestFlight does not help, logging out and back in does not help, and restarting the device does not help. After each attempt, the app can still resolve the asset pack metadata/download size, but the actual download remains stuck before any progress or failure status is delivered. The suspicious part of the device log is that the managed helper starts normally, fetches/installs the manifest from TestFlight, but repeatedly fails to create its helper directory inside the app container: OurApp Initializing the asset-pack manager… OurApp Creating a proxy object for the helper service… OurApp activating connection ... name=com.apple.backgroundassets.managed.helper.service kernel Sandbox: no system container path found for ID "com.apple.backgroundassets.managed.helper.service" Managed Background Assets Helper Service Starting the Managed Background Assets Helper Service… Managed Background Assets Helper Service Configuring the directory suffix… Managed Background Assets Helper Service The directory suffix was successfully configured. Managed Background Assets Helper Service The extension token "<...>" was consumed. kernel Sandbox: Managed Background Assets Helper(...) deny(1) file-write-create /private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/.../tmp/com.apple.backgroundassets.managed.helper.service Managed Background Assets Helper Service mkdir: path=/private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/.../tmp/com.apple.backgroundassets.managed.helper.service/ mode= -rwx------: [1: Operation not permitted] After that, manifest fetching still seems to work: OurApp The asset-pack manager has been initialized. OurApp The system download-manager delegate has been assigned to the download manager. OurApp The app was installed for internal beta testing; checking for updates automatically… OurApp Refreshing the manifest… Managed Background Assets Helper Service The app with the bundle ID "..." is configured to use Apple hosting. Managed Background Assets Helper Service Asking the TestFlight extension via the App Store Daemon for the URL request... Managed Background Assets Helper Service Fetching the download manifest ... from TestFlight… Managed Background Assets Helper Service Installing a manifest at ".../Library/Application Support/.../Manifest.json"... But during/after manifest install, the same mkdir failure appears again: Managed Background Assets Helper Service Installing a manifest at ".../Manifest.json"... Managed Background Assets Helper Service mkdir: path=/private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/.../tmp/com.apple.backgroundassets.managed.helper.service/ mode= -rwx------: [1: Operation not permitted] kernel duplicate reports for Sandbox: Managed Background Assets Helper(...) deny(1) file-write-create /private/var/mobile/Containers/Data/Application/.../tmp/com.apple.backgroundassets.managed.helper.service So the behavior seems to be: TestFlight/internal beta install Apple-hosted managed asset pack Manifest fetch succeeds Asset pack metadata resolves, including download size Actual local availability request never starts reporting progress No visible Background Assets failure reaches the app Logs show repeated sandbox file-write-create denial for the Managed Background Assets Helper trying to create /tmp/com.apple.backgroundassets.managed.helper.service inside the app container Reinstalling the app/TestFlight, logging out and back in, and restarting the device do not clear the stuck state On devices with 26.4, the issue doesn’t seem to exist Has anyone else seen this on iOS/iPadOS/macOS versions before 26.4? Is this a known issue in the Managed Background Assets helper/runtime? I noticed 26.4 added more local status APIs for asset packs, so I’m wondering whether this area changed in 26.4. Any hints on whether the sandbox denial is expected/noisy, or whether it could explain ensureLocalAvailability(of:) never progressing, would be appreciated.

Hey We have noticed a change in the retry behavior of Apple Server Notifications webhooks V2 starting around March 12–13, 2026. Previously, when our webhook endpoint returned an HTTP 400 response, Apple would retry the notification delivery multiple times according to the documented retry policy. However, beginning around March 12–13, it appears that Apple no longer retries the webhook when a 400 response is returned. The notification is sent only once and no further retry attempts are made. From our understanding of the documentation, retries should occur when delivery fails, and historically we observed retries even for some 4xx responses. We would like to confirm: Has Apple recently changed the retry behavior for Server Notifications? Are HTTP 4xx responses (specifically 400) now considered terminal failures that will not trigger retries? Is this change intentional or related to a rollout in the webhook delivery system? We have called the "Notification History" endpoint for some users who purchased a sub and we are only getting one attempt with the following data in it: { attemptDate: 1773469202552, (2026-03-14T06:20:02.552Z) sendAttemptResult: 'UNSUCCESSFUL_HTTP_RESPONSE_CODE', } This was 2 days ago, based on the docs, the user should have a few attempts at least. This behavior change affects systems that rely on retries to handle temporary validation issues or transient failures. Thanks!

I’m looking for some advice regarding the usage of temporary exception entitlements in Mac App Store apps. Specifically the Apple Event Temporary Exception to communicate with other third party applications (not first-party macOS system apps): The Best Practices for Submitting Scriptable and AppleScript Apps to the Mac App Store section is a bit vague (how to 'request' a temporary entitlement?) and I couldn't find it mentioned in the Review Guidelines. Before designing, implementing and testing functionality based on the Apple Event Temporary Exception I’d like to know if these entitlements would: A. Always be rejected on the Mac App Store B. Only accepted in highly specific use cases C. Accepted if there is a clear use case and sufficient argumentation For this particular use case I’d like to send Apple Events to Adobe Illustrator and QuarkXPress. The application helps the user with some design tasks in their documents. The app requests the currently open documents and accesses document content to process used design elements. This is optional functionality that the user must explicitly enable in the app. I’m aware that the com.apple.security.scripting-targets entitlement is preferred. (Side question: are these always allowed or can they also be rejected for third party app scripting?) However, many third party applications don’t offer any scripting access groups in their definition, including Adobe Illustrator and QuarkXPress in this case. So before spending a lot of time implementing this feature I’d like to have some indication whether it is unlikely that sending Apple Events to third party apps will be allowed on the Mac App Store. Thanks for any insights!

Hi, A few of my apps will be able to sync with iCloud. So I do realize that we're not allowed to mention any Apple-related names in our app descriptions. Looking for ideas on how to state that the app works with iCloud without saying "iCloud." Thanks, Dan Uff

I recently noticed a UX inconsistency while using the battery charge limit feature on my MacBook with a MagSafe charger. With the optimized charging feature, users can set a custom maximum charging limit (for example, 95%) to improve battery health. However, the MagSafe LED indicator continues to show the charging state (amber) even after the device reaches this user-defined limit. Previously, the LED would turn green when charging reached 100%, clearly indicating a “fully charged” state. But now, when charging stops at a user-defined limit, there is no clear visual feedback that charging has effectively completed based on the user’s preference. This creates confusion, as the LED suggests that charging is still ongoing even though the system has stopped charging at the configured limit. A possible approach to improve this could be to treat the user-defined limit as an effective “fully charged” state during charging. For example: if is_charging: if battery_percentage < user_defined_limit: LED = AMBER else: LED = GREEN This would align the physical LED indicator with the system’s charging behavior and improve clarity for users without requiring hardware changes. Has anyone else observed this behavior, or is there any existing workaround?

Hello, I have an app that is using iOS 26 Network Framework APIs. It is using QUIC, TLS 1.3 and Bonjour. For TLS I am using a PKCS#12 identity. All works well and as expected if the devices (iPhone with no cellular, iPhone with cellular, and iPad no cellular) are all on the same wifi network. If I turn off my router (ie no more wifi network) and leave on the wifi toggle on the iOS devices - only the non cellular iPhone and iPad are able to discovery and connect to each other. My iPhone with cellular is not able to. By sharing my logs with Cursor AI it was determined that the connection between the two problematic peers (iPad with no cellular and iPhone with cellular) never even makes it to the TLS step because I never see the logs where I print out the certs I compare. I tried doing "builder.requiredInterfaceType(.wifi)" but doing that blocked the two non cellular devices from working. I also tried "builder.prohibitedInterfaceTypes([.cellular])" but that also did not work. Is AWDL on it's way out? Should I focus my energy on Wi-Fi Aware? Regards, Captadoh

I have a app that has both mobile and watch versions. Recently some testers report that the watch app could not be launched if the put the app in the background and then resume. And if they kill the app and try to launch again, there is no any response when tapping the app icon. I managed to export some system logs by installing a sysdiagnose profile, and this info looks suspicious

Our app PrepAiro: Crack UPSC IAS 2026 (Account: 6741750813) has been caught in a rejection/resubmission loop since April 12, now over 10 days. Timeline: April 12: First rejection received Cycles 1–6: Each rejection addressed per reviewer feedback, resubmitted promptly April 18: Status moved to "Waiting for Review" , no movement since We submitted an expedited review request through Apple Support due to the urgency. This release contains critical bug fixes actively impacting users, but there has been no response or update. We understand review timelines can vary, but 6 full cycles over 10 days with no resolution, and a 6-day stall after the last submission, is unusual. Each resubmission addressed the specific feedback provided, yet the cycle continues. Has anyone experienced similar extended holds recently? And is there any additional channel or escalation path beyond the expedited review request to get clarity on what's causing this? Any guidance from Apple or fellow developers would be appreciated.

Platform: macOS 26.3.1, M5 Pro MacBook Pro Framework: CoreWLAN Affected applications: NetViews, Air Tool 2, and our own tooling — appears to be specific to the new Wi-Fi 7 hardware Hardware Card Type: chip id: 0x11 api 1.2 firmware [Rev 72.11.260 N1B1 devFused=0] phy [17.1.17.0], core80211 [324.10.260 N1_silicon_b] Firmware: Jan 27 2026 21:18:32 version XBS_BUILD_TAG GIT_DESCRIBE FWID chip id: 0x11 api 1.2 firmware [Rev 72.11.260 N1B1 devFused=0] phy [17.1.17.0], core80211 [324.10.260 N1_silicon_b] Driver: IO80211_driverkit-1540.16 "IO80211_driverkit-1540.16" Jan 27 2026 Background Both issues described below were working correctly on macOS 26 with previous-generation hardware. The regression is specific to the Wi-Fi 7 card shipping in the M5 Pro MacBook Pro. This is not an OS regression — it is a hardware/driver/firmware compatibility issue with the new card under macOS 26. Issue 1: disassociate() + tcpdump/Wireshark -I no longer enters monitor mode Previously, the standard approach of calling disassociate() and then launching tcpdump -i en0 -I or Wireshark -i en0 -I -k would successfully put the interface into monitor mode. On the M5 Pro Wi-Fi 7 card, this no longer works. The capture tool launches but the interface either stays in station mode or enters mode 0 - where there is no connection, but still not able to be a monitor radio. This is the primary regression affecting third-party wireless tools. Issue 2: setWLANChannel reports success but the radio only retunes once As a workaround for Issue 1, we use the built-in Wireless Diagnostics → Sniffer tool to establish monitor mode (which works fairly reliably on this hardware). Once the interface is in monitor mode via that path, we attempt to change the channel using setWLANChannel: let iface = CWWiFiClient.shared().interface(withName: "en0")! let target = iface.supportedWLANChannels()! .first { $0.channelNumber == 6 && $0.channelWidth == .width20MHz }! try iface.setWLANChannel(target) The first call succeeds (eg: channel 48 -> 6) the radio actually tunes to the requested channel and Wireshark captures frames there. Any subsequent call (eg: channel 48 -> 6 -> 1) shows the same apparent success - no error thrown, wlanChannel() updates to reflect the new channel - but the radio does not retune. Wireshark continues capturing on the first changed channel. We have tested with disassociate() and interface power cycling between attempts — neither resets the ability to retune the radio. What we have ruled out Timing: delays between calls make no difference Competing processes holding the interface wlanChannel() returning a stale cache value — it updates correctly, but diverges from actual hardware state after the first channel change Key data point: Wireless Diagnostics Sniffer works The built-in Wireless Diagnostics → Sniffer tool successfully puts the interface into monitor mode on this hardware. This confirms the card and driver are capable - the issue is that the capability is no longer reachable via CoreWLAN or via tcpdump/Wireshark's -I flag. Wireless Diagnostics Sniffer does not support live channel changes, so it cannot serve as a full workaround. The questions Is there a supported path for third-party apps to enter monitor mode on the new Wi-Fi 7 hardware on macOS 26? What is the correct mechanism for changing channels while in monitor mode - is setWLANChannel expected to retune the radio on subsequent calls, or is there a different API intended for this? The fact that Wireless Diagnostics accomplishes both (albeit, not live) confirms the hardware and driver are fully capable - we are looking for the sanctioned equivalent for third-party tools.

Hello, I'm posting again because my situation has not improved despite previous outreach. My app (ID: 6756186616, iOS 1.3.0) was submitted on March 15, 2026 — over 6 weeks ago. After about 4 weeks in "Waiting for Review," it moved to "In Review" on April 14, 2026. It has now been stuck in "In Review" for two full weeks with no further updates. I opened a Developer Support case (#20000111565861) earlier in the process and was told my submission was being investigated, but I have not received any follow-up communication since. Given Apple's stated review timelines, a 6+ week review with two weeks of silence during the active In Review phase is a serious blocker for an independent developer. I would really appreciate: Any clarity on whether something specific in my submission is causing this delay Whether there is an escalation path beyond Developer Support Whether anyone else has experienced similar timelines recently and how they were resolved Thank you for your time.

I enrolled in the Apple Developer Program on April 13, 2026 (Order Number: W214****). Payment was completed and the invoice was issued, but my account has not been activated yet. It has now been 4 days. I have not received any activation email, nor any request for identity verification or additional information. Could anyone help? I am waiting to publish my app and this delay is blocking my progress.

Hello, my Apple Developer Program enrollment has been pending for 5 days - I am not able to reach support cause the don't answer phone. I have completed all steps and payment - have my invoice. . Could you help somehow?

Hi there, I’m curious to understand how the system determines which language to use for an app. The system is currently set to en-IN (English - India). My app supports the following languages: en (the default development language) en-GB (United Kingdom) en-IE (Ireland) en-US (United States) When I run the app, the Bundle.main.preferredLanguages returns [„en-GB“, „en“], which causes the app to be set to en-GB. However, when the app doesn’t support the preferred system language, I would expect it to default to the en language. Surprisingly, this is not the case. This behavior is precisely described in Technical Note TN2418. Unfortunately, there’s no explanation provided. Is this behavior related to the CLDR Linguistic Distance? I also attempted to replace the default development language en with en-001 (English - world), but it had no effect.

I was selected as one of the winners for the recent Swift Student Challenge, and I was wondering if we will get more information regarding the delivery of the AirPods Max 2 and the certificate? Were these already delivered? I haven't received any email about this, so I wanted to ask here.

Excited for AlarmKit! I have found two concerns that I cannot find answers for though. The volume of my alarms seems to be very quite relative to the full volume capability of the device. For example, if I turn the volume all the way up and play the audio file, the sound is very loud. However then, if I set the alarm using alarm kit with the same audio, the track played during the alerting phase is not that loud. I am afraid that it will not be loud enough in real life. Will there be future support to set the volume level of the alarm to maximum settings? When I press the volume buttons (with the app open) during an active alarm, the audio stops, but the alarm manager does not clear these events. The alarm manager does clear the alarm event if the alarm is stopped through a live activity.

There are multiple iOS simulator runtimes located at /System/Library/AssetsV2/com_apple_MobileAsset_iOSSimulatorRuntime which I don't need. I tried the following approaches to delete them but not working. Xcode > Settings > Components > Delete (It can delete some but not all of them) xcrun simctl runtime list (It doesn't show the old runtimes) sudo rm (Operation not permitted) sudo rm -rf cc1f035290d244fca4f74d9d243fcd02d2876c27.asset Password: rm: cc1f035290d244fca4f74d9d243fcd02d2876c27.asset/AssetData/096-69246-684.dmg: Operation not permitted rm: cc1f035290d244fca4f74d9d243fcd02d2876c27.asset/AssetData: Operation not permitted rm: cc1f035290d244fca4f74d9d243fcd02d2876c27.asset/Info.plist: Operation not permitted rm: cc1f035290d244fca4f74d9d243fcd02d2876c27.asset/version.plist: Operation not permitted rm: cc1f035290d244fca4f74d9d243fcd02d2876c27.asset: Operation not permitted I have two questions: Why "xcrun simctl runtime list" is unable to list some old runtimes? How to delete them?

I’m trying to use MTL4FXTemporalDenoisedScaler, and I’m seeing a crash during initialization even with a very simple sample app. I created a minimal sample here: https://github.com/tatsuya-ogawa/MetalFXInitExample The exception is: NSException: "-[AGXG16XFamilyHeap baseObject]: unrecognized selector sent to instance ..." What I found is: • This works: descriptor.makeTemporalDenoisedScaler(device: device) • This crashes: descriptor.makeTemporalDenoisedScaler(device: device, compiler: metal4Compiler) So the issue seems to happen only with the Metal4FX version. For testing, I’m using an iPhone 15 Pro. According to the Metal Feature Set Tables, MetalFX denoised upscaling should be supported on Apple9 and later, so I believe the device itself should meet the requirements. Reference: https://developer.apple.com/metal/Metal-Feature-Set-Tables.pdf Has anyone seen this before, or knows what might be causing it? I’d appreciate any advice. Thanks.